[{"_1":2,"_98":-5,"_99":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,86],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6601218,"mediaKeyId","3005987-bfcb8e2036fea741971fda684244cadb","parentId",3005987,"title","Board passes a slate of ordinances, advances bond and contract approvals; summary of key votes","audioSeconds",10648,"startMs",152000,"endMs",10800000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=3005987-bfcb8e2036fea741971fda684244cadb&start=152&end=10800","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3005987-bfcb8e2036fea741971fda684244cadb/thumbnail_152000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6601218/San-Francisco-County/California/Board-passes-a-slate-of-ordinances-advances-bond-and-contract-approvals-summary-of-key-votes","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6601218-c1446b38efa8f75c92adbc689b0cc41a/orig.mp4?Expires=1771174520&Signature=fUndesqtxE7uaFIPDtB4LfdZSKh-jhzCeWF0y4yHFzpz-nAlME91X4M2eFD-6WSWOlkaPvnBw~zsJ8PQidvBqbGBHmUwPZePwFK~HShEjk8npfrq~t9rwZnPyRoXq8JPrZp5HhwvX675-itVYBbw2fsR9emkWjYCxACcF8MVmZEgQ5fpz7wvEFzryz4w1KzdXI5LlIYZwice4un2fWRvYd0WUU7Hcsj-MZV8HDWxCI56xTIToyh7lLZ~-WxNi2aG1L~S5u9e6L7ERtrKb0ZgeFM22iRAjveeTfgepfHqMmk4D07SNUODcHxE4z61iCoI1dpwkGDJjaplJ~7LRtAq9A__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Sanfrancisco Government tv","date","2025-04-16T03:58:00Z","article","The San Francisco Board of Supervisors took roll-call action on a number of consent and calendar items during its September meeting. Highlights of votes and formal actions recorded on the transcript are summarized below. This is a concise, factual account of recorded outcomes; discussions and speakers on individual items are reported where they involved substantive debate.

Votes at a glance

- Items 1–7 (consent agenda): Approved by unanimous roll call (11 ayes).

- Item 8 — Clean Power SF customer and reserve fund: Ordinance appropriating $19,500,000 of Public Utilities Commission hedge fund balance to support the Clean Power SF community-choice aggregation program. Roll-call result recorded as 8 ayes and 3 noes; the ordinance was finally passed.

- Item 9 — Parking tax simplification: Ordinance amending business and tax regulations, police and planning codes regarding parking tax simplification for residential properties: Passed (11 ayes).

- Item 10 — Mechanical car wash at existing gas/service stations on 19th Avenue: Ordinance amending the Planning Code to permit mechanical car wash at previously permitted gasoline/service stations on Nineteenth Avenue: Passed unanimously on the floor at first reading.

- Item 11 — Park code demonstration/petition restrictions: Ordinance amending the Park Code to repeal a prohibition on petitioning/leafletting/demonstrating in certain designated areas while another permitted event is in progress: Passed by the Board.

- Item 12 — Efficiency dwelling units square footage (building code amendment): Continued at the request of Supervisor Wiener to a later meeting date (rescheduled to November 20 per motion on the floor).

- Items 13–14 — Airport bond appropriations: Ordinance appropriating $543,200,000 and resolution approving issuance of up to $502,200,000 of Airport Commission capital plan bonds: Passed on first reading and adopted as a resolution, per committee report.

- Item 15 — Union Square Garage lease amendment: Resolution approving and authorizing an amendment to the Union Square Garage lease: Adopted.

- Items 16–19 — Grants and contract amendments: Multiple resolutions retroactively accepting a CDC grant for the STOP Study (approx. $748,000), and authorizing fifth and third amendments to existing technology contracts (increasing contract limits)—all adopted on the consent calendar as recorded.

- Item 21 — Police code penalties for closed properties (foreclosed properties): Ordinance designating certain foreclosed properties as public nuisances and allowing enhanced penalties for owners of many foreclosed properties who do not abate nuisances; passed on first reading (11 ayes).

- Items 26–28 — Reappointments to the Public Utilities Commission: Motions approving the mayor’s reappointments (Anne Moller Caine, Francesca Viateaur II, Vince Courtney) were approved by roll call (11 ayes).

- Items 31–24 (Successor Agency): The Board voted to convene as a Committee of the Whole to consider successor-agency items; the successor-agency ordinance was passed on first reading as amended (vote recorded as 10 ayes, 1 no). See separate coverage for details on the successor-agency debate and amendments.

How the Board handled votes

Most consent and routine items were acted on by single roll-call votes. Items that drew debate — notably the oversized-vehicle parking ordinance (see separate coverage) and the successor-agency ordinance — received extended discussion and amendments before passage on first reading. Several items were continued for scheduling or clarification on a motion from the floor (for example, Item 12 was continued to November 20). The transcript records roll-call tallies for many items; where a specific tally was recorded in the transcript it is reported above.

What this means for residents and city operations

- Appropriations for Clean Power SF: The appropriation to create a customer reserve fund gives the city’s Clean Power SF program an enhanced contingency fund for community-choice aggregation work at the Public Utilities Commission.

- Airport bonds: Large bond issuances for the Airport Commission move capital projects forward; budget and project oversight will be managed through the Airport Commission and Controller processes.

- Foreclosed properties ordinance: The new authority will enable the city to seek enhanced penalties for owners of numerous neglected foreclosed properties that create blight and public-nuisance conditions.

The Board’s calendar included many additional routine appointments, contract amendments and departmental grant acceptances. Items that passed on first reading will come back for final passage or further committee action as required by city rules.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Sanfrancisco Government tv - 134855640009/25/12 - Apr 16, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","At its September meeting the Board approved multiple consent items and voted on ordinances and resolutions including Clean Power SF fund appropriation, parking-tax code changes and bond measures for the airport. Several individual items were acted on by roll call.","taxTitle","San Francisco County, California","taxId",2862,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":46,"_47":80,"_49":81,"_51":82,"_53":83,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":84,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":85,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6601223,"Board adopts successor-agency ordinance on first reading after amendments amid calls for added oversight",6650,4150000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3005987-bfcb8e2036fea741971fda684244cadb&start=4150&end=10800","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3005987-bfcb8e2036fea741971fda684244cadb/thumbnail_4150000.jpg","/articles/6601223/San-Francisco-County/California/Board-adopts-successor-agency-ordinance-on-first-reading-after-amendments-amid-calls-for-added-oversight","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6601223-2b99295c01f2b9680658db12b715da43/orig.mp4?Expires=1771174520&Signature=iPl~dk-m66Q73cxtlssYlNFtRwVNPgAeAgUSyb~ZETMGdwXiEvwANU-jCct~A~2WV6LrJG0E5cDydfrDbWRQbaoZWWHgRxWToCfiUkqlHpo~GVMwbTdsvHJ0~hscaghdRTCpmKwCwvv8LlyDX1HKx8zWvDx76~9p075W25CgAvv1W6p51-AQZ6P6bc-1Pa9r~IrjXdoBQ2MwhjWqBqDhx1Qoq9qzyYaybf9LLvORJmUPseY4ipZAhQ4ZnlEdenGRV9-jlP1wg8jLoF8u~SlI~Bdhdlm0UXe7FzIi0nEKRgPxeJa7Kgu3tNhihziR-pKdZsWhhGLBmkF5sCCanyZ2jg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The San Francisco Board of Supervisors approved, on first reading and as amended, an ordinance creating a separate successor agency commission to wind down enforceable obligations left after the state dissolved redevelopment agencies. The measure lays out the commission’s narrow role — completing surviving obligations connected to major project areas such as Mission Bay, Transbay and the Hunters Point Shipyard — and addresses governance, staffing and fiduciary procedures under the amended state dissolution law (AB 1484).

City Administrator Naomi Kelly opened the Committee-of-the-Whole discussion with a summary of the legal constraints placed on the city after the state’s redevelopment-dissolution statutes changed in 2012. Tiffany Bohi, director of the City’s successor agency office, told the Board the ordinance creates a focused commission to complete long-term affordable housing and infrastructure obligations that remain in the recognized obligations payment schedules (ROPS) and to coordinate with the existing Oversight Board and the State Department of Finance.

The Board’s deliberations centered on the balance of executive and legislative authority, representation from project-area communities, the commission’s delegation powers and transparency. Supervisor Cohen — a co-sponsor of the ordinance as amended — told the Board the commission’s scope should remain narrow and that the Board of Supervisors must retain budgetary review authority. Supervisor Campos pressed for split appointments or more direct supervisor involvement to strengthen local accountability. Several speakers from Bayview-Hunters Point, Mission Bay and housing and civic organizations urged speedy action so major projects and promised affordable housing can proceed.

Amendments adopted during the hearing clarified three main points: first, the Board retained explicit review and approval authority over the successor agency’s operational budget; second, material amendments to redevelopment plans or community-benefit commitments must be returned to the Board of Supervisors for its consideration; and third, the successor agency was directed to deliver a clear road map to the Board within 120 days describing staffing, governance and implementation steps to complete enforceable obligations. The Board also adopted a separate change creating at least two seats on the successor commission that reflect the project-area constituencies (as amended, the commission should include representatives tied to the supervisorial districts that contain the major project areas).

A proposal by Supervisor Campos to strike language in the draft that permits the commission to delegate any of its duties to an executive director drew extended debate. Supporters of the delegation language argued it is consistent with existing city practice and necessary for efficient administration; opponents warned that unconstrained delegation could remove oversight from a public, appointed body. The Board voted and the proposal to delete the delegation clause failed. A motion to require the city to return with further clarifying language and to preserve Board oversight of collective bargaining and budget decisions was included in the adopted amendments.

Public comment was lengthy and divided: community speakers from Bayview-Hunters Point and Mission Bay urged that community voices be represented and that former redevelopment employees not automatically control the successor agency; the Chamber of Commerce and business groups urged a single agency to maintain continuity so projects and private investments can proceed; nonprofit housing and neighborhood groups asked the Board to preserve long-standing community benefits and contract compliance structures.

The Board considered, but rejected, a short continuance motion. Subsequent roll calls adopted the suite of amendments reported to the Board and then passed the ordinance as amended on first reading (final recorded vote on the ordinance as amended: 10 ayes, 1 no). The Board scheduled return steps and directed the successor agency to produce the 120-day roadmap and to follow the reporting and budget-approval steps outlined in the amendments.

What the ordinance does and does not do: the commission is expressly limited to completing surviving enforceable obligations and the ordinance acknowledges the continuing role of the Oversight Board and the State Department of Finance in reviewing recognized obligations payment schedules. The ordinance permits the successor commission to select an executive director and handle personnel matters for the successor agency entity; the Board’s adopted amendment preserves Board authority over final adoption of the successor agency’s annual budget and requires Board review for material changes to redevelopment plans or community-benefit commitments.

Next steps: successor agency staff will prepare the 120-day roadmap for Board review, confirm staffing and personnel arrangements consistent with AB 1484 and the ROPS process, and continue collaboration with the Oversight Board and state finance reviewers.","The Board of Supervisors approved on first reading an ordinance establishing a successor agency commission to complete development and affordable-housing obligations left after redevelopment dissolution, adding amendments to preserve Board budget oversight and require plan amendment review and a 120-day implementation roadmap.",{"_33":87,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":88,"_41":89,"_43":90,"_45":91,"_47":92,"_49":93,"_51":94,"_53":95,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":96,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":97,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6601228,"Supervisors approve targeted overnight limits on oversized vehicle parking with implementation delays and study requirements",3114,488000,3602000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3005987-bfcb8e2036fea741971fda684244cadb&start=488&end=3602","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3005987-bfcb8e2036fea741971fda684244cadb/thumbnail_488000.jpg","/articles/6601228/San-Francisco-County/California/Supervisors-approve-targeted-overnight-limits-on-oversized-vehicle-parking-with-implementation-delays-and-study-requirements","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6601228-454065908bf10c974014b76399074db6/orig.mp4?Expires=1771174520&Signature=mZ6Zb-zaNR5HXnz-5SVZ4byU~wK1gNNP9ks3BcK3HodYkLCaaLgj~bCdYUNiysXo31jBJxgDhdYcBqSwVOU6Cz6FHfLO~aFwbMrGiMpQwXg7xCwms~uuAobBcPmQOCYwqVgIpxcvDtMJfUYJnAHtLzUSb-3ekfrCrhVykeoScibavrCzloSCiHtF19xL7luFuHyCERaDqQBBfYVc6aEJzfLl8sNjr4xw2Jp3OChXBl997FIt0RGgmHtVaDCZRnLg7BpW12NgCJ4EFuuyhTke5u6GJiJ~1LBbLPh2K1l9Setm0~W-i076izYkCF0e13OnUCLNI91uvIxuqE7tsBw7cg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Members of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors voted to approve on first reading an ordinance that lets the Municipal Transportation Agency (MTA) post signs to prohibit overnight parking of oversized vehicles between 12 a.m. and 6 a.m. in locations the agency identifies as chronically impacted. The vote followed extensive debate about enforcement, impacts on people living in vehicles, and required study and transition services.

The measure defines oversized vehicles using the California Vehicle Code thresholds Supervisor Chu recited at the hearing — vehicles over 22 feet in length or 7 feet in height, and examples including camp trailers, fifth-wheel travel trailers, house cars, trailer coaches, mobile homes, recreational vehicles and semi-trailers. “I do want to say that this is a parking issue that we are talking about here,” Supervisor Chu told colleagues after describing MTA’s analysis showing many vehicles were registered within San Francisco but parked outside the owner’s neighborhood.

A package of amendments led by President Chu and seconded by Supervisor Campos earned board approval before the final vote. Those amendments push the ordinance’s operative date to March 1, 2013, and require the mayor’s Office on Housing Opportunity, Partnership and Engagement (HOPE), in coordination with the MTA, to take a set of preparatory steps before implementation. The list includes an assessment to determine how many oversized vehicles are inhabited and the collection of demographic information on inhabitants; study of potential vehicle-storage options and private partnerships (Treas ure Island and CityView Storage were discussed as possible pilot locations); tracking of transitions of people to city services; and a return to the Board in roughly 90 days with findings and an implementation plan.

Bevan Dufty, director of the mayor’s HOPE office, told the Board his office will pilot a vehicle-storage option — working with CityView Storage on Treasure Island to hold a very small number of vehicles for a limited period while occupants accept case management. Dr. Vivek Parikh, clinical director of the Department of Public Health homeless outreach team, described vehicularly housed people as a difficult-to-engage population and said the agency supports storage pilots and intensive outreach designed to encourage transitions into stabilized housing and services.

Supervisors across the chamber acknowledged concerns raised by homeless advocates and asked for safeguards. Supervisor Olague and others urged delaying implementation until the city can show adequate storage and stabilization capacity; supporters said the delay in the ordinance and required reportbacks are designed to create that capacity and monitor unintended consequences.

Board action on the amendments: the Chu/Campos amendment package passed (8 ayes, 3 noes). A separate amendment offered by Supervisor Olague that would have made implementation contingent on a more fulsome analysis failed (4 ayes, 7 noes). On the underlying ordinance as amended, the roll call showed 7 ayes and 4 noes and the ordinance passed first reading as amended.

The Board and agency staff emphasized the local, targeted nature of the tool — the MTA will not impose a citywide ban but will post signs in specific chronically impacted locations after consultation with supervisors’ offices. Supervisors and agency staff said the MTA will coordinate with local supervisor offices, do outreach prior to posting signs and monitor whether restrictions simply push problems to adjacent blocks.

What happens next: the ordinance’s operative date was moved to March 1, 2013 to allow time for the HOPE office and MTA to complete the assessment and establish pilot storage and transition programs. The mayor’s office and MTA are required to report to the Board on findings within the 90-day window specified in the amendments. Dufty told the Board the pilot storage arrangement under discussion would store a handful of vehicles for up to three months while families or individuals engage with case management; specifics of capacity and expansion will be part of the reportback.

Speakers and sources in the public record included representatives from the mayor’s HOPE office and the Department of Public Health’s Homeless Outreach Team, as well as supervisors whocosponsored and debated the ordinance. The MTA emphasized that enforcement of the existing 72-hour rule and other city codes remains available; the new sign authority is an additional targeted enforcement tool.

The Board’s materials and the adopted amendments instruct city agencies to prioritize humane implementation that does not displace people without offering alternatives. The Board required return reporting so supervisors can evaluate whether sign-based controls improve neighborhood conditions without unacceptable harm to people living in vehicles.","The Board of Supervisors voted to approve an ordinance allowing the Municipal Transportation Agency to post overnight parking restrictions for oversized vehicles in chronically impacted blocks, while adding a delayed effective date and requirements for city agencies to assess the population and services for people living in vehicles.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Board passes a slate of ordinances, advances bond and contract approvals; summary of key votes

Board adopts successor-agency ordinance on first reading after amendments amid calls for added oversight

Supervisors approve targeted overnight limits on oversized vehicle parking with implementation delays and study requirements