Residents oppose battery storage facility citing health and environmental dangers

In a charged atmosphere at the Churchill County Board of County Commissioners special meeting on April 16, 2025, residents voiced their deep concerns over a proposed battery storage facility, highlighting fears about environmental safety and community health. The meeting, held in Fallon, drew passionate testimonies from locals, many of whom shared personal experiences that underscored the potential risks associated with the facility.

One resident, a respiratory patient, recounted the challenges of accessing adequate medical care for respiratory issues in the community, emphasizing the need for careful consideration of health impacts related to the facility. “I have to be careful,” they stated, reflecting on the necessity of traveling to Reno for treatment, a burden that many in the audience could relate to. The speaker's frustration was palpable as they criticized the government's response to environmental concerns, insisting that the community deserves better than superficial solutions.

Another resident, Kelsey Owens, expressed her opposition to the facility, citing recent lithium battery fires that have raised alarms about safety. She detailed the toxic risks associated with lithium-ion battery fires, including the release of hazardous gases and heavy metals that could contaminate local water sources and harm both wildlife and human health. “This placement threatens our families, our fish, our birds, our farm, our livestock,” Owens warned, urging the commissioners to reconsider the location of the facility.

Cody Qualtieri added to the chorus of dissent, highlighting the geographical challenges that could hinder emergency response efforts in the event of a disaster. He painted a vivid picture of the potential consequences of a fire in the area, noting that the topography and weather conditions could exacerbate any incident. “It seems like a case study on the worst place to put it,” he remarked, echoing the sentiments of many who fear for their safety and the safety of their community.

The meeting also featured emotional testimonies from long-time residents like Esther Moore, who shared her own history with environmental hazards in the area. Moore recounted the impact of past industrial activities on her health and the health of her horses, drawing parallels to the current situation. Her story resonated with many in the audience, reinforcing the urgency of addressing community concerns.

As the meeting concluded, it was clear that the proposed battery storage facility has ignited a passionate debate in Churchill County. Residents are calling for a thorough examination of the potential risks and a more transparent dialogue with officials. The commissioners now face the challenge of balancing the push for renewable energy with the pressing need to protect the health and safety of their constituents. The outcome of this discussion could shape the future of the community, as residents remain vigilant and engaged in the decision-making process.