[{"_1":2,"_98":-5,"_99":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,74,86],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":44,"_46":47,"_48":49,"_50":51,"_52":53,"_54":55,"_56":57,"_58":59,"_60":61,"_62":63,"_64":65,"_66":67,"_68":69,"_70":67,"_71":72,"_73":72},"mediaId",6604278,"mediaKeyId","2993112-26ec096be51c5ecb8e5efb60df829567","parentId",2993112,"title","Development Review Committee records no substantive comments; forwards two site plans to department heads","audioSeconds",0,"startMs",1931000,"endMs","viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2993112-26ec096be51c5ecb8e5efb60df829567&start=1931&end=1931","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2993112-26ec096be51c5ecb8e5efb60df829567/thumbnail_1931000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6604278/Nassau-County/Florida/Development-Review-Committee-records-no-substantive-comments-forwards-two-site-plans-to-department-heads","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6604278-d856bf4202aba52391aaec6117a13ab8/orig.mp4?Expires=1773709712&Signature=ffSLChODM0Ut9GhUSWE01jLfLIsAan5Gj391kfqR0xW4PfvohRwkckEqI-m23R7hP0ciP5xmk-z92svywpjfSP6dmU68mjEfJWVX6amDS8hGgZ9XVRW2xj8PQYtsn5iRaan~MgluzxSOzJtkOnMPkxXaug4v-E53d-qYLqHsiSmRCkDWsxBy0MHIR0l3rIVHy2cNbN64vdu9E0NV3Si3PQqNTKxgO7vMRRvpWV82DDMdTOtEksuxvj6p0nH8Q918bLj19xDAcQv6-zvqc6~XbyoHE2MTOwE4rjZ0JgyGsoqYAbGEcDgIQ7CsoFU7jDzRt8vLDGdQlXHBM1Nq1uh8Vw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Nassau County","date","2025-04-15T08:58:00Z","article","During the April 15 Nassau County Development Review Committee meeting, staff indicated there were no substantive comments on two items on the committee’s approvals agenda and the items were advanced to department heads for final approval consideration.

For PBSP SP25‑006 (Highway 17 Storage Facility), Constance Lake (Building Department), Stephanie Kaiser (Planning), Kayla Pierce (Development Services), the Health Department and Fire Department each said they had no further comments on the package. For SEP SP24‑049 (Wildlife CVS), the same set of departments reported no further comments.

The meeting record shows these items moved through the committee’s approvals segment without substantive technical comments; the committee’s role is advisory and department heads provide final approvals. The committee concluded the meeting after recording the lack of comments on both items.

No formal roll‑call vote, motion text, mover/second or vote tally was recorded in the transcript; staff remarks indicate the items had no outstanding technical comments at the DRC level and were forwarded to department heads per the committee’s advisory process.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Nassau County - Development Review Committee - Apr 15, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","At the April 15 meeting the committee recorded no further technical comments on PBSP SP25‑006 (Highway 17 Storage Facility) and SEP SP24‑049 (Wildlife CVS) and the items were advanced to department heads for final review.","taxTitle","Nassau County, Florida","taxId",72832,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":75,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":76,"_41":77,"_43":78,"_45":79,"_46":80,"_48":81,"_50":82,"_52":83,"_54":55,"_56":57,"_58":84,"_60":61,"_62":63,"_64":85,"_66":67,"_68":69,"_70":67,"_71":72,"_73":72},6604282,"Developers told to address buffers, utilities and fire access for proposed 10,640‑square‑foot retail on narrow lot",1184,786000,1970000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2993112-26ec096be51c5ecb8e5efb60df829567&start=786&end=1970","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2993112-26ec096be51c5ecb8e5efb60df829567/thumbnail_786000.jpg","/articles/6604282/Nassau-County/Florida/Developers-told-to-address-buffers-utilities-and-fire-access-for-proposed-10640squarefoot-retail-on-narrow-lot","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6604282-f9ab3b4665b24f39b303a6b332fc5ac6/orig.mp4?Expires=1773709712&Signature=jvu8I0Jp0zskpRihSF~SBqLbuOBVg4gFnJWBWpK2BK6tbevHs5fbphwvJ5hckeA2bfeuLZPdfm-4CvXzZ-tSgEOUIPO3zhiqKjb2dFtxN2-L7rkuxLsbAUYftAgeAFYa9pEMKMZMrXYSQsGBZsDBRyo6bVDWDyBctPb-tkB2xKTttxpo1NxS2AakdNRRgGQ8ac0jBW3~IvS0~BBxs1nba1wjQnOF~14~QOIXp82MveBmewfJurolUdEDpp9t-sy4lGLsx4UpV~8qj552BxBjCa1XErV~20uv14sTEQjbtCqCvokPS4IwRxQubTuIY7JWfrjKZ3nVatdeN~vBgaPqkg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","At the April 15 Nassau County Development Review Committee meeting, Holly Irish of Concept Companies presented a preliminary plan for a 10,640‑square‑foot single‑tenant retail store on a long, narrow parcel. Staff walked the applicant through zoning, buffering, utilities and fire‑safety considerations the applicant must address at formal plan submittal.

“Good morning. Holly Irish with Concept Companies. … Our project is a proposed we're at the very preliminary stages of, about 10,640 square foot commercial retail store,” Holly Irish said when introducing the project.

Stephanie Kaiser, Planning, said the site is zoned Commercial General (CG) and “will be subject to the development standards in Article 16” and to the comp plan’s maximum intensity standards. Kaiser told the applicant a high‑density landscape buffer will be required along the parcel’s east side because residential uses lie adjacent to that boundary, and perimeter and mechanical/dumpster screening requirements will apply under the cited code sections (table 37‑6 and section 37‑05(d)).

Development Services staff reiterated county expectations on driveways, sidewalks and stormwater. Kayla Hurst (Development Services) told the applicant a 6‑foot sidewalk would normally be required on the property frontage and an internal sidewalk connection must be provided. The county also requires paved parking and vehicle use areas and stormwater design sized for the 100‑year storm and supported by geotechnical studies and formal stormwater maintenance plans.

Health and utility constraints were a central part of the discussion. The applicant said JEA water is available but distant; staff recorded that the water main is about 5,000 feet from the site and sewer about 2,000 feet from the site based on an availability letter the applicant had obtained. The Health Department asked the applicant to provide a formal water and sewer availability letter for review. “If you decide to go well and septic…we gotta design the well with public use standards,” the Health Department representative said.

Fire staff told the applicant that absence of a nearby public water source could require alternative measures such as storage tanks, dry hydrants or other systems to provide required firefighting water, and reminded the applicant that apparatus access must place a doorway within the required distance for hose deployment. Amanda with Fire said sprinklers may or may not be required depending on hazard classification and building construction; she noted Nassau County’s building threshold that typically triggers sprinkler requirements is around 12,000 square feet, and the proposed 10,640 square feet is below that threshold but water supply for fire operations still must be addressed.

Applicants were also reminded the county’s current two‑step submittal process (preliminary binding site plan and site engineering plan) remains in effect; proposed code revisions that could allow a single‑step SEP process are in draft but must still go through hearings before implementation.

No formal action was taken at the meeting; staff provided written and technical direction for use at formal PBSP and SEP submittal.","Concept Companies presented a preliminary plan for a 10,640‑square‑foot single‑tenant retail building; county staff advised on high‑density buffers adjacent to residences, sidewalk and paving requirements, water/sewer availability and potential fire‑protection workarounds.",{"_33":87,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":88,"_41":89,"_43":90,"_45":91,"_46":92,"_48":93,"_50":94,"_52":95,"_54":55,"_56":57,"_58":96,"_60":61,"_62":63,"_64":97,"_66":67,"_68":69,"_70":67,"_71":72,"_73":72},6604285,"Nassau County staff outline requirements for proposed 20,000‑square‑foot skate rink near State Road 200",642,246000,888000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2993112-26ec096be51c5ecb8e5efb60df829567&start=246&end=888","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2993112-26ec096be51c5ecb8e5efb60df829567/thumbnail_246000.jpg","/articles/6604285/Nassau-County/Florida/Nassau-County-staff-outline-requirements-for-proposed-20000squarefoot-skate-rink-near-State-Road-200","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6604285-2252ca89cc4acda60bf5c96bd56ac043/orig.mp4?Expires=1773709712&Signature=gAJTPOhebwirBWvABLr4beqRhu46JTk15SegP9vlxpWKUX1NbVrarc6krV06PrFamEZtvf~hos722EPLBBrWjG-dUt9TheFxcEYvJcRtGRtLXZgZxCP65aGA1mbafC09zorsGGBR8GuoQTVAAidm7GBQ~JMUhqrxyP5xtrbUM3gRhKWMq6JjK9ZyopKjau23FEreeDJkyxT89UrUsRhxPHA8ndoiuj6Ro3obPfs9ZRqX~ZfSE4eLpYtMnvvCBUaY~Ek2mnR4i1-fV0fNEPbbQkDVQu4EXCjm~pvo7JXm14m0hgZszsQgIUsOgTaUEIgO68t5NNJb8l6G5FS-HAECeQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","At the April 15 Nassau County Development Review Committee meeting, county staff provided preliminary technical comments on a proposed 20,000‑square‑foot competitive skate rink on an approximately 8.5‑acre parcel near the intersection of State Road 200 and Harry Green Road.

The proposal, presented by Ron Flick on behalf of property owner Judith H. Turner, would develop roughly one‑fifth of the parcel in an initial phase because the applicant reports that just under 70% of the site is wetlands. “Proposing to only develop the a small section of the acreage due to wetlands and wetland mitigation that we have to go through for the remaining balance because we have approximately, just under 70% of the land is wet,” Ron Flick said when introducing the project.

The committee’s technical comments focused on multiple requirements the applicant must meet at plan submittal. Stephanie Kaiser, Planning, told the applicant the property lies inside the State Road 200 overlay and “per Section 30 State Road 200, are required to be an additional 25 feet back, but that can be waived, with the DRC, pending a written request.” Kaiser also noted the parcel’s land‑use and zoning implications: the site is assigned a commercial future land use and is subject to development standards in Article 17 and the comp plan’s maximum intensity limits. She told the applicant a perimeter landscape buffer is required along State Road 200 and a high‑density landscape buffer will be required where the site adjoins residential uses.

Caleb Hurst, speaking for roadway and drainage staff, listed transportation and stormwater expectations: a commercial driveway must meet Article 5 standards; frontage work will likely require a 6‑foot sidewalk and connection to internal sidewalks and, where applicable, a 10‑foot multi‑use trail per Section 11.7.1; parking and vehicle use areas must be paved per Section 9.9.0.1; and stormwater design — including pond top‑of‑bank sized for the 100‑year storm and geotechnical and engineering calculations — will be required at site engineering plan submittal. Hurst also said the applicant must submit a stormwater infrastructure maintenance plan per Section 10.6.0.7.0.4 and that traffic review will be initiated under BOCC Resolution 2019‑174.

Constance Lake, Building Department, said she had no additional comments but noted the site appears to be in an X flood hazard zone on FEMA map panel 214GS. Ronnie from the Health Department asked the applicant to provide a letter of availability for water and sewer. Amanda with Fire advised that lack of a nearby water source could require alternate fire protection measures such as tanks or a dry hydrant and said fire apparatus access must place a door within about 50 feet of the building for firefighting operations.

The presentation was handled as a pre‑application review; staff provided technical comments intended for use at the time of preliminary binding site plan and site engineering plan submittal. No formal vote or county approval was taken at the meeting; the committee’s comments were advisory.

The applicant said the ownership information will be corrected before formal submittal and acknowledged staff guidance on buffers, access, utilities and stormwater. The committee recorded the meeting and advised the applicant to include the noted reports and plan elements when formally applying.","At an April 15 Development Review Committee meeting, county staff flagged buffers, stormwater, driveway and flood‑zone requirements for a proposed 20,000‑square‑foot competitive skate rink on an roughly 8.5‑acre parcel near State Road 200 and Harry Green Road.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Development Review Committee records no substantive comments; forwards two site plans to department heads

Developers told to address buffers, utilities and fire access for proposed 10,640‑square‑foot retail on narrow lot

Nassau County staff outline requirements for proposed 20,000‑square‑foot skate rink near State Road 200