[{"_1":2,"_111":-5,"_112":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87,99],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6602022,"mediaKeyId","3005743-635fbe3760bf4774811a8315703aed96","parentId",3005743,"title","Board approves tentative five-unit condominium map at 318–920 First Street, tables disapproval motion","audioSeconds",980,"startMs",4735000,"endMs",5715000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=3005743-635fbe3760bf4774811a8315703aed96&start=4735&end=5715","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3005743-635fbe3760bf4774811a8315703aed96/thumbnail_4735000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6602022/San-Francisco-County/California/Board-approves-tentative-five-unit-condominium-map-at-318920-First-Street-tables-disapproval-motion","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6602022-6398d9dcc4a56979eea3b382391aa536/orig.mp4?Expires=1775040318&Signature=ddIEk4UbmxHa9TnJqhz3gBmJWq4uYuZHL-6IPelt8wYa6HsxGTRqUTJBJ~j96~QK1CJi09iUs4G4Lr278m6R4L~soogdW51hMXiyqRO2MaOVXBcQRI6dtvV6pzQdkpouLO9WJbAxo6x3hl2eAnweAEkftjJ3vgBl86eY6arDjOmP3F23ps3iVqA34s-PewCSMNDOwDx4~uRDgBM094rSdfIrxcN7Hnljzvezws22msY6Fn-5rgmznaJmc~srQkto-CGJHFWB-bREwEOwea2Ns7Vl4maGrvQD~I5rEbPcmaCCZcqfaUbAsRu0F31zYaVF2s5I8rTk9mUPgl1IBi9gQg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Sanfrancisco Government tv","date","2025-04-16T02:33:00Z","article","The San Francisco Board of Supervisors approved a tentative final map that subdivides property at 318–920 First Street into five condominium units, and the board tabled a motion seeking disapproval after a public hearing that included neighbor testimony about drainage, light and privacy impacts.

The hearing featured testimony from an adjacent property owner who said a newly constructed six‑story building next door had funneled rainwater into her front lightwell, collected debris and reduced light and privacy for existing tenants. The Public Works representative and the project sponsor said the drainage issues predated construction and that building and planning review occurred during the permitting process.

Department of Public Works staff told the board the tentative map complied with required approvals and neighborhood notifications. The project sponsor said the parking-lot drainage contributing to the lightwell condition existed before the current construction and that a drain — currently absent from the lightwell — would be needed to prevent water accumulation.

Action: Supervisor Ammiano moved to approve the director of public works’ decision (Item 16) and to direct the clerk to prepare findings (Item 18), while tabling the disapproval motion (Item 17). The board approved those items by roll call; the clerk recorded the motion as passing and the subsequent roll call as 11 ayes.

Implementation notes: the board’s action approved the subdivision map; separate building-code or drainage problems raised by the neighbor remain matters for the Department of Building Inspection and the property owner to resolve.

Ending: supervisors emphasized that the map decision is separate from remedying site-specific drainage and lightwell maintenance; the appellant and project sponsor were advised of administrative and building-inspection venues to pursue those technical issues.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Sanfrancisco Government tv - 117135360002/13/07 - Apr 16, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","After a public hearing in which a neighbor raised drainage, light and privacy complaints, the Board approved the Department of Public Works decision on a tentative final map for a five-unit condominium at 318–920 First Street and tabled a motion that would have disapproved it.","taxTitle","San Francisco County, California","taxId",2862,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6602026,"Board urges Monster Cable to negotiate severance and support laid-off Brisbane workers",877,1741000,2618000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3005743-635fbe3760bf4774811a8315703aed96&start=1741&end=2618","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3005743-635fbe3760bf4774811a8315703aed96/thumbnail_1741000.jpg","/articles/6602026/San-Francisco-County/California/Board-urges-Monster-Cable-to-negotiate-severance-and-support-laid-off-Brisbane-workers","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6602026-6bfc272857ff2c1a2b27a28517413554/orig.mp4?Expires=1775040318&Signature=Spe7oUgJ926EqoU2EncYeEofIr~WFKsLq1QqlN8bQYtxHsXjWmyEjGV0AsooEpmjICnaTtQkH~Fj-JgnEInqNbzH7UK8zkOt8dMbPsBIBgJf~aJKx4D1OtW80kcIXWWRDJqVLaR2I-cpXuvAm0ryQe9R-N4mXTVve~zuYTZdgIl0QvfQoT4zMmTYu1SBp6elUSdQ1KI2u~wNUZZqNVxIb8MAhvsF58ueRbi6g5IdtMlgTpnE2wGicPnm4fSg4abjQ15TcbKx7b1sSeHyJ3L8iHdAD0hz8DM0UpACSt4~gDJu~olAwUtkWYy3a7xB9zdWC13xlYaQZQouXnX05tyJmw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The San Francisco Board of Supervisors on Tuesday adopted a resolution urging Monster Cable Inc. to provide a fair severance package, health benefits and other assistance to more than 120 employees laid off at the company’s Brisbane facility.

Why it matters: supervisors framed the resolution as a labor and economic-justice measure for workers affected by outsourcing and corporate restructuring. Several supervisors said the company’s local ties — including naming rights to the city’s stadium — increase its responsibility to the community.

Debate and testimony: Supervisor McGoldrick and others described outreach the city has done to find jobs for displaced workers and pressed the company’s leadership to meet with employees. The board also received a letter from Noel Lee, Monster’s founder, criticizing the resolution and warning of reputational harm; supervisors replied that the board’s goal was to seek constructive solutions.

Points of contention: some supervisors objected to specific dollar amounts and benefits urged by the resolution, questioning whether a private company should be urged to match or exceed benefits the city provides its own displaced workers. Supervisor Ellsborg (sic in transcript) said urging a private company to provide $2 million for a workers’ fund and a year of health and dental could exceed municipal practices.

Action: the resolution was adopted; supervisors said they would continue outreach to find re-employment opportunities and encouraged the company to meet with affected workers and city employment agencies.

Ending: supporters said the resolution was intended to encourage engagement and practical assistance for displaced workers rather than to punish the employer. Several supervisors said their offices would keep working on job-placement and transitional assistance through city workforce programs.","The Board adopted a resolution urging Monster Cable Inc. to offer a fair severance package and support services for more than 120 laid-off workers from its Brisbane facility, after supervisors and affected workers described outreach and re-employment efforts.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6602031,"Supervisors back redevelopment plan concept for Candlestick Point and Hunters Point, add Alice Griffith replacement guarantee",212,1527000,1739000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3005743-635fbe3760bf4774811a8315703aed96&start=1527&end=1739","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3005743-635fbe3760bf4774811a8315703aed96/thumbnail_1527000.jpg","/articles/6602031/San-Francisco-County/California/Supervisors-back-redevelopment-plan-concept-for-Candlestick-Point-and-Hunters-Point-add-Alice-Griffith-replacement-guarantee","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6602031-f443d2a6345686c62537cb9083cabc58/orig.mp4?Expires=1775040318&Signature=Ab~c-S~XhFvNiNCtW81TXsBr-a0xzGf7H-~R1BauI4LkSaaPUB1xX3HM8881vhFSnxnGidNyqDoCNTvxbsdZe3Y55FYhiZba~xlorf32OW-FrkruB8G3APtTw4EnCEDLRieuuxVxfn5SD-Elt~3b48ZzbVR~uEOejxhx0Mrt0lp8R9Mv0llvZGaNFOP0Zfa6Ed0j~gOGmNjZrFjVGKvY15O2U9zkW1Zwfa-LKYHXG~glMRPDnH92Dm89DKu0jWmhEJLjO4OuxJiCWzChYo5CTwyLo8jDtrm0fi8bzsvf6gE1rZce9SM6P~p3OYXwkzbXuLOvEBuXp-gjQ~YAGRh23w__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The San Francisco Board of Supervisors on Tuesday adopted a resolution endorsing efforts by the Redevelopment Agency and Lennar Corporation to develop a conceptual proposal for mixed-use redevelopment at Candlestick Point and Hunters Point Shipyard, including the possibility of a new stadium and associated parking for the San Francisco 49ers. The resolution was adopted as amended to add protection for current residents of the Alice Griffith housing complex.

Why it matters: the resolution signals the city’s support for negotiating an integrated redevelopment vision that could include a stadium, parks, jobs and affordable housing at two major sites in Bayview–Hunters Point. Supervisors emphasized that redevelopment must guarantee tangible community benefits.

Amendment and debate: Supervisor Maxwell proposed — and the board adopted — an amendment requiring that any new development involving the Alice Griffith site must provide at least one-to-one replacement of existing low-income units and phase construction so current residents will not be displaced until replacement units are ready for occupancy. Maxwell said the language clarified that “affordable” in earlier drafts must include existing low-income levels.

Vote: the amended resolution passed on a roll call reported in the record as 8 ayes and 2 noes; the resolution was adopted as amended.

Supporting arguments and concerns: supporters said the integrated redevelopment offers an opportunity to deliver parks, jobs and affordable housing for Bayview–Hunters Point. Some residents who testified previously had asked for explicit protections for income-level replacement and anti-displacement measures; the amendment was crafted to address those concerns.

Next steps: the resolution urges the Redevelopment Agency to work with the city to amend its exclusive negotiation agreement with Lennar BVHP partners to pursue an integrated redevelopment covering Candlestick Point and the shipyard.

Ending: by approving the amendment and the resolution, the board formalized support for further negotiations while embedding a binding directive on replacement housing for Alice Griffith residents.","The Board adopted a resolution supporting conceptual redevelopment tied to a potential new stadium at Candlestick Point–Hunters Point and amended it to require one-for-one replacement of low-income units at Alice Griffith before displacement.",{"_33":100,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":101,"_41":102,"_43":103,"_45":104,"_47":105,"_49":106,"_51":107,"_53":108,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":109,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":110,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6602036,"Board delays vote on EarthLink–Google wireless proposal, seeks fuller analysis",1136,300000,1436000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3005743-635fbe3760bf4774811a8315703aed96&start=300&end=1436","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3005743-635fbe3760bf4774811a8315703aed96/thumbnail_300000.jpg","/articles/6602036/San-Francisco-County/California/Board-delays-vote-on-EarthLinkGoogle-wireless-proposal-seeks-fuller-analysis","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6602036-948f4be26a43a32cf726a1e3bb7ed687/orig.mp4?Expires=1775040318&Signature=PC~xWooNXl63cA6T9zGvblXY358J-97FpxVMAaHjmIAUdIh3X3k~WgGgb2N5KLot7LVfI4g5aVOcH4muRbN-l84qZzZywyJqxgSXxaXMwO8tesw0AhvaQY4hMEgi6JWbpoZyqUNxWvKdjV6Woejp8ewQcqf0hPZo6ScsgnxN8EDQalz-oIQ3HaYLv1-RaILKB4z2oKhyZ8j1Ga2RZFtGc~O303Yk1XQFaBaGBCTsZx43eR5e5hxyFfwzzzwVCMzPP5WRo9XsvbD77M9~N3kAGUMYsIuZ5QXeAUlj86LRzzsJPnY2j1iG~4DFpYIOLcwR-aNgU-PEZ5JaYmuvIi4tBA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The San Francisco Board of Supervisors voted Tuesday to continue consideration of a resolution urging the city to weigh costs and benefits of a proposed EarthLink–Google wireless Internet agreement until March 20, saying council members need more analysis and pending negotiations must finish before any final action.

Supervisors said they want time to review a recent budget analyst report and a city-commissioned fiber-to-the-premises study as they weigh the private agreement against options for a municipally owned broadband system. “This board is doing the people’s work,” Supervisor McGoldrick said during a lengthy floor debate, urging delay to allow a more thorough public review.

Why it matters: the item would shape how San Francisco expands broadband access and addresses the “digital divide.” Supporters of municipal broadband cited the budget analyst’s finding that a city-owned system could be more cost-effective in the long run; proponents of a public–private deal said the EarthLink–Google approach could deliver service sooner.

Key facts and debate: the board heard competing arguments: some supervisors said the mayor’s office and the Department of Telecommunications and Information Services (DITAS) had not provided adequate comparative analyses; others argued the city can pursue short-term wireless coverage while studying longer-term fiber options. Supervisor Ammiano and others pressed for hearings at committee level so the contract, the pole-use agreement and related technical materials could be reviewed together.

Chris Dien, director of the Department of Telecommunications and Information Services, told the board that one piece of the contractor package — an agreement with the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission over use of utility poles for mounting antennas — was still being negotiated and not yet complete. “You are correct, supervisor,” Dien said. “That agreement is currently being negotiated but has not been completed yet.” He said the board and the PUC would both have to approve the pole-use agreement before construction could begin.

Legal timing: supervisors debated whether the 180-day review period the city charter requires for certain contracts had begun. After staff conferred with the city attorney, the board was told the enforcement window does not begin until the pole agreement is concluded, a point that helped persuade members to delay action.

Action taken: the board approved a motion to continue the resolution to the March 20 meeting (continuance motion by Supervisor McGoldrick; second by Supervisor Mercarini). The roll call recorded the continuance as passing by a 6–5 vote.

Next steps: committee hearings and additional analyses were requested by multiple supervisors; members asked that the contract language, pole-use agreement and budget analyst findings be made available to committee and the public before the March 20 meeting so the board can consider alternatives — including a phased approach that could combine a short-term EarthLink–Google arrangement with later municipal fiber deployment.

Ending: with the item continued, supervisors said they expected fuller documentary evidence and the opportunity for public testimony and committee review before taking any final vote on the proposed agreement.","The San Francisco Board of Supervisors voted to continue consideration of a proposed EarthLink–Google wireless agreement to March 20 after supervisors pressed for more information, including a budget analyst report and details about pole-use negotiations.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Board approves tentative five-unit condominium map at 318–920 First Street, tables disapproval motion

Board urges Monster Cable to negotiate severance and support laid-off Brisbane workers

Supervisors back redevelopment plan concept for Candlestick Point and Hunters Point, add Alice Griffith replacement guarantee

Board delays vote on EarthLink–Google wireless proposal, seeks fuller analysis