The Berea City Council meeting on April 7, 2025, featured a significant discussion regarding the city's current chicken ownership ordinance. A resident, Mike from Walnut Drive, addressed the council, expressing concerns about the restrictions on the number of chickens residents can own. He highlighted that the existing ordinance, which has been in place for about ten years, may not adequately reflect the community's needs or historical practices regarding poultry ownership.
Mike pointed out that there have been no restrictions on chicken ownership in Berea for over 165 years, suggesting that the current limitations stem from past complaints about irresponsible ownership rather than a widespread issue. He urged the council to consider a more balanced approach, arguing that the actions of a few should not dictate regulations for all residents.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free In response, a council member provided details about the ordinance, explaining that it allows for different numbers of chickens based on property size: eight chickens for properties under 10,000 square feet, twelve for those between 10,000 square feet and one acre, and twenty-four for properties larger than one acre. The council member noted that these numbers were established after discussions in 2016, aimed at providing a gradual transition for residents to adjust to the new regulations.
The council member also recounted the history of the ordinance's introduction, which was prompted by community concerns about chickens running at large and the presence of roosters. This led to a community engagement effort, including a "chicken tour" organized by residents, which helped council members understand the local perspective on chicken ownership.
The discussion reflects ongoing community engagement and the council's willingness to revisit regulations based on resident feedback. The council did not make any immediate decisions regarding changes to the ordinance during this meeting, but the dialogue indicates a potential for future revisions as they consider the concerns raised by residents.