[{"_1":2,"_111":-5,"_112":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87,99],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6601989,"mediaKeyId","3005759-993c076c3d0c730443d5106282295fc4","parentId",3005759,"title","Board approves multiple ordinances and resolutions in May 15 consent calendar; several items passed without debate","audioSeconds",6789,"startMs",137000,"endMs",6926000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=3005759-993c076c3d0c730443d5106282295fc4&start=137&end=6926","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3005759-993c076c3d0c730443d5106282295fc4/thumbnail_137000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6601989/San-Francisco-County/California/Board-approves-multiple-ordinances-and-resolutions-in-May-15-consent-calendar-several-items-passed-without-debate","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6601989-e867befc55b869029edff39ee456ae9d/orig.mp4?Expires=1772833975&Signature=GTBu~cmzIpn9nYtA6ikmBRtJ1PLCC8tSMznPrpHnf-Ve7GdPxYGsqzBfAg7b00-FHHPqoZEM1yzpPHyUrYwSJeM6C3IlywhP~LYuL1YuCCEznpBaV3N8cLivKizMOV9Xj9BPfNaXlbEcpBdqvSOqRR6JYUF-FpIqvab3HYZBsyNlFmcQnnor2Ck1hrbXdVWop607M9xqQn4DJVGWxiD18etF3lDUZj-wRxq2pxDcg7KrBpLW7PLfSVpJ1KPtWkvgCYldRj4qQNZssIuDXdkfj3NnuoOLH8yCdtuUpMGCUaK22lW6oo4YvLjI-wTBPypMmwwQiMxMGOAQM7USXauuGA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Sanfrancisco Government tv","date","2025-04-16T01:57:00Z","article","The San Francisco Board of Supervisors on May 15 approved a large consent and adoption calendar encompassing ordinances, grant acceptances and multiple resolutions, advancing public-health staffing changes, bond and financing authorizations, property transactions and other routine matters.

Key outcomes from the meeting’s consent and adoption calendar included:

- Ordinance amending an earlier ordinance to reflect Department of Economic and Workforce Development changes (Item 8) was finally passed on roll call, 8 ayes and 3 noes.

- The Department of Public Health was authorized to retroactively accept and expend a federal grant of $373,600.19 (Item 9); the clerk recorded the item as adopted on roll call.

- A package of Department of Public Health staffing and grant actions passed, including an ordinance adding four positions and authorizing a $241,225 grant from the California HealthCare Foundation (Item 15), and an ordinance adding six positions at the Tom Waddell Health Center and authorizing a $1,840,000 grant for oral health services (Item 16). These items were recorded as passed on roll call.

- The board adopted resolutions authorizing the sale of surplus land at 849 Cesar Chavez Street (Item 12), approving issuance of tax-exempt bonds by ABAG Finance Authority (Item 13) and declaring intent to reimburse certain expenditures from future bond proceeds for supportive housing at 275 Tenth Street (Item 14).

- A resolution approving the purchase of real property at 4–8 Guy Place for public open space for $1,800,000 was adopted (Item 17).

- Changes to advisory-board membership and the creation of a peak-oil preparedness task force were adopted (Items 19 and 20).

- Several items called from committee were approved: a staffing adjustment motion (Item 26) was approved; an ordinance adjusting administrative services staffing was passed on first reading (Item 21).

- Item 23, a proposed ordinance that would appropriate $19,719,628 for programs serving children, seniors and people with disabilities, was continued to the board’s June 5 meeting at the request of Supervisor Daly.

- The board adopted an \"adoption without committee reference\" calendar (Items 27–39) by unanimous vote with one absence; Supervisor Daly severed Item 34 and asked that Item 38 be continued one week to allow research on a final map.

Many of these items were presented as routine by the clerk and acted on in single roll-call votes. A small number of items drew debate and were taken separately; the board used a mix of roll-call votes and unanimous voice adoption consistent with customary consent-calendar procedures.

Votes and outcomes recorded in the transcript (selected):
- Item 8 (ordinance amendment reflecting Economic and Workforce Development): finally passed; roll-call: 8 ayes, 3 noes.
- Item 9 (DPH grant $373,600.19): adopted on roll call (aye votes recorded by clerk).
- Item 15 (DPH — 4 positions + $241,225 grant): passed on roll call (clerk recorded multiple ayes).
- Item 16 (Tom Waddell Health Center — 6 positions + $1,840,000 grant): passed on roll call (11 ayes recorded by clerk).
- Item 18 (Candlestick/Hunters Point framework): adopted (see separate coverage).
- Item 23 (appropriation $19,719,628): continued to June 5; motion made by Supervisor Daly, seconded by Supervisor Duffy.
- Items 27–39: adopted on the adoption-without-committee calendar except as noted; Item 34 was severed for separate consideration and Item 38 was continued one week at Supervisor McGoldrick’s request.

Several items on the calendar were described by the clerk as \"same house, same call,\" indicating unanimous or consent adoption when no supervisor requested separate consideration. Where the transcript records a roll call, the clerk announced the tally; where the clerk read \"same house, same call,\" no separate roll-call tally was read in the transcript.

The calendar moves forward a range of administrative and programmatic actions for city departments; items that were continued or severed will return for additional committee review or a subsequent board meeting.

","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Sanfrancisco Government tv - 117921240005/15/07 - Apr 16, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","The Board of Supervisors approved a broad consent and adoption calendar on May 15, advancing ordinances, grant acceptances and multiple resolutions affecting public-health staffing, financing and property transactions.","taxTitle","San Francisco County, California","taxId",2862,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6601980,"Patients and operators urge supervisors to adopt nonbinding compassionate-services resolution and ease local permit rules for medical cannabis",1596,3752000,5348000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3005759-993c076c3d0c730443d5106282295fc4&start=3752&end=5348","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3005759-993c076c3d0c730443d5106282295fc4/thumbnail_3752000.jpg","/articles/6601980/San-Francisco-County/California/Patients-and-operators-urge-supervisors-to-adopt-nonbinding-compassionate-services-resolution-and-ease-local-permit-rules-for-medical-cannabis","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6601980-b4202e48d93cbf5e8c2b73f08602f829/orig.mp4?Expires=1772833975&Signature=Hcpgs~3U5kShagcdw0AhDVSBiMYssyvQ1H4fjuDck9mCtR6C563PZtgvyXbDb91mGGuIE6HNOGUxb7-aztJjJWwBCLEOmVIL9KMl3EQRfrC5h4mBtheglD2QLn8wj3uLBWJePp8P7L1FV90gxO3hhQJiUABooh5BW6JrMX0mnIZTtsZK6TylP-wEc0fPaCfiwp9ubpJhwqFmwTvCtGD1lcM8-p7drXw1Zi15WjMHsybnfWcgaeogBsBT05RRevhnVPEGuo3cBEBcJW02BW6aSX3z2ZkC4LfVPOScYnXVsp5hoy1zz15kIbDI6ISk2zYOW~hEh6HHQGv5LP2jveSXMA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Multiple patients, dispensary operators and advocates used the public-comment period at the May 15 San Francisco Board of Supervisors meeting to press the board for changes to the city\u0000s medical cannabis (MCD) permitting policy and to urge adoption of a nonbinding compassionate-services resolution.

Speakers representing collectives, patient-advocacy groups and individual patients described several recurring concerns: that the state-issued medical-cannabis identification card is voluntary under state law and should not be mandatory for local access; that many patients fear registering because of possible federal or employment consequences; that police sign-off in the city permit process has been a barrier for at least one collective; and that the city should formally encourage \"compassionate services\" programs to make medicine affordable for low- and no-income patients.

Operators and advocates outlined practical alternatives and made specific requests. The operator Marv Walpa told the board the state card is voluntary and proposed that dispensaries be allowed to verify physician recommendations by telephone for patients who do not hold state cards. Walpa said he estimated roughly 70 percent of dispensary patients would fall into the category of not holding a state card.

Representatives of collectives, including the San Francisco Patients Cooperative and HopeNet, described long-standing local compassionate programs and urged the board to adopt a nonbinding resolution to protect and encourage similar programs citywide. \"The compassionate service be something that is not going to impact the neighborhood,\" said Reverend Randolyn Webster, urging that programs be designed so as not to cause neighborhood disruption.

Kathy Smith, proprietor of HopeNet, said the police department had told her it would not sign off on the collective\u0000s permit and asked the board to remove police sign-off from the local permitting requirement so collectives can complete the local process. Other speakers called for confidentiality protections for patients and for local processes that would not force patients to obtain a state card if they fear reprisal.

Several speakers described cost and access problems. One speaker, Gilbert, who identified himself as a disabled veteran, told the board medical cannabis can be prohibitively expensive for people on fixed incomes; another commenter urged that compassionate services protect patients from federal enforcement by documenting internal policies.

No formal board action on MCD permitting or the nonbinding compassionate-services resolution was recorded during the meeting; the discussion appeared during public comment and in sponsor-introduced items related to permitting. Advocates said they will continue to press the board and relevant departments for regulatory changes and for adoption of a local, nonbinding resolution supporting compassionate services for low-income patients.

","During an extended public-comment period at the San Francisco Board of Supervisors meeting on May 15, patients, advocates and dispensary operators urged the board to adopt a nonbinding compassionate-services resolution, treat state medical-cannabis ID cards as voluntary and remove police sign-off from the local permitting process.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6601994,"Board endorses conceptual framework for Candlestick Point and Hunters Point redevelopment; calls for community monitoring of contamination risks",515,574000,1089000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3005759-993c076c3d0c730443d5106282295fc4&start=574&end=1089","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3005759-993c076c3d0c730443d5106282295fc4/thumbnail_574000.jpg","/articles/6601994/San-Francisco-County/California/Board-endorses-conceptual-framework-for-Candlestick-Point-and-Hunters-Point-redevelopment-calls-for-community-monitoring-of-contamination-risks","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6601994-c383a335ee7c94e31396d9a3e28f6f90/orig.mp4?Expires=1772833975&Signature=lPZ4dEdIQgbmkzQ4vqv6yG6J41TSJdN0jSGgzelaes7NwR-iek7O9karBpkH4WSJI~XhBDJnCWHljbxkVvJQoV2XL3svN62LF2RtNGQz4jcb1VhqhD8tFTMVnvWHPgNEBQMFmDXj26HDvpngPoPwP-odt78tk21mQxsMiGL1~zQv4DRClQ0711IkRImg1feokUkQ5M8upBp1TeP9rB3wuKo4nn6SvIoGQ6~Vlue2x-SmXI3Bk5mVVlD8gFvKNMPi4-7CNaBp1JOMo8dk-0f4QYHKh~MiPSTdaJ1yGo2ll99vA0LJRSur8NFSHW58Tivuh2-C8HQbMScN3wLWSAgE8g__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The San Francisco Board of Supervisors on May 15 adopted a resolution endorsing a conceptual framework for the redevelopment of Candlestick Point and the Hunters Point Shipyard, approving further planning work that could include mixed-use housing, parks, jobs and — optionally — a new stadium for the San Francisco 49ers.

The resolution, introduced by Supervisor Maxwell and described to the board as a two-year planning framework, passed after debate, 9 to 2. Supporters said the framework prioritizes public benefits for the Bayview-Hunters Point community; opponents warned the plan is too broad and raised questions about oversight and environmental safety.

The framework’s backers told the board the plan has been presented in multiple community meetings and incorporates community feedback. \"This framework includes mixed use development that will provide affordable housing, parks, open space, jobs, and other public benefits,\" Supervisor Maxwell said during her remarks. She also said developers and planners have met with community groups and that about 25 community meetings had been held.

Opponents and several supervisors pressed for stronger safeguards after Supervisor Sandoval described a committee briefing in which air-pollutant monitors at the shipyard had failed for months. Sandoval said the site contains naturally occurring asbestos that can be released during grading and that the community lost confidence when monitors stopped operating. \"If this project is going to be successful over the long term, we absolutely have to have the trust of the community,\" Sandoval said. She urged a mechanism that would allow community-led monitoring, paid for by project sponsors if necessary.

Supervisor Ju said he would not support the resolution because of its scope and fiscal consequences, and because a petition to put the plan on the ballot is being litigated in court. He objected to language in the resolution that ratified actions taken by city staff consistent with the intent of the resolution, calling that provision too broad. Deputy City Attorney Cheryl Adams told the board the ratification language is standard in items of this type.

Supervisor Mercarini urged a parallel discussion about the governance of the Redevelopment Agency, saying that broader structural changes might be the correct response to long-running concerns about redevelopment oversight.

After discussion the board took a roll call vote. The clerk recorded nine ayes and two noes; the resolution was adopted.

The resolution endorses continuing the planning process over roughly two years and directs city staff to pursue the framework with additional community engagement and technical study. Supporters said the next steps include further environmental review and continued community meetings; opponents said the board should maintain tight oversight at each stage.

Clarifying details cited during discussion included that approximately 25 community meetings had already been held, the sponsor asked for a two-year planning process, and that the framework explicitly includes the possibility of a stadium for the San Francisco 49ers but frames public benefits (affordable housing, parks, jobs) as primary. Supervisor Sandoval identified a specific environmental concern: monitors for airborne pollutants at the shipyard had not been operating for a period of months prior to committee review, and the site contains naturally occurring asbestos that could be disturbed during grading.

What’s next: the mayor’s office and the redevelopment agency were asked to continue outreach and technical studies; the resolution does not enact specific land-use approvals but endorses a planning process that will include further analysis and public hearings.

","The San Francisco Board of Supervisors on May 15 adopted a resolution endorsing a conceptual framework for redeveloping Candlestick Point and the Hunters Point Shipyard, approving a two-year planning process that could include mixed-use housing, parks and a possible stadium.",{"_33":100,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":101,"_41":102,"_43":103,"_45":104,"_47":105,"_49":106,"_51":107,"_53":108,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":109,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":110,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6601985,"Board continues $19.7 million appropriation for children, seniors and disabled programs to June 5 as supervisors await mayoral budget",846,1254000,2100000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3005759-993c076c3d0c730443d5106282295fc4&start=1254&end=2100","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3005759-993c076c3d0c730443d5106282295fc4/thumbnail_1254000.jpg","/articles/6601985/San-Francisco-County/California/Board-continues-197-million-appropriation-for-children-seniors-and-disabled-programs-to-June-5-as-supervisors-await-mayoral-budget","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6601985-0b7e4f03dce0ae70dcf8625612318ea7/orig.mp4?Expires=1772833975&Signature=ZsIAt3HLEsSE0DJ~u5BYp8ANBU~vNg0SM28zxbAWXbihRM8-ljN3qPtVwWSAAjlT-B2qJombsoPxRscLBkz8d8rcqNk-TRC5LB7MDR7J7Bz3~vxh7qM8aBDGOKcMEtr8BAHu0rktVVsDe6z1HS8nMY~d~bkwmGiPooZV3KVRWHT0HdrfClVSqgNA8nxuWk9FKS5ePLYShmpnPxfe8PovqG2YHlFw0LA4otz9KQ7mSBfhQC9dYm-3vg4qBhP81hV0FIc3JRCAJjeYXqPANvfWKfEeo36pCaypaIvedmuoieTAsGkj0LqhtT2tVL6mWIkkM2LbvhPRJUkUQlrl2OHqjg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The San Francisco Board of Supervisors on May 15 voted to continue an ordinance that would appropriate $19,719,628 for programs serving children, seniors and people with disabilities until its next regular meeting on June 5.

Supervisor Chris Daly, speaking for the Budget and Finance Committee package, said the funding proposal addresses senior services and programming for families and youth. Daly said he would seek a continuance until the mayor’s formal June 1 budget submission so the board and mayor could consider the measures together rather than acting now.

Daly referenced related budget tensions between the board and the mayor’s office, including a separate dispute over a $28 million affordable-housing supplemental the board had appropriated and a mayoral letter describing the funds as unavailable. Daly urged the mayor and board to hold formal policy discussions to avoid an escalation that could delay housing and services. \"The money is available,\" Daly said in reference to the supplemental appropriations; he urged convening to resolve issues around timing and release of funds.

After Daly’s remarks Supervisor Daly moved to continue Items (including Item 23) to the June 5 meeting; Supervisor Duffy seconded. The motion was approved without objection and the ordinance was continued.

Clarifying details from the agenda: the ordinance as read by the clerk listed an appropriation amount of $19,719,628 for children, senior and disabled programs. The committee report on the package came out without recommendation. The motion to continue was made to allow time for alignment with the mayor’s forthcoming budget submission and to receive any additional information the committee wanted prior to action.

What’s next: Item 23 will return to the board on June 5 after the mayor submits the balanced budget on June 1, at which point supervisors said they expect to weigh whether the package is included in the mayor’s proposal or requires separate board action.

","Supervisor Daly moved to continue an ordinance proposing $19,719,628 in appropriations for children, senior and disabled programs to the board\u0000s June 5 meeting so the package can be considered with the mayor\u0000s June 1 budget submission. The board approved the continuance without objection.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Board approves multiple ordinances and resolutions in May 15 consent calendar; several items passed without debate

Patients and operators urge supervisors to adopt nonbinding compassionate-services resolution and ease local permit rules for medical cannabis

Board endorses conceptual framework for Candlestick Point and Hunters Point redevelopment; calls for community monitoring of contamination risks

Board continues $19.7 million appropriation for children, seniors and disabled programs to June 5 as supervisors await mayoral budget