New Hampshire House Bill 296 allows building on class 6 roads despite local opposition

The New Hampshire Senate Commerce Committee convened on April 15, 2025, to discuss House Bill 296, which proposes to allow property owners to build on land located along private or Class 6 roads. Proponents argue that the bill enhances property rights, while opponents raise concerns about potential financial burdens on municipalities and public safety.

The bill's primary advocate emphasized its simplicity and the empowerment it offers to property owners. However, several local officials and residents voiced strong opposition during the meeting. Dawn Merryman, a selectman from Raymond, highlighted the risks associated with building on Class 6 roads, which are not maintained by municipalities. She warned that such developments could lead to significant infrastructure costs for towns, particularly if roads wash out or require emergency services access.

Merryman urged the committee to allow local boards to maintain control over development decisions, arguing that they are better equipped to assess the unique needs and conditions of their communities. Patricia Bridal, also from Raymond, echoed these concerns, stating that the bill could lead to increased litigation and financial strain on towns. She criticized the rapid pace of legislative changes regarding housing and development, suggesting that the existing data indicates New Hampshire has already met its housing needs.

Bernie Deshaies, representing the New Hampshire Municipal Association, expressed similar reservations. He pointed out that the bill could create confusion regarding building permits and municipal liability, potentially forcing towns to allow construction in unsafe areas. Deshaies emphasized that Class 6 roads were historically not designed for development and that the current law aims to prevent premature and sporadic development.

The committee's discussions highlighted a significant divide between those advocating for property rights and those concerned about the implications for local governance and public safety. As the hearing concluded, the future of House Bill 296 remains uncertain, with further deliberations expected as lawmakers weigh the potential impacts on New Hampshire's communities.