[{"_1":2,"_99":-5,"_100":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6274214,"mediaKeyId","2994356-07ee3098f9087c68168229e4c392cdf3","parentId",2994356,"title","Developers present answers on proposed Titus solar project; company offers to cover county legal costs up to $20,000","audioSeconds",172,"startMs",2908000,"endMs",3080000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=2994356-07ee3098f9087c68168229e4c392cdf3&start=2908&end=3080","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2994356-07ee3098f9087c68168229e4c392cdf3/thumbnail_2908000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6274214/Young-County/Texas/Developers-present-answers-on-proposed-Titus-solar-project-company-offers-to-cover-county-legal-costs-up-to-20000","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6274214-ca1483e87582fea0b068d438cf6c941a/orig.mp4?Expires=1771089616&Signature=OhNZoAa5nZ~QAPa0d~ymStRsO85yIwiDJNtilRytDXedZ1em7CovztfJjcBPGFuWAWGyPpUysFB3ZsW498bWpOrX~tfBdt3l7Xpp22KKnBe3kd584fkBIPDSd5eQRQ7B95DZKACenhBe6-f9IdAmUeSc1~hj4vwqA0o2GlHGe7BgGKeE92f9lXRicv7WPH3bvkAebi7C3K8fh5KdvFRTAM5gQohs2Kgl8E-t8nZJrXFJQPRWUHjoNVFhErgLai-hCMuk7jK4eRdt-Dxz92ccJQDOMSbazYZ7DAaNt1McEK0H7jl2S4ZcX0cYiMNM8iLUqq~lVdaRt-hyYC7LAdA-Fw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Young County CA","date","2025-04-15T16:19:54.473Z","article","Representatives for Titus LCV LLC provided written answers and spoke with the Young County Commissioners Court Tuesday about a proposed utility-scale solar farm that would occupy thousands of acres in the county.

Commissioners and several residents raised questions about federal funding, phased development, landowner protections, environmental review and potential impacts on neighboring property values. In written responses read to the court, the company said there is no federal approval or grant funding specifically for development of renewable projects, but that solar projects are eligible for the federal investment tax credit and eligibility is determined on a case-by-case basis.

The company confirmed it currently holds roughly 2,200 acres under lease in the area and said its acreage target for the project ranges from about 2,500 to 4,000 acres depending on transmission provider negotiations. Titus representatives said they intend the project to be developed in a single phase.

On compensation for neighboring property owners, Titus said there are no plans for direct payments for any decline in nearby property values. The company said it invests in buffers and aesthetic measures (distance from property lines, visual screening and landscaping) to reduce impacts, but that property valuation is an objective, case-by-case matter.

During discussion about legal and financial protections, the county’s point person reported that the company initially offered to sponsor up to $10,000 in county legal costs; after follow-up the company increased that offer and “is prepared to sponsor the county’s reasonable legal expenses up to a cap of $20,000,” according to court discussion. Commissioners said they intend to consider retaining outside counsel (the judge mentioned the prospect of retaining advice from Allison Bass of the Lisonbee Bass firm) to evaluate tax abatement and reinvestment-zone agreements and other contract terms; no firm retention decision or vote was recorded at the meeting.

Residents urged more detail on the developer’s experience and track record. One resident said Titus LCV LLC’s Texas registration dates to 2023 and asked whether the company has completed any solar projects; speakers said many solar and wind projects are developed and later sold to investor purchasers, and that some developers operate in packaging/resale models. Commissioners noted they and county staff are reaching out to counterparts in other counties for background checks and practical experience with leases, bonds and road agreements.

Questions also focused on decommissioning protections and bonds. Speakers said typical lease and development agreements include a bond or other financial guarantee to ensure restoration if a project goes south; the court was told that bond language is often written to protect landowners and that county-imposed bonding beyond private landowner contracts is not typical. The court and several residents urged clarity about which roads would be used for construction and whether county road agreements would be required.

Several residents recommended the county consider longer-term planning, including formation of a regional planning body (a “Chapter 391” subregional planning commission) to coordinate other local governments and stakeholders around major development proposals. Commissioners and the judge said they will continue to gather information, consult outside counsel if needed and require the developer to provide additional documentation before any formal county action on tax abatements or reinvestment-zone designations.

No vote was taken during the item; commissioners did record acceptance of the company’s offered cap on sponsorship of legal expenses as a negotiation point and discussed next steps.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Young County Commissioners Court Live","oneSentenceSummary","Representatives for Titus LCV LLC provided written answers and spoke with the Young County Commissioners Court about a proposed solar project that could encompass thousands of acres in Young County.","taxTitle","Young County, Texas","taxId",69637,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6274219,"Young County names county cemetery for William P. Johnson, adopts preservation rules",2265,1498000,3763000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2994356-07ee3098f9087c68168229e4c392cdf3&start=1498&end=3763","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2994356-07ee3098f9087c68168229e4c392cdf3/thumbnail_1498000.jpg","/articles/6274219/Young-County/Texas/Young-County-names-county-cemetery-for-William-P-Johnson-adopts-preservation-rules","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6274219-3e3576eebd4bea360bc3d6ac4a7ee189/orig.mp4?Expires=1771089616&Signature=FxuniBT5HUQe-rHhfydu0~om7rEJyWTUtEwxaBClCAkoRdOsvv1k~NfaYc2xThTkEs57v5zOUrmTGicvacRCNgaqmzA5Eq2635SUwYoZNuea2qeokwwszjRh5Ye-Vv6c4YxisLL0Ow9vQSznB7F9fmbK8mHkGBdFLUpNOSWRh6xNqmXhaQyeInX6vmXFNaPaX0RDMeGSJl9xv63h1YJ77Q--BPGE7bYqv8sTb1HPKbwzwr1-i4gQ6Aoci93autTHQT6VsP0IEySTi07BaFRZhSHX2QRuCMvQ5w9qDomeke6vx2xxkFf35qfcIOB1M5fBl54AAuAL8wxm6d9YqOKKBQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Young County Commissioners Court voted unanimously Tuesday to officially name the county-owned burial ground on the 380 Bypass the William P. Johnson Cemetery and to adopt rules aimed at preserving the site.

The court’s action followed a presentation from the Young County Historical Commission detailing the cemetery’s history and a recommended set of regulations. The court also approved erecting official signage and directed the establishment of a preservation committee to advise the commissioners on maintenance and restoration needs.

The historical commission reported that the land was donated on Dec. 4, 1923, to then-County Judge W.H. Reeves and his successors by Addie M. Grant, and that the deed stipulated the land be used solely as a burial ground “for the local black community.” Commission members said the small cemetery had been maintained for decades by William P. Johnson Jr., who mowed and cared for the grounds without compensation until his death in 1971. The commission recommended the William P. Johnson name as nondiscriminatory and respectful of local usage and history.

“I have never known it as any other thing than William P. Johnson,” said one local speaker during the discussion of the historical record and community usage. The commissioners read the historical commission’s research and then considered a draft resolution formally naming the site. The court approved the resolution by voice vote, recorded as 5–0 in favor.

Alongside the naming, the court reviewed a set of rules drafted by the preservation committee. Among the provisions read into the record: the cemetery is recognized as a historic black cemetery owned and maintained by Young County; the cemetery is closed to new burials; no new markers, headstones, structures, fencing, landscaping or other objects may be added or altered without explicit approval of the commissioners court; and the court will establish a William P. Johnson Cemetery Preservation Committee to advise the commissioners. The rules require removal of deteriorated decorations and ban racist or derogatory language related to the cemetery.

Commissioners and historical commission members stressed the rules are intended to preserve the dignity and historical integrity of the site. The court also approved language that signage reflecting the official designation be installed on site.

The historical commission noted prior community efforts to restore and maintain the cemetery, including work by the Graham Kiwanis Club and local volunteers that cleaned, fenced and repaired markers. Speakers also described past vandalism to a memorial sign and asked the court to address reported damage; the court recorded a separate motion related to the sign and maintenance.

The court’s recorded motions and approvals on the cemetery items were unanimous. Officials said the preservation committee will be appointed by the commissioners court and will have advisory authority only; the county retains final authority over alterations and enforcement.

County officials said the decisions would be entered into the official record and that signage and committee appointments would be the next steps.

Proposed next actions mentioned during the meeting included surveying the site, coordinating with descendants and community stakeholders, and continuing restoration work under the supervision of the preservation committee.","The Young County Commissioners Court officially named a county-owned cemetery on the 380 Bypass the William P. Johnson Cemetery and adopted rules to protect it as a historic site. The court also directed formation of a preservation committee and approved installation of signage; motions passed unanimously.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6274209,"Young County approves $23,673.53 disbursement to cover arena operating deficit",216,2548000,2764000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=2994356-07ee3098f9087c68168229e4c392cdf3&start=2548&end=2764","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/2994356-07ee3098f9087c68168229e4c392cdf3/thumbnail_2548000.jpg","/articles/6274209/Young-County/Texas/Young-County-approves-2367353-disbursement-to-cover-arena-operating-deficit","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6274209-77f63b1fefd7a1b5909920f4aa3fdf0a/orig.mp4?Expires=1771089616&Signature=VJ~9t~kcqU8MHw4U~kopKKLG78kLAF9Qj-iHEgybSqWhIUzimCkCS81e9pDaJi1BdSRgaz5pEu~wKLSABB8uMI~vtUVZtlKgeFWsVKTnHMumw~cYHqYqKbRqmuPQ320R~usiRyHPv~lvG1TekPTX2Y4QPmNm~Ft5vsAJmsoIgPIq6rNYdwta5eMk4Z5DxyaFhSJ18HG30Guvi~ZSTgmrZ6YXa3aZ~jlXE1Kr-6oXFPa~Azqi24O1VoOGthtvxdmgVX02MAMMBxTXN1acxpmXbn81aVyTnLBg006UsNEfL-uGdXO~asnpGGpIPVKWDFvH88t3ZoXM2QdoQCOl~mpZrw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Young County Commissioners Court authorized a quarterly disbursement of $23,673.53 to support the Young County Arena’s operating deficit under the county’s lease agreement with the City of Graham.

Eric Garrett, identified in the meeting as the Grand (City) manager, presented the second-quarter financial report for the arena and asked the county to authorize the indicated disbursement. Garrett said arena self-supported revenue totaled about $239,000 so far in the fiscal year and that weekend bookings are strong; he also forecast additional county requests in future quarters and estimated a possible third-quarter ask of roughly $43,000.

Garrett told the court that capital and maintenance costs—workers’ compensation, janitorial supplies and some electrical and plumbing repairs—have driven expenses above line-item budgets. He said the arena board is evaluating rate adjustments and capital improvements (such as stall mats) intended to increase bookings and reduce the annual subsidy requirement.

Commissioner Wiley moved to authorize the disbursement of $23,673.53 and Commissioner Shook seconded. The motion carried on a recorded voice vote, 5–0.

During the discussion the manager and commissioners noted the arena’s annual shortfall target of $125,000 and said they plan to keep that figure in the FY 2026 budget planning process. Commissioners thanked board volunteers and city staff for increased revenue generation and asked for further financial details in follow-up budget work one-on-one with city staff.

The court’s authorization releases the identified quarter’s funds. Garrett said he will return with rate-change proposals and further budget details during the FY 2026 process.","The commissioners approved a $23,673.53 payment to cover the Young County Arena operating deficit for the current quarter, and heard a quarterly financial update projecting larger requests later in the fiscal year.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Developers present answers on proposed Titus solar project; company offers to cover county legal costs up to $20,000

Young County names county cemetery for William P. Johnson, adopts preservation rules

Young County approves $23,673.53 disbursement to cover arena operating deficit