Oregon legislators oppose House Bill 3054 citing risks to affordable housing market

The Oregon State Legislature convened on April 16, 2025, to discuss critical housing legislation, particularly House Bill 3054, which aims to impose stricter rent control measures on manufactured home parks. The meeting highlighted a growing divide among lawmakers regarding the best approach to address the state's ongoing housing crisis.

A significant portion of the discussion centered around the implications of the proposed rent cap, which would limit increases to 6%. Critics, including several representatives, argued that such measures could deter investment in housing and exacerbate the very issues they aim to resolve. They emphasized that while predictability in rent may seem beneficial, the ultimate goal for housing providers is profitability, which is essential for maintaining and developing affordable housing options.

One representative presented a stack of letters from constituents opposing the bill, underscoring a lack of public input during the legislative process. They argued that the bill would not effectively increase affordable housing but instead create instability for housing providers, who may be forced to sell their properties for redevelopment, leading to evictions and further housing shortages.

Another lawmaker pointed out that the state itself had authorized rent increases exceeding the proposed cap, suggesting a disconnect between legislative intentions and practical realities. They warned that imposing such restrictions could lead to unintended consequences, including higher rents as property owners adjust to maintain their financial viability.

Supporters of the bill, however, maintained that it is a necessary step to protect low-income residents in manufactured home parks, many of whom are seniors on fixed incomes. They argued that the state must take action to ensure housing remains accessible to vulnerable populations.

As the debate unfolded, it became clear that lawmakers are grappling with the complexities of Oregon's housing crisis. While some advocate for stricter regulations to protect tenants, others caution that such measures could stifle investment and ultimately harm the very individuals they intend to help.

The meeting concluded with calls for further discussion and consideration of alternative solutions, such as targeted subsidies for property owners who keep rents low, rather than broad regulatory measures that may hinder the housing market. As the legislature continues to navigate these challenges, the outcome of House Bill 3054 remains uncertain, with significant implications for both tenants and housing providers across the state.