San Francisco Board denies CEQA appeal for Grant Street high-density project

The San Francisco Board of Supervisors convened on April 16, 2025, to discuss a significant urban development project at 333 Grant Street, focusing on compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The meeting began with a presentation by project representative Miss Campbell, who acknowledged the challenges of constructing a new building in a densely populated area, emphasizing the project's compatibility with the existing urban environment.

Following the presentation, several public speakers voiced their opinions. Vincent Marsh, representing the Friends of 1800 Market Street, supported the project, highlighting its adherence to the guidelines of Article 10 and the extensive refinements made to its design. He urged the board to deny the appeal against the project, asserting that it meets the necessary standards for approval.

Tim Cohen from the San Francisco Housing Action Coalition also spoke in favor of the project, arguing against the misuse of CEQA appeals in this context. He contended that the project aligns with the city's goals for high-density urban infill and should be approved without further obstruction.

In contrast, appellant Sue Hester raised concerns about the implications of height limits and zoning standards, arguing that the planning department's approach encourages maximum height proposals without adequate analysis of their impact on sunlight and neighborhood integrity. She criticized the lack of attention to the consequences of such developments, framing it as a critical CEQA issue.

After public comments concluded, Supervisor Ellsburn moved to approve the project, citing that the mitigated negative declaration adequately addressed the appellants' concerns. The motion was seconded and subsequently passed with a roll call vote, resulting in the denial of the appeal and approval of the project.

The meeting underscored the ongoing tension between urban development and community concerns, with the board's decision reflecting a commitment to advancing housing initiatives while navigating the complexities of environmental regulations. The approval marks a significant step forward for the project, with implications for future urban planning in San Francisco.