Fillmore Center Associates appeals denial of condominium maps to San Francisco Board

The San Francisco Board of Supervisors convened on April 16, 2025, to discuss significant issues surrounding the Fillmore Center development, specifically the appeals regarding the approval of tentative subdivision maps for Blocks 731 and 750. The meeting highlighted a contentious debate over the historical context of the Fillmore Center project and its implications for future development in the city.

During the session, attorney representing Fillmore Center Associates argued that the denial of the subdivision maps is an attempt to renegotiate a deal established 23 years ago by the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency. He emphasized that the city has historically recognized the Fillmore Center as a condominium project, which was built under specific rental conditions. The attorney expressed concerns that the current city staff's stance reflects a shift in political expectations that could undermine developer confidence in San Francisco's stability as a place for investment.

The attorney pointed out that the Fillmore Center has provided significant benefits to the city, including the creation of over 1,100 homes, with 20% designated as affordable housing. He argued that denying the maps would send a negative message to developers, potentially stifling future housing projects in areas like Treasure Island and Bayview-Hunters Point.

City officials, including representatives from the Planning Department and the City Attorney's Office, countered that the project must adhere to current city regulations and policies aimed at protecting existing rental housing. They argued that the city’s general plan prioritizes the retention of rental units over the conversion to ownership units, emphasizing the need to maintain affordable housing stock in a city facing a housing crisis.

The discussion also touched on the historical context of the Fillmore Center, with references to past redevelopment efforts and the challenges faced in the area. The board ultimately voted to approve some items related to the project while tabling others for further consideration, indicating the complexity of the issues at hand.

The outcome of this meeting could have lasting implications for the Fillmore Center and similar redevelopment projects in San Francisco, as the board navigates the balance between historical agreements and current housing policies. The potential for litigation looms as stakeholders prepare to respond to the board's decisions.