Connecticut enacts bill clarifying wildlife permit regulations and deadly force against bears

The Connecticut State Legislature has introduced Substitute Bill No. 1523, aimed at addressing wildlife management and public safety concerns related to bear encounters. The bill, presented on April 16, 2025, seeks to streamline the process for property owners and lessees to obtain permits for taking wildlife that causes excessive damage to their property.

Key provisions of the bill include allowing permits to be issued without notarization, simplifying the process for property owners, their agents, or lessees with written permission from the owner. Additionally, the bill clarifies that any wildlife taken must be disposed of according to directives from the state’s Department of Energy and Environmental Protection. Importantly, the bill explicitly prohibits the taking of federally protected species.

Another significant aspect of the bill is the amendment to existing laws regarding the use of deadly force against bears. Under the new provisions, individuals may use deadly force if they reasonably believe a bear poses an imminent threat to human safety, pets, or livestock, or if the bear enters an occupied building.

The introduction of this bill has sparked discussions among lawmakers and wildlife advocates. Supporters argue that it provides necessary protections for residents living in areas with increasing bear populations, while opponents express concerns about potential misuse of the provisions and the impact on bear conservation efforts.

The implications of Senate Bill 1523 are noteworthy, as they reflect ongoing tensions between wildlife management and public safety. Experts suggest that while the bill may offer immediate relief to property owners, it could also lead to increased bear fatalities if not monitored carefully. The bill's passage could set a precedent for how Connecticut manages human-wildlife interactions in the future.

As the legislative process unfolds, stakeholders will be watching closely to see how the bill is debated, amended, and ultimately enacted, with potential long-term effects on both wildlife populations and community safety in Connecticut.