[{"_1":2,"_111":-5,"_112":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87,99],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6599366,"mediaKeyId","3006297-0ed632ffa5e0ea073b3e2df45ee3d67d","parentId",3006297,"title","Public health leaders say San Francisco has flattened the curve but face questions on testing, congregate settings and homeless response","audioSeconds",496,"startMs",5754000,"endMs",6250000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=3006297-0ed632ffa5e0ea073b3e2df45ee3d67d&start=5754&end=6250","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3006297-0ed632ffa5e0ea073b3e2df45ee3d67d/thumbnail_5754000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6599366/San-Francisco-County/California/Public-health-leaders-say-San-Francisco-has-flattened-the-curve-but-face-questions-on-testing-congregate-settings-and-homeless-response","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6599366-b9e29fef16ef40b2de5030c264c477ae/orig.mp4?Expires=1775685624&Signature=ASuqw-HEEblMy7JvynKxSyDBCdTkeOmx~jaVQXItlBVeFB~BCVsJI3Edc03rMlfSZzeAxFDN7l83PeWcf~rK3Uq0dwxJR8Yb6WhmOnTpJKdTP6gsBbYqzx0QpwvwhIeWumr9ZnR81~ZP-61w-OPd24gXXbdgvWmgFaU97Gbq8hYZCYDR8sqySKQm6c7EvvvwiovoJKNueMvgqNksbiiAYHIkIx4E5hxsaIwLkFrpMjsr7LuoThPwx7M2T~7AXSqysoHhnZG8UYnxR-rjSJlM9DNbAzJstV48euGt9ZUdRZirAcx~qL13OeF7LjTKRblSFE3qeVdCOPwsL9efKcLuRg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Sanfrancisco Government tv","date","2025-04-16T04:22:00Z","article","San Francisco Department of Public Health leadership told the Board of Supervisors on May 12 that the city’s early pandemic actions have driven the estimated transmission rate for COVID‑19 below 1 and that local hospitalizations have remained steady. Supervisors used the briefing to press for concrete plans addressing testing, nursing homes and people living outdoors.

Dr. Grant Colfax, director of the Department of Public Health, and Dr. Tom Aragon, the city’s public health officer, said the city’s “shelter‑in‑place” and subsequent directives helped “flatten the curve.” Colfax noted the city’s mortality rate was materially lower than some other large U.S. cities and emphasized the need to “follow the science” as the city considers incremental reopening.

Health staff presented indicators they will monitor going forward: hospitalization and ICU use, testing volumes and percent positive results, contact‑tracing capacity targets and personal protective equipment (PPE) inventories. Dr. Aragon and modeling partners explained that even limited increases in movement can push the estimated reproductive number (R) above 1, which would allow cases to grow again.

Supervisors asked detailed follow‑up questions. They pressed for clarity on testing availability for asymptomatic people in high‑prevalence neighborhoods, regular testing protocols for long‑term‑care facilities and the homeless population, and the legal and operational options for using hotels or other sites for isolation and shelter. Dr. Aragon said the department is prioritizing clinical and congregate settings (for example, long‑term‑care facilities) and is scaling mobile testing teams, but acknowledged capacity, supply chains and operational logistics limit how quickly universal testing can be implemented.

On long‑term‑care facilities, DPH said it is prioritizing Laguna Honda and the Jewish Home and is implementing repeated testing of residents and staff; the department described a plan to test congregate settings on a roughly two‑to‑four‑week cadence as resources permit.

Supervisor Ronan and others pressed Dr. Aragon to issue a public‑health order requiring shelter or other interventions for people living outdoors; Dr. Aragon said he and City Hall staff conferred with the city attorney’s office about the legal framework and the department is coordinating with human services, but he declined to issue an immediate unilateral order at the hearing and said the city was pursuing hotels and other placements for people with medical vulnerability.

Supervisors and speakers said they remain concerned about the pace of testing in lower‑income neighborhoods and in congregate living situations and asked DPH to return with a detailed operational plan and timeline.

Ending: DPH committed to continuing to scale testing, contact tracing and protective equipment inventories and to return to the board with additional details on testing roll‑out and congregate‑facility strategies.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Sanfrancisco Government tv - 158926680005/12/20 - Apr 16, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","San Francisco’s health director and health officer briefed supervisors on May 12, saying the city’s COVID‑19 measures have reduced transmission; supervisors pressed officials for clearer plans and testing capacity for congregate settings and people experiencing homelessness.","taxTitle","San Francisco County, California","taxId",2862,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6599372,"Supervisors accept introduction of 'Vote 16' charter amendment to let 16‑ and 17‑year‑olds vote in city elections",3642,3608000,7250000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3006297-0ed632ffa5e0ea073b3e2df45ee3d67d&start=3608&end=7250","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3006297-0ed632ffa5e0ea073b3e2df45ee3d67d/thumbnail_3608000.jpg","/articles/6599372/San-Francisco-County/California/Supervisors-accept-introduction-of-Vote-16-charter-amendment-to-let-16-and-17yearolds-vote-in-city-elections","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6599372-0bd1c781d6164a164782ebd65a5d63ea/orig.mp4?Expires=1775685624&Signature=JQK5HkFCREC-3gyCI1pQkZJkyX0-mA64xyEXU2X7Cq7sj4LEV-MFtZF6495oqhomgRVbP48C2bS0MuZf-UPKZOBIO6Ge0KayKlo7or8LJHYrOCdAOHsWSpx5aOqAXwDxptiJUV4cgl1ZVadUT-0gTKGTP-m-PuCJ7JiujOlmIHOLXADXks1Kw95O2GJUJAEoTNPqajdTOEBE0ubjxlmEaI7Lq7XwoTW4CiX5sgo0Wq-iNU08W7NT3yq6Zt~ynT-3vg5yNRpTyi8XB2U00Pr2DlI2TyPq-TstLL4JnvXv3Y-1QhN66JdE~8LmZY8Uu5F1g5YgVT87DjLZZnN-sDrHmg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","President Yee introduced a charter amendment on May 12 to place a measure on the November ballot that would allow 16‑ and 17‑year‑olds to vote in San Francisco municipal elections if approved by the voters. The introduction drew support from board members and youth commissioners who organized a youth‑led press event earlier the same day.

Yee said the effort was led by the San Francisco Youth Commission and youth advocates who have previously advanced a similar ballot question in 2016. He said the city’s youth “build the habit of voting” if enfranchised and cited studies and international comparisons showing younger voting ages can lift turnout among young voters.

Kylie Hochman, director of the San Francisco Youth Commission, and youth commissioners including Ariana Nasari spoke in support during public comment and at an earlier press event. Hochman told the board the commission and more than two dozen community organizations support the measure and are prepared to assist with implementation if voters approve it.

Several supervisors said they supported the concept and planned to cosponsor the measure. Supervisor Feuer said she had long supported early civic engagement programs and earlier efforts to preregister 16‑ and 17‑year‑olds.

What happens next: Introduction of the charter amendment places the measure on the board’s agenda to proceed through the city’s charter amendment and ballot‑placement processes. If placed on the ballot and approved by voters, the charter language would change city election rules to permit municipal voting at age 16 for city contests.

Why it matters: San Francisco would be among the first large U.S. cities to permit municipal voting at age 16; proponents say the change could increase lifelong turnout by normalizing voting earlier in civic life and give young residents a formal voice in local policy decisions affecting schools, housing and transportation.

Ending: President Yee asked colleagues to join as cosponsors; youth commission leadership said they would continue outreach leading up to the November ballot.","President Yee introduced a charter amendment on behalf of the San Francisco Youth Commission to place a 'Vote 16' measure on the November ballot, allowing 16‑ and 17‑year‑olds to vote in municipal elections if approved by voters.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6599377,"Board approves multiple ordinances and resolutions; rejects SFMTA reappointment in 6–5 vote",649,2042000,2691000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3006297-0ed632ffa5e0ea073b3e2df45ee3d67d&start=2042&end=2691","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3006297-0ed632ffa5e0ea073b3e2df45ee3d67d/thumbnail_2042000.jpg","/articles/6599377/San-Francisco-County/California/Board-approves-multiple-ordinances-and-resolutions-rejects-SFMTA-reappointment-in-65-vote","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6599377-9f614d61ee3b1c55435eaf96d9e83d68/orig.mp4?Expires=1775685624&Signature=kGxxrsw9eqPspRpuTFxZ0SkW4CQ-Sn2c-t8xo9GnQ9SiBKD0FaTxUx6bvXuEwi~g5siR6FRstkV85~~d9aveLFymJK8TkN4Zx3Ph2Sp4pRhnGD6WxsuO25sGGwKeWN8GY-Z5JsiPtow2bUOQ5w~VbyyLOJ4QrqWlbWLbfQnP~s4VwQOv9mbcX~N0M6T8h2kpiiYFrMaAZpoq16FVmvlMXrwSZvf1Lv9CQ6VVWP10icjv63M4g0FYd8g5hRz4AyO4etn7Bg0RcTksA~GTUeyJWVUe82rvYyx5Xc17y3D~QOJHCuPBw07UedS1nn5kF9xCm~jFxy1SCjk4Pwwp-Tvbpg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The San Francisco Board of Supervisors on May 12 adopted a series of ordinances and resolutions and rejected a mayoral nomination to the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) board.

Key outcomes at a glance

- Mission Rock special tax (item 1): Ordinance levying special taxes for Special Tax District 2020‑1 (Mission Rock facilities and services) — adopted unanimously (11‑0).
- Closure of County Jail No. 4 (item 2): Ordinance to require closure of the seventh‑floor jail in the Hall of Justice by Nov. 1, 2020 and to create a Sentencing Commission subcommittee — adopted 10 ayes, 1 no (Supervisor Stephanie recorded the lone no).
- Planning code: intermediate‑length occupancy (item 3): Ordinance to create an intermediate‑length occupancy residential use classification — first reading approved unanimously (11‑0).
- SFMTA board nomination (item 4): Motion to confirm the mayor’s reappointment of Christina Rukki (transcript spelling variant) to the SFMTA board — confirmation motion defeated 6 no, 5 yes. Roll call recorded ayes from Supervisors Yi, Mandelmann, Mar, Safaie, and Stephanie; nos from Supervisors Feuer, Haney, Peskin, Preston and Ronan, and Walton.
- Military pay supplementation for COVID‑19 activation (item 5): Ordinance to allow salary supplementation for city employees called to active duty for COVID‑19 response — adopted unanimously (11‑0).
- Real property lease actions (items 6 and 7): Resolutions authorizing lease amendments and an extension for city office/service space — adopted unanimously (11‑0).
- Treasure Island HCD award (item 8): Resolution authorizing the Treasure Island Development Authority to accept HCD awards and related grant — adopted unanimously (11‑0).
- Planning demolition conditional use (item 9): Ordinance to require conditional use authorization when demolition of a single‑family home would remove demonstrably not-affordable housing — passed first reading unanimously (11‑0).
- Balboa Reservoir Community Advisory Committee extension (item 10): Ordinance extending the CAC sunset date to July 1, 2021 — passed unanimously (11‑0).
- Resolution opposing AB 2261 (item 13): Board adopted a resolution opposing a state assembly bill that would preempt the city’s restriction on government use of facial recognition — adopted 10‑1 (Supervisor Stephanie recorded the lone no).
- COVID‑19 data tracker additions (item 16): Resolution urging inclusion of sexual‑orientation and gender‑identity data and expanded congregate‑facility reporting — adopted unanimously (11‑0).
- Commendation (item 18): Resolution commending Capt. Brett Crozier, USN — adopted unanimously (11‑0).
- A set of other committee-reported items (items 14, 15, 17, 19 and 20) were adopted without objection (roll calls recorded as unanimous where required).

Why the nomination failed: Several supervisors said they objected to the nominee’s record on SFMTA votes and commission responsiveness to board resolutions and public comment. Three supervisors spoke during the confirmation debate arguing the board should send a message about commission accountability; other supervisors expressed respect for the nominee’s service but voted no for political or representational reasons.

Board procedure and next steps: Several items were adopted on first reading; others (ordinances) will return for subsequent readings as required by the administrative code. Where resolutions require departmental follow up or implementation, the board asked staff to file the items and to return with implementation details where relevant.

Documents and motions: The board’s official minutes and individual ordinance/resolution text, including each roll call, are available through the board clerk’s online record for May 12, 2020.

Ending: The board moved quickly through several consent and committee items after public comment and a special mayoral appearance; bonds, leases, planning code changes and several policy resolutions were among the measures adopted before the board adjourned to a scheduled briefing on COVID‑19 health updates.","At its May 12 meeting the San Francisco Board of Supervisors adopted a package of ordinances and resolutions including Mission Rock special tax and closures and passed a resolution opposing a state bill on facial recognition; the board declined to confirm a mayoral appointee to the SFMTA board by a 6–5 margin.",{"_33":100,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":101,"_41":102,"_43":103,"_45":104,"_47":105,"_49":106,"_51":107,"_53":108,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":109,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":110,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6599379,"Mayor Breed asks San Francisco supervisors to start work on recovery bond centered on mental health, parks and basic infrastructure",317,358000,675000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3006297-0ed632ffa5e0ea073b3e2df45ee3d67d&start=358&end=675","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3006297-0ed632ffa5e0ea073b3e2df45ee3d67d/thumbnail_358000.jpg","/articles/6599379/San-Francisco-County/California/Mayor-Breed-asks-San-Francisco-supervisors-to-start-work-on-recovery-bond-centered-on-mental-health-parks-and-basic-infrastructure","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6599379-5258363cf22aa3d92a6ea8ff44ab3a2d/orig.mp4?Expires=1775685624&Signature=jMLXwLnSLgYGMhC3XSCJG36~V9pXHeu14HV~UZsVowFIwFK~2HuX07bSDtQepHM8-WxwtxGBgE1pe5KWYTemz-ZjXu5za0XXfMrbe0qvUVEBq0kh-YcWEMcw3vhpzkqJG9yk~VWw5g1662Ti-jskqGjz2O5XUcROsrxU4uU1HDEtmRQ1Q8viUweydSPnlhU077FZxGygYClxp5TxBcB~LwvZn3OpNwTpUjEY4JkEbB82sY3TlmUC7PYpJJV-hNakJ8fl684BC9LIh51SWgXB6vNRIdNKOvgqCLNHa3wDxxNwOzddb68H5EUczO38tU4-O2lneX8f6XTg5GBIxnrFAA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Mayor London Breed told the San Francisco Board of Supervisors on May 12 that she is introducing legislation to begin work on a recovery bond measure for the November ballot that would prioritize mental-health facilities, neighborhood parks and basic infrastructure repairs.

The mayor said the proposal would fund “building, purchasing, and the mental health facilities that our city and our most vulnerable so desperately need,” and carve out capacity for parks projects and capital items such as repaving, bike lanes and curb ramps that she described as “not flashy, but they keep our city working.”

Breed framed the bond as a response both to long‑running problems — behavioral health, homelessness and capital needs — and an immediate pandemic-driven economic contraction. “We have a month to roll up our sleeves, speak with our constituents, and weigh the competing priorities of our city,” she said, adding that she wants supervisors’ feedback as staff drafts details.

The mayor said the bond would prioritize park projects in neighborhoods that have experienced “decades of disinvestment,” arguing those sites could both serve communities of color and create near-term construction jobs. She also said the bond “carved out some bond capacity for basic infrastructure” including repaving and accessibility work.

Several supervisors and the board president thanked the mayor and said they expected further discussion. President Yee said the board and the mayor were working toward “a more coequal collaboration” on emergency policy and communications.

What happens next: Breed said she will circulate a draft and invited supervisors to propose additions and changes over the coming weeks. She described the measure as one of several “hard choices” the city will face entering a recession, and said the city has “soaked up all the extra debt capacity” from earlier bond plans, so choices must be prioritized.

Why it matters: The proposal links traditional capital spending to behavioral‑health investments — signaling the mayor’s intention to use general‑obligation borrowing to pay for both services and short‑term job creation in a budget environment the administration says will be strained by pandemic-related revenue losses.

Board reaction: Supervisors said they appreciated the mayor’s outreach and asked for more time and details. Several supervisors told the board they wanted stronger emphasis on mental‑health capacity; Breed responded she was listening and expected the bond to change as supervisors and community advocates weigh in.

The mayor’s office and board staff did not finalize a text at the hearing; supervisors and the mayor said they planned a month of outreach and drafting before finalizing a ballot measure for the November election.

Ending note: Breed said the recovery bond “is going to be our first effort of what will be several hard choices in a very, very tough economy,” and asked colleagues to continue providing input as staff composes the measure.","Mayor London Breed asked the Board of Supervisors on May 12 to begin work on a November recovery bond that would finance mental-health facilities, jobs-building park projects in disinvested neighborhoods and basic street and accessibility repairs.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Public health leaders say San Francisco has flattened the curve but face questions on testing, congregate settings and homeless response

Supervisors accept introduction of 'Vote 16' charter amendment to let 16‑ and 17‑year‑olds vote in city elections

Board approves multiple ordinances and resolutions; rejects SFMTA reappointment in 6–5 vote

Mayor Breed asks San Francisco supervisors to start work on recovery bond centered on mental health, parks and basic infrastructure