On April 16, 2025, the Bay County Code Magistrate Hearing addressed ongoing compliance issues involving local resident Mr. Wesson, who has faced significant daily fines related to expired permits. The hearing highlighted the complexities of code enforcement and the challenges residents face in adhering to local regulations.
Mr. Wesson's case has been ongoing since May 2024, during which he accrued fines totaling approximately $2,100 due to non-compliance with permit requirements. His roofing permit, obtained in September 2024, expired in April 2025, coinciding with the date he hired legal counsel. This timing raised concerns among officials regarding his commitment to resolving the issues at hand.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free During the hearing, Mr. Wesson's attorney argued for leniency, citing his client's good faith efforts to address the problems, including a recent consultation with legal representatives. However, the magistrate expressed skepticism about these claims, noting Mr. Wesson's history of failing to follow through on compliance measures, including a previous attempt to appeal that did not materialize.
The magistrate emphasized that Mr. Wesson had been aware of the compliance hearing since February but failed to make arrangements to attend, further complicating his case. The lack of action on his part, despite being informed of the consequences, raised questions about his commitment to resolving the outstanding issues.
As the hearing concluded, the magistrate underscored the importance of compliance with local codes and the implications of repeated non-compliance for residents. The case serves as a reminder of the responsibilities that come with property ownership and the potential repercussions of neglecting those duties. The magistrate's decision on the matter is anticipated, with implications for Mr. Wesson's future compliance and financial liabilities.