Jackson County officials are advocating for reforms to urban renewal practices following a recent House Committee on Rules meeting. The discussions highlighted concerns over how urban renewal districts divert essential funding from counties and other taxing districts, impacting vital public services such as jail operations, mental health crisis services, and animal control.
During the meeting, Jackson County representative Mr. Benton emphasized that urban renewal has become a significant burden, with over 15% of the county's fixed tax rate being redirected to these districts. This diversion of funds limits the county's ability to maintain necessary services for its residents, particularly in incorporated cities.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free Tracy Hensley, city council president of Canby, echoed these sentiments, noting that while urban renewal can spur economic development, it can also lead to unintended consequences. Hensley pointed out that tax increment financing is sometimes used for projects that do not generate new tax revenue, further straining public resources. She stressed the need for transparency and community involvement, suggesting that voters should have the opportunity to review and approve urban renewal plans with full knowledge of their potential impacts.
Both speakers agreed that while the current House bill is a positive step, it should serve as a catalyst for broader discussions on urban renewal reform. They called for a collaborative approach to ensure that urban renewal serves the community's best interests without compromising essential services.
As the conversation around urban renewal continues, local leaders are hopeful that these discussions will lead to meaningful changes that balance economic development with the needs of public services. The committee's willingness to engage in this dialogue signals a potential shift towards more responsible urban renewal practices in Oregon.