Montana's House Bill 350 has sparked significant debate as it seeks to prohibit the enforcement of policies from major intergovernmental entities, including the World Health Organization (WHO), the United Nations (UN), and the World Economic Forum (WEF). Introduced on April 16, 2025, this legislation asserts that these organizations hold no jurisdiction within the state, effectively barring local governments from implementing any mandates or requirements issued by them.
The bill's primary aim is to assert state sovereignty over public health and policy decisions, a move that proponents argue is essential for maintaining local control. Supporters claim that it protects Montanans from what they view as overreach by international bodies, particularly in the wake of contentious public health measures during the COVID-19 pandemic. "This bill is about ensuring that our state can make decisions that reflect the values and needs of our communities without outside interference," stated a key supporter during legislative discussions.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free However, the bill has faced considerable opposition. Critics argue that it undermines public health initiatives and could isolate Montana from global cooperation on critical issues such as health crises and climate change. Public health experts warn that rejecting guidance from established international organizations could have dire consequences for the state's ability to respond to future emergencies. "This bill sends a troubling message that Montana is turning its back on collaborative efforts that have proven essential in protecting public health," remarked a public health advocate.
The implications of House Bill 350 extend beyond health policy; it raises questions about the state's relationship with international entities and could set a precedent for similar legislation in other states. As the bill moves forward, its potential impact on public health funding and resources remains a critical concern. With an immediate effective date, the legislation could reshape how Montana engages with global health initiatives, leaving many to wonder about the long-term consequences of such a bold legislative move.