Nevada's Senate Bill 173 is making waves as it targets the controversial use of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in cookware. Introduced on April 16, 2025, the bill aims to protect consumers from harmful chemicals often linked to health risks, including cancer and hormonal disruptions.
At the heart of SB173 is a clear mandate: cookware manufacturers must not sell products containing intentionally added PFAS in any surface that comes into contact with food or beverages. To further empower consumers, products that meet the criteria can proudly display a “NO PFAS” label, signaling their safety. However, the bill does allow for exemptions based on the size and labeling capabilities of the cookware.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free The legislation has sparked significant debate among lawmakers and industry stakeholders. Proponents argue that the bill is a crucial step toward safeguarding public health and promoting transparency in consumer products. Critics, however, raise concerns about the economic impact on manufacturers, particularly small businesses that may struggle to comply with the new regulations.
The implications of SB173 extend beyond consumer safety. Experts suggest that this legislation could set a precedent for other states considering similar measures, potentially reshaping the cookware industry nationwide. As the bill moves through the legislative process, its future remains uncertain, but its potential to influence both public health policy and market practices is undeniable.
With a civil penalty of up to $1,000 for violations, SB173 underscores Nevada's commitment to addressing environmental and health concerns associated with PFAS. As discussions continue, the outcome of this bill could have lasting effects on consumer safety and industry standards in the state and beyond.