[{"_1":2,"_124":-5,"_125":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,76,88,100,112],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},"mediaId",6072405,"mediaKeyId","3026338-cfa31da93508b4600bbea47cb9858dcf","parentId",3026338,"title","Votes at a glance: multiple bills cleared by the Arizona Senate on April 14","audioSeconds",3236,"startMs",509000,"endMs",3745000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=3026338-cfa31da93508b4600bbea47cb9858dcf&start=509&end=3745","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3026338-cfa31da93508b4600bbea47cb9858dcf/thumbnail_509000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6072405/Arizona/Votes-at-a-glance-multiple-bills-cleared-by-the-Arizona-Senate-on-April-14","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6072405-d9f8e18c6ddf9217c0e43b3c866efd97/orig.mp4?Expires=1771041984&Signature=VPpjIkYxMXEifebTz9HZM0g3e3D60JaPYdJ1~8R-uxkNnurfKpf-Ps-BhB14yMzyIeIk42Gxxha-eDZpuoVIXaHHProhhWZ0yZew2Kt-N0aJOne5HIp6GOsvZt-UClC9H~Q1jUoeHAUCaY8XC4oALfqHp1z-0-IxGUq6m3HEizcmk92sGFwalHbpX4Lmy5bEyP0CqWnevkvzalOhA5K5gDBb7SPUlmSRo6FI5jYXf74HfoHEin41QZU~3C54qcFBWHGxH92gskcm62lyU7pE8kOAeRhiaNwlkSygsteOWnUysLoj761IYBqrFwMlxVxevcPUBUxeL66QHVB8ylH52A__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Arizona Legislature","date","2025-04-15T00:00:00Z","article","The Arizona Senate recorded final passage and transmittal to the governor or House for the following bills on April 14. Several measures were read on final passage with no extended floor debate and were recorded by the secretary or clerk.

- SB 10-27 — Passed (recorded tally in transcript: 17 ayes, 13 nays). Transmitted to the governor.

- SB 10-35 — Passed (recorded tally: 27 ayes, 3 nays). Transmitted to the governor.

- SB 10-71 — Passed (recorded tally: 17 ayes, 13 nays). Transmitted to the governor.

- SB 12-19 — Passed (aye votes recorded on floor; clerk recorded passage and transmission to governor).

- SB 13-09 — Passed (clerk recorded passage and transmission to the governor).

- SB 13-33 — Passed (recorded by secretary: 29 ayes, 1 nay). Transmitted to the House.

- SB 14-61 — Passed (recorded tally: 18 ayes, 12 nays). Transmitted to the governor.

- SB 14-94 — Passed (recorded tally: 27 ayes, 3 nays). Transmitted to the governor.

- SB 15-01 — Passed (recorded tally: 18 ayes, 12 nays). Transmitted to the governor.

- SB 15-51 — Passed (recorded tally: 29 ayes, 1 nay). Transmitted to the governor.

- SB 10-43 (listed earlier as part of group concurrence) — Group motion concurred in House amendments as recorded on the floor.

- House Bill 2,032 — Passed on third reading by voice roll (clerk recorded 30 ayes, 0 nays). Transmitted to the House.

- House Bill 21-69 — Passed (floor recorded passage and transmission to the House).

- House Bill 22-57 — Passed (floor recorded passage; tally recorded and transmitted to the House).

- House Bill 23-75 — Passed (clerk recorded passage and transmission to the House).

- House Bill 24-38 — Passed (recorded tally: 17 ayes, 13 nays). Returned to the House.

- House Bill 24-48 — Passed (recorded tally: 17 ayes, 13 nays). Transmitted to the House.

- House Bill 24-51 — Passed (recorded tally: 24 ayes, 6 nays). Transmitted to the House.

These entries reflect the clerk and secretary announcements on the Senate floor. The transcript records final readings, roll calls and, in many cases, brief \"explanation of vote\" remarks. For bills where an explicit tally was read into the record, that tally is shown above; where the floor transcript recorded passage without a numeric tally that item is listed as \"passed\" and marked as transmitted to the next step in the process.

Because many measures were handled by group motion or final-reading roll calls, readers interested in the full roll-call records should consult the official Senate journal or the secretary of the Senate for the certified tallies and enrolled versions.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","04/15/2025 - Senate Floor Session","oneSentenceSummary","On April 14 the Arizona Senate passed a package of bills on final reading; several passed with little floor debate. This roundup lists each bill recorded on the Senate floor, its outcome and the clerk-recorded tally when given in the transcript.","taxTitle","2025 Legislature Arizona, Arizona","taxId",78572,"location","Arizona","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":77,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":78,"_41":79,"_43":80,"_45":81,"_47":82,"_49":83,"_51":84,"_53":85,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":86,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":87,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6072410,"Senate approves bill limiting DCS placement rules for vaccinated households after safety debate",126,5619000,5745000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3026338-cfa31da93508b4600bbea47cb9858dcf&start=5619&end=5745","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3026338-cfa31da93508b4600bbea47cb9858dcf/thumbnail_5619000.jpg","/articles/6072410/Arizona/Senate-approves-bill-limiting-DCS-placement-rules-for-vaccinated-households-after-safety-debate","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6072410-cdd6ab63b55619709a1987704546f7b1/orig.mp4?Expires=1771041984&Signature=epQSTwRmdXDyExzpiKIKHJ3KhJpXHD78IFuhALD2iPf1jfeQcY87uWFsIAaWhqviakJ0iNdExdHundteUWQSlirEdpyl9oJttP2YRErV49EyZCksQq2QNpONilahoRuBZb8yATOI9QrqHmxecwZf9mSXjAA4NGPk5xJgfB8cYj6AhqLbpaHu5MF9dyV4w5ApKjMBsDYHcpIAOaXoOsr9GYsd48GTP6OVzBL5RxyqLmOjGFLiOMfhfzEK9hz8Jp3pYTUPeXQOz3OA3NIIjfb~F~yPUG1VLRVn7hEW1Vps~kUh424Rdjs4xNAVE5IZ38vPDKqhkv8vofxhV9LCYSS4lg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Senate voted to pass House Bill 22-57 on April 14; the measure changes Department of Child Safety (DCS) placement rules related to vaccination status for households taking foster children. Lawmakers debated child-safety, medical risk, and placement logistics before the clerk closed the roll call.

Senator Kubey argued against the bill on public-health grounds. \"This bill, should it be enacted, ... would be a danger for babies and toddlers from 0 to 5,\" Kubey said on the floor, noting current DCS policy and concerns from pediatricians and the American Academy of Pediatrics. She added that at present, no child ages 0–5 in DCS care is unable to be placed in a fully vaccinated home.

Senator Gonzalez also voted no, warning that medically vulnerable children could be exposed to vaccine-preventable diseases and invoked recent measles outbreaks as context. Supporters of the bill argued it preserves family choice in caregiving placements.

The clerk recorded the roll and the bill passed by the recorded vote indicated on the Senate floor; the secretary was instructed to transmit the measure to the House. Floor debate included references to statements from medical organizations and questions about potential legal and fiscal consequences; no floor amendments were recorded on the transcript.","The Senate passed House Bill 22-57 on April 14 after debate about child-safety and foster placement policy. Opponents warned the bill could increase risk to infants and toddlers; supporters said it protects parental choice. The measure passed and was transmitted to the House.",{"_33":89,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":90,"_41":91,"_43":92,"_45":93,"_47":94,"_49":95,"_51":96,"_53":97,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":98,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":99,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6072415,"Senate passes bill restricting changes to birth-certificate gender markers after heated debate",426,6267000,6693000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3026338-cfa31da93508b4600bbea47cb9858dcf&start=6267&end=6693","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3026338-cfa31da93508b4600bbea47cb9858dcf/thumbnail_6267000.jpg","/articles/6072415/Arizona/Senate-passes-bill-restricting-changes-to-birth-certificate-gender-markers-after-heated-debate","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6072415-072ba1d1885e419b9a5f89843ab6a4b6/orig.mp4?Expires=1771041984&Signature=Uw02~PVniSOM-t84g4jMX-O45KZ5a3KVnztpXtaKYo5ik8XvkUrBM-xWDXza3K7iqWchNRHpwm-3l-ABtWuk1yEFQZzPFs3cjV7HNr6rFpGooUO0g6s5RyQqQun255w9CL-eZqe61b~nLSq3MN1CwprCpwZrL59FG7eBFz95v4auzjHbYVAYEd0zAV26Usjnvy9CtRyHKBYyIEcGfF8OmaC6bSW5HGSjBMqfH5l5bE0L2EbESDpcIME1WYfEmQCiQRa8E5F5cfLd21ykKYtOm4s~lGqg7rGPg-UQlPPhGd514ooajA0rEKmoSFLoMjBA8vR-snAv-DS7XcLq-pP7jQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Senate debated and passed House Bill 24-38 on April 14; the measure restricts methods for changing the gender marker and certain name changes on Arizona birth certificates. The clerk recorded the final passage and the bill was transmitted to the House.

Opponents described the bill as harmful to transgender and intersex Arizonans and argued it would force people to carry documentation that does not match their lived identity. Senator Gobaldon (floor name appears as \"Gobaldon\") said the bill \"undermines the rights and dignity of transgender and intersex individuals\" and added that restricting amendments to birth certificates would increase risk of discrimination and privacy harms.

Supporters framed the measure as preserving historical accuracy of birth records. Senator Kavanaugh said, \"It's called the birth certificate, not an ongoing life certificate. You can't change history. I vote yes.\" Other senators expressed moral and constitutional arguments on both sides; several said they had constituents who felt strongly.

Senators described the legal context and recent litigation in federal court. Senator Cubpey noted a recent U.S. District Court decision (Roe v. Canucko mentioned on the floor) that had found restrictions on amending birth-certificate gender markers problematic; opponents argued the bill would invite litigation. Supporters said the policy protected record integrity.

The roll call concluded with the secretary recording the vote and instructions to transmit the bill. Floor debate included extended personal remarks and constitutional framing; no amendments were recorded on the floor transcript.","House Bill 24-38, which limits changes to gender markers and name changes on birth certificates, passed the Senate after intense floor debate that split lawmakers along civil-rights and privacy lines; final passage recorded 17-13 and the measure will be transmitted to the House for enrollment.",{"_33":101,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":102,"_41":103,"_43":104,"_45":105,"_47":106,"_49":107,"_51":108,"_53":109,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":110,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":111,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6072420,"Senate passes bill shielding certain corporate headquarters from referendum after heated debate, 17-13",2226,1517000,3743000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3026338-cfa31da93508b4600bbea47cb9858dcf&start=1517&end=3743","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3026338-cfa31da93508b4600bbea47cb9858dcf/thumbnail_1517000.jpg","/articles/6072420/Arizona/Senate-passes-bill-shielding-certain-corporate-headquarters-from-referendum-after-heated-debate-17-13","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6072420-90463f1be28568957ee165dfb13a7e5c/orig.mp4?Expires=1771041984&Signature=lLSsTz3EdrzCRwhdN08Jo7EMxZEEyEDLbIjjr9FMcu~DSE2oyR4PyMvuz3gjzVulpYXysQsaenegDBbqnOBdpHryuzfNNZKM3CV~QFtJMNJhD2-ndRVxLqF4CgTzbeuw2OKZYD5IN92gZn9AJpL0GLgyVkQLkmLGrnapTzfEwK5fPlbo9Vo1S~fik46Hu9VhStp2ZRPNjSy0B9orY-lyhKgK-~j5weSKJIyP7Jq~7Tjwxeh3F1zCfzR5~ZaLLcOa9~K39G-XAAgWYD~UFwJC8TFxE-GqLFtjmli~oa~YR2Q2ed1hrGyRw4ZNZSi1E6I3CXeIeiQetmU51-9yKnrpRQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Arizona Senate voted 17-13 on April 14 to pass SB 15-43, a measure supporters described as a tool to secure a company headquarters and associated economic development in select cities; opponents argued the bill amounts to special legislation that strips voters’ rights to refer local rezoning decisions.

Senator Kavanaugh, speaking against the bill, described an active, certified petition and a scheduled election in Scottsdale and said the legislation would cancel that election. \"An election has actually been called and has actually been scheduled. A vote for this bill will cancel that election. That's not theoretical. That's actual. So this is voter suppression on steroids,\" he said.

Sponsors and other supporters said the bill would protect and grow high-paying jobs. \"Axon is one of Arizona's most innovative, impactful companies... Having Axon headquartered in Arizona means more than just good jobs,\" Senator Fernandez said in a floor explanation, urging an aye vote to keep the company in state and to grow technology-sector employment.

Other senators framed the vote around housing and local economic development. Senator Carroll described how the measure could help cities such as Glendale and Peoria secure jobs and housing, while Senator Epstein criticized the bill’s housing provisions as inadequate and emphasized the constitutional issue of special legislation and the right of residents to be heard.

Senator Leach warned of the risk of losing the company to other states: \"If Axon were to leave... we're getting feedback from companies that are looking at Arizona that, 'oh, no, wait a minute, they might run a referendum...' That's frustrating. That's frustrating the growth.\" Supporters noted proposed job counts and payroll figures, with on-the-floor comments citing thousands of current and prospective positions.

Opponents repeatedly raised the legal question of whether the bill constitutes special legislation and referred to prior court decisions about administrative versus legislative acts; Senator Carroll referenced Winter Storm v. City of Mesa to explain the legal complexity and the risk of litigation. Several senators also argued that the bill applied narrowly to \"international\" company headquarters and only to cities within a defined population range, a point critics said made the legislation appear tailored.

After extensive floor explanations, the clerk recorded the vote as 17 ayes and 13 nays; the measure was signed in open session and the secretary instructed to transmit the bill to the governor.","SB 15-43, a bill supporters said would keep the company Axon and create jobs while opponents called it special legislation and voter suppression, passed the Arizona Senate 17-13 after extended floor debate over democracy, housing and economic development.",{"_33":113,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":114,"_41":115,"_43":116,"_45":117,"_47":118,"_49":119,"_51":120,"_53":121,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":122,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":123,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6072424,"Senate approves law targeting false military service claims, 29-1",786,709000,1495000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3026338-cfa31da93508b4600bbea47cb9858dcf&start=709&end=1495","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3026338-cfa31da93508b4600bbea47cb9858dcf/thumbnail_709000.jpg","/articles/6072424/Arizona/Senate-approves-law-targeting-false-military-service-claims-29-1","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6072424-947aad16a6df7c13435d64b6283fbb41/orig.mp4?Expires=1771041984&Signature=QuH2hCtxuLNL~mpHf3kysFO1Esg~DPuqY7DYuyPY42KoUkcnj6l2IOa2nUe48e8ZZ9WCKjDX5tsShWbxatLCqDg-5E8Z4UNbMPZLG0kHcIxVGsvYH6SYV9ai~3IOCVX3L7gTxW9cIb1KB3qzAzqSY2Ai1nfccebeurPLdOIeUZ0tm0xalmDFjPuEjpGzjnp-ZIO2XwY86cIOw6CSd29JpbzY4supwOHDJobr4vjmM8lJW2NKPul~DHxwC73aulEuonxEQEv07AzvJ1BZ1hmarzxXX7btyY7Qgu~DQ4UgOO1sBI~E1asHiuZAJt5E9nnIZOkOe7y6SwjC6SwPTM0lYg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Senators passed Senate Bill 14-24 on April 14, sending to the governor a measure that tightens penalties for people who falsely claim military service or honors. The Senate approved the bill by a recorded vote of 29-1.

The bill’s sponsor and backers framed the measure as protection for veterans’ service and reputation. \"This legislation is designed to protect the honor of Arizona's veterans by cracking down on individuals who falsely claim military service or honors for personal gain,\" said Senator Bullock during floor remarks explaining his aye vote.

Supporters described the bill as bipartisan and part of a broader effort seen in other states. Senator Epstein, who also spoke in favor, said the bill reflects belief in the rule of law across parties: \"This bill is what that's about. So with great admiration for those who have served... I vote yes.\"

Several senators offered personal explanations for their votes, linking the legislation to family members' service. Senator Topley, identifying relatives who were Navajo code talkers and other veterans, described interactions with veterans and said the bill was an appropriate step to prevent exploitation. Senator Rogers noted bipartisan work on the measure and said it reflects compromise and respect for veterans.

The Senate clerk recorded the final tally as 29 ayes and 1 nay; the measure was placed on the list to be transmitted to the governor.

The floor debate consisted of multiple short explanations of vote from members across the chamber and no amendments were recorded on the floor. The bill now proceeds to the governor’s desk for signature or veto.

For reference, the Senate read the bill on final passage and recorded member explanations before the roll call concluded with the clerk instructing transmission to the governor.","The Arizona Senate on April 14 passed SB 14-24 to criminalize false claims of military service or honors. Backers said the measure protects veterans’ reputations; supporters and several lawmakers described personal ties to veterans. The bill was transmitted to the governor.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Votes at a glance: multiple bills cleared by the Arizona Senate on April 14

Senate approves bill limiting DCS placement rules for vaccinated households after safety debate

Senate passes bill restricting changes to birth-certificate gender markers after heated debate

Senate passes bill shielding certain corporate headquarters from referendum after heated debate, 17-13

Senate approves law targeting false military service claims, 29-1