Supervisor Kim questions DPW's handling of low-income condo conversion fee appeals

The San Francisco Board of Supervisors convened on April 16, 2025, to address a pressing issue regarding the condominium conversion expedition fee, which has become a significant financial burden for low-income tenant owners. The meeting focused on an appeal from a group of tenant owners seeking a waiver or reduction of the $16,000 fee, citing financial hardship and confusion over eligibility criteria.

During the session, the appellant explained that they had initially sought legal advice from two real estate lawyers, who indicated that low-income tenants might qualify for a complete waiver or reduction of the fee. However, after filing their appeal, they learned that the Department of Public Works (DPW) only offered a deferral option, which was not clearly communicated to them. The appellant expressed frustration over the lack of guidance from DPW, stating that they had to borrow money to pay the fee under pressure from other unit owners concerned about potential legal repercussions.

Supervisors Kim and Wiener voiced their dissatisfaction with DPW's handling of the situation, emphasizing the need for clearer communication regarding the options available to residents facing financial difficulties. They highlighted that referring constituents to the Board of Supervisors without providing adequate information about the appeal process was inefficient and frustrating for those seeking assistance.

The discussion revealed a broader issue within the city's processes, as several supervisors noted that many residents were left confused about their rights and options when it came to fee waivers or reductions. The board agreed that DPW should improve its procedures to ensure that residents receive accurate information about their eligibility for fee deferrals and waivers.

In light of the ongoing confusion, the board decided to continue the hearing for one week, allowing the appellant to work directly with DPW to explore potential resolutions. Supervisors expressed hope that this approach would lead to a satisfactory outcome for the appellant and prevent similar issues from arising in the future.

The meeting underscored the importance of clear communication between city departments and residents, particularly regarding financial obligations that can significantly impact low-income families. The board's commitment to addressing these concerns reflects a growing awareness of the challenges faced by tenants in San Francisco's competitive housing market.