[{"_1":2,"_99":-5,"_100":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6271163,"mediaKeyId","3029414-820c4e7e0f08c4120b1ac3aed138bd08","parentId",3029414,"title","Votes at a glance: Codington County Commission actions April 15 — claims, travel, and executive session","audioSeconds",11,"startMs",2734000,"endMs",2745000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=3029414-820c4e7e0f08c4120b1ac3aed138bd08&start=2734&end=2745","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3029414-820c4e7e0f08c4120b1ac3aed138bd08/thumbnail_2734000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6271163/Codington-County/South-Dakota/Votes-at-a-glance-Codington-County-Commission-actions-April-15-claims-travel-and-executive-session","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6271163-21b0005eb475ba6962dd49d6dc65cbe0/orig.mp4?Expires=1770698325&Signature=fWkk8gsTwnNCgGisdRCmfDnnfqqfy1VvsaXLBu7KLIGU9yBROadBK92QuMFJoxLKLC8-f0RuhHXNeOqf8KauEOx0MnrUrj13WMiOcvzXH~Qd1dZ9u2bDtVCZTRmdHtAXKxk1Rg47~-nJwKnpBA2GyhsGKjMsSa6Ni~zUh4IpK-xmiHKqARQKJf5t4WnGm~wfGNIGzF~ebF0WwIEU6oqALcXPr42Z2kvCMb1e~l9oEIXNjTDx24QdtkSIIfMpOFoo3jY0ZEFe2dnx5s01cu7dOW~ksgAyEUAQ2XgR2CFS8iEZa-kVvgrnV73MY-7buFeHvlPoZfOIz9MC0qhGMn4GPA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Codington County, SD","date","2025-04-17T01:04:03.367Z","article","The Codington County Commission took a series of routine actions on April 15, approving the meeting agenda and minutes, county and project claims, travel requests, and a motion to move into executive session. Below is a concise list of each formal action recorded in the meeting and its outcome.

Votes at a glance

- Approve agenda for April 15: Motion carried by voice vote (mover: Commissioner McElhinney; second: Commissioner Gable).

- Approve minutes for April 8: Motion carried by voice vote (mover: Commissioner Johnson; second: Commissioner McElhinney).

- No abatements: Action taken to approve no abatements (motion carried).

- Approve county claims packet: The claims packet for the current cutoff showed total claims of $30,689.49, of which $2,301.30 was state pass‑through and the county portion totaled $28,388.13. Motion to approve county claims carried (mover: Commissioner McElhinney; second: Commissioner Gable).

- Approve payment to Tigra for new jail project: $21,410.86; motion carried (mover: Commissioner McElhinney; second: Commissioner Gable).

- Approve 911 pass‑through payment to city of Watertown: $37,453.45 (February 2025 payment); motion carried (mover: Commissioner Johnson; second: Commissioner McElhinney).

- Approve travel requests: Several travel requests (community service office staff training; veteran service office travel and training) were approved; motion carried.

- Motion to enter executive session under agenda item 19: Motion carried by voice vote (mover: Commissioner Johnson; second: Commissioner McElhinney).

Each of the actions above was recorded by the clerk during the meeting; commissioners approved the listed motions, generally by voice vote. Several items included staff presentations or numeric detail discussed at the meeting (claims totals and the specific dollar amounts listed above).","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Codington County Commissioners’ Meeting 04152025","oneSentenceSummary","At its April 15 meeting the Codington County Commission approved routine business: agenda and minutes, claims (including a $21,410.86 jail‑project payment), a $37,453.45 911 pass‑through to Watertown, travel requests and authorized an executive session. A list of motions and outcomes follows.","taxTitle","Codington County, South Dakota","taxId",52826,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6271169,"Codington County authorizes notice to bidders for County Road 20 paving project",68,743000,811000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3029414-820c4e7e0f08c4120b1ac3aed138bd08&start=743&end=811","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3029414-820c4e7e0f08c4120b1ac3aed138bd08/thumbnail_743000.jpg","/articles/6271169/Codington-County/South-Dakota/Codington-County-authorizes-notice-to-bidders-for-County-Road-20-paving-project","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6271169-2a957477f0188bd73128a1167993e64b/orig.mp4?Expires=1770698325&Signature=YlWA9KyJzEkGzNDYf2N0fG11AaVQFYeDLMNVolK8GMGSYNP6wXtRAD~BrUx4iggOzJVKqyHwwipaKdOFaLwCwpjI1vigNer~oM3K-yGGc3ACJWi5R0KpTmLUjSAjP7WfRmIRmrzSh8g~D6EmXpSmAt~HgX0N6igda3k9CNTLRE40sYqGR-VasVVWHwa88orVLosAs42DVpu8WY4hZcUgT7bRLG5NDYi7BzDo2RuPErVxO2WsZ6fjAWaMklxMAEmOMxCIyY29yVQ2kFTA3NZ-Ges3QE0F5gopq-yrAgSPRtOYX6hj9mI8Kp3nQEi03TfbCMXq8WvivHJmcHi5vsSUiA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Codington County Commission on April 15 authorized staff to send a notice to bidders for the County Road 20 paving project, the second stage of work to blacktop a segment that was reconstructed and widened last year.

Randy, representing the county highway department, told the commission the work would follow last year’s reconstruction and that staff hoped to complete the paving by fall. A commissioner asked whether the project covers a roughly two‑mile stretch \"from 81 over to 11;\" highway staff confirmed the segment and described it as a continuation of prior reconstruction.

Randy also presented the department's monthly report: crews were out four consecutive days during the most recent snowstorm and focused afterward on crack repair, ditch and right‑of‑way work on County Road 11‑2 and County Road 7‑2, and pre‑construction coordination with the South Dakota Department of Transportation on a State Highway 25 project that will use County Road 27 as a detour. Randy said the DOT inspected the road and agreed to repair any damage once the state project concludes; he expects that state work to finish in late fall.

Motion to authorize the notice to bidders was made by Commissioner Johnson and seconded by Commissioner Gable. The motion passed by voice vote.

","The commission authorized a notice to bidders for the second stage of County Road 20 — blacktopping a segment previously reconstructed — and heard a highway department report on recent winter work and retirements.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6271174,"Codington County approves pilot to integrate Aladtec scheduling with TimeClock Plus to handle law‑enforcement overtime",548,173000,721000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3029414-820c4e7e0f08c4120b1ac3aed138bd08&start=173&end=721","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3029414-820c4e7e0f08c4120b1ac3aed138bd08/thumbnail_173000.jpg","/articles/6271174/Codington-County/South-Dakota/Codington-County-approves-pilot-to-integrate-Aladtec-scheduling-with-TimeClock-Plus-to-handle-lawenforcement-overtime","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6271174-efd6580a76d221602703a0c71bfae869/orig.mp4?Expires=1770698325&Signature=Aq3wVlwhg5nI9iJlgqN4rsonJm9B2myoziM84VvTUwLey6dJR2SX17xwNE4jxgPQ64Q78u9Bo~pTjr~O3mCrsNPrtf9oAA9FzMlRy1cIpjkSVspMANmttlV7Q0No0YOTubltqxoi9ukZQq3nnkrLZnQ7zs-LCnEMpp7N7Nm852elvHRH11i-X0p6WRZlYK8gX73FVQVrnuBCWEz2YpDXOVn2EjG-4EHjGnbR0YMlkBhNtOY3g3nD6FSlrvRWVNaIJtKBulGDhVG1wwfcvkrDGE6osFlKhpIXMBf1ZI7RaGjAf0FF5MWy7nKbK73xB-aKOemomnk2I7OZkDSSRmK1pA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Codington County Commission on April 15 approved a pilot partnership with Aladtec to integrate scheduling with the county's TimeClock Plus (TCP) time‑tracking system, aiming to address overtime and accrual calculations for law‑enforcement and corrections staff.

Brent Solum, chief deputy with the Codington County Sheriff's Office, told commissioners the county has held twice‑weekly meetings with TCP staff to configure accruals and that the department faces complex scheduling needs: \"As you can imagine, the accruals are extremely difficult to navigate through that process, and there's a lot of customizing that we gotta do.\" He said Aladtec — recently acquired by TCP — would provide a scheduling layer that can flag when shifts extend beyond an employee's scheduled hours so overtime is calculated correctly for workers on 8‑, 10‑ and 12‑hour rotations.

The county accepted Aladtec's offer to waive integration fees for a pilot and to provide extra implementation resources. County staff presented a quote during the meeting and said the vendor proposed a first‑year charge and an annual per‑year subscription thereafter; staff described the price to commissioners as an initial payment of $4,650 for the first year and $3,600 in recurring annual costs. Commissioners questioned the paperwork, pointing out other lines in the vendor document that appeared to show different figures; county staff said the contract also contains an annual termination clause tied to non‑appropriation so the county would not be locked into a multi‑year obligation.

Commission discussion focused on scope and on which employees would be covered. Solum said the pilot would include only employees with irregular shift patterns that cannot be configured in TCP (primarily deputies and corrections staff), while standard 8‑to‑5 employees could be handled in TCP without Aladtec. Commissioners also noted potential staff time savings for the corrections office if the system reduced manual time adjustments.

Motion to approve the pilot partnership was made by Commissioner Gable and seconded by Commissioner McElhinney. The commission approved the motion by voice vote; the clerk recorded the motion as carried.

County staff said they will circulate the vendor quote and continue configuration work with TCP and Aladtec as the pilot begins. The vendor will provide implementation support during the pilot; commissioners asked staff to return with any material changes to cost or contract terms.

","The Codington County Commission approved a pilot partnership with Aladtec to integrate employee scheduling with TimeClock Plus to better track overtime and complex shift accruals for deputies and corrections staff. Commissioners voted to proceed after questions about cost and contract terms.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Votes at a glance: Codington County Commission actions April 15 — claims, travel, and executive session

Codington County authorizes notice to bidders for County Road 20 paving project

Codington County approves pilot to integrate Aladtec scheduling with TimeClock Plus to handle law‑enforcement overtime