Attorney General Nessel outlines Michigan's consumer protection reforms and legal cases against federal government

The Michigan Judiciary Committee convened on April 16, 2025, to discuss several pressing issues, including consumer protection, guardianship, and the effectiveness of various legal programs. A significant portion of the meeting focused on the ongoing challenges and developments surrounding the Michigan Consumer Protection Act, particularly in light of a pending case involving Eli Lilly.

Attorney General Dana Nessel highlighted the importance of the case, which questions whether the Consumer Protection Act applies to regulated industries. Nessel expressed frustration over the Michigan Supreme Court's request for additional briefings, delaying a decision that could have significant implications for consumer rights in the state. She emphasized that Michigan's current consumer protection laws are among the most limited in the country, leaving residents vulnerable to unscrupulous practices.

The committee also addressed the need for legislative fixes to enhance consumer protections, particularly for small businesses and nonprofits. Nessel noted that her office receives approximately 24,000 calls and emails annually regarding consumer issues, underscoring the demand for stronger legal frameworks.

In addition to consumer protection, discussions included the success of the "Okay to Save" program, which aims to empower students to report threats anonymously. Nessel reported positive outcomes from the program, which has now transitioned to the Michigan State Police for better management.

The meeting also celebrated the achievements of the Jobs Court initiative, which has maintained a 0% recidivism rate among its graduates. Nessel shared that recent graduations from the program demonstrate its effectiveness in helping young individuals secure stable careers.

Overall, the meeting underscored the committee's commitment to enhancing legal protections for Michigan residents and addressing critical issues within the state's judicial system. The discussions set the stage for potential legislative actions aimed at improving consumer rights and supporting rehabilitation programs.