[{"_1":2,"_99":-5,"_100":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6269517,"mediaKeyId","3043692-1ddbee3e24aa01c28845f09c483eb6b6","parentId",3043692,"title","Board restores short-term funding for youth and legal services as debate over unspent CareFirst/Measure J dollars continues","audioSeconds",200,"startMs",15145000,"endMs",15345000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=3043692-1ddbee3e24aa01c28845f09c483eb6b6&start=15145&end=15345","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3043692-1ddbee3e24aa01c28845f09c483eb6b6/thumbnail_15145000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6269517/Los-Angeles-County/California/Board-restores-short-term-funding-for-youth-and-legal-services-as-debate-over-unspent-CareFirstMeasure-J-dollars-continues","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6269517-96d929f20f346019cc14bdde0709d331/orig.mp4?Expires=1775042666&Signature=PjBlHGpf0mL8uWCVgVqUYRo3ERziU2gQHz0SJbDqgh~9Oys150mhdnjiU7Id0aXGzynNFY5YAX-VM3rx-9WzepBmV906lNuX2gAzDf3JHXKhq8Fkw7zepogbAY9inQjcGFMK7ihOpLhbICMzGkO9Jp4chmolj9JeO1~8p~CCVF1WqF3tjU0M-AQ25e0U25OABmaVDtUnn~g8P~8Mfi5USDWT5FiWA6UlRwTDRzFvu5JrN1FHqbCiPsH-DY4B2FvsIE2c4uTmqEK7Lh2xU8D7NH7t-IhprnbE9qLrOX3OhfR-rFkDWP8dtfV2L49M28BIGzKqWO43ljpYl-nNokwzow__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Los Angeles County CA","date","2025-04-17T23:56:02.69Z","article","The Board of Supervisors voted April 15 to restore interim funding for several homelessness-prevention and youth programs after an extended public comment period that featured dozens of service providers, program graduates and legal advocates. The motion co-authored by Supervisors Holly Mitchell and Kathryn Barger (motion in chief) preserved roughly $5.6 million for transitional-age-youth (TAY) programming, secured a near-term allocation for legal services used to prevent or end homelessness, and directed the Chief Executive Office to provide follow-up reporting and options to restore additional funding in later budget phases.

Why it mattered: The funding fight at the April 15 meeting focused on unspent funds connected to CareFirst Community Investments (CFCI) and Measure J — the voter-approved initiative that redirected county funds to community alternatives to incarceration and to supportive services. Community members and the CFCI advisory committee told supervisors they had identified more than $200 million in unspent CFCI dollars and urged the board to allocate those funds to community-based organizations. The county CEO’s office proposed reallocating some unspent balances toward county departments’ priorities, prompting debate about process and community control.

Board action and next steps: The board-approved motion required the CEO to report back on available fund balance and to return with options for supplemental funding restoration; it also directed County counsel and county staff to review limits on which entities (for example, the Los Angeles County Affordable Housing Solutions Agency, “La Casa”) may or may not execute prevention funding under state law. Members of the CFCI advisory committee — and members of the public who testified — urged the board to preserve the advisory committee’s central role in recommending how community-investment dollars are spent.

Public testimony: Dozens of public commenters urged restoration of specific community programs and legal services. Dozens of LA:RISE participants and staff told the board the county should not cut the employment-first transitional-work program (LA:RISE). One participant testified, “LA RISE is a pathway to possibility,” and multiple legal-aid providers warned that PEP (Preventing and Ending Homelessness legal services) prevents evictions, secures benefits and avoids placements in shelters. The board’s motion protects those priorities in the near term and directs follow-up reports to the board.

Process tensions: The April 15 exchange exposed friction between the CEO’s office and the CFCI advisory committee over how unspent dollars should be reallocated. The advisory panel and community advocates said the CEO proposed reallocations without fully following the board’s Measure J process; the CEO and budget staff said they needed to consider countywide obligations and timing constraints to avoid contract gaps on July 1. The board’s motion asks the CEO to return with a written plan that clarifies what can and cannot be funded through La Casa and how remaining unspent funds can be moved to community priorities in line with board policy and state law.

Ending: The motion passed with recorded support from the supervisors present at the time of the vote, and the board asked the CEO to deliver written follow-up within two weeks and additional options during the supplemental budget phase.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors Meeting 4/15/25","oneSentenceSummary","The Board restored interim funding April 15 for transitional-age-youth programs and for legal services that help prevent homelessness after hours of public testimony and a prolonged debate over unspent CareFirst/Measure J dollars and who should decide how those funds are spent.","taxTitle","Los Angeles County, California","taxId",2588,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6269523,"County CEO proposes $47.9 billion FY2025-26 budget, warns of $4 billion AB 218 settlement and wildfire losses",1102,14987000,16089000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3043692-1ddbee3e24aa01c28845f09c483eb6b6&start=14987&end=16089","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3043692-1ddbee3e24aa01c28845f09c483eb6b6/thumbnail_14987000.jpg","/articles/6269523/Los-Angeles-County/California/County-CEO-proposes-479-billion-FY2025-26-budget-warns-of-4-billion-AB-218-settlement-and-wildfire-losses","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6269523-614f450841aaff8f8ef16ca362f7295e/orig.mp4?Expires=1775042666&Signature=VKkU1DIO~qs378C4GJ5ACotaq8jdxfPrn9lhGUqh59Y7p5Mnb~FvEzKNZiUYbzf8LlZfxglD8Nd03TrX85KMn~IVtXd10DUeQU2DDZMSbV4ASYYO8bSYzpCZoEaSDUH5O4e9hBMDd-Nis3szEFU7rMkRt4UqXh8WOe-nf9pk8NXA1~RIGPns9AJROMzufy3y3yRsfuOLmmLsPvM91b8K83MnkROGkOcX9ekfW3j4L6kfOUBagIz3s4BqT1DO7544e6NBiiOBsaMvq-Fo3seNmUdKnMG3oL1vlK12VjVobOcezJ1g3is-VYuuFxJi4QQ1vlqXeGhmWjmqhO1qea0yLw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Fesia Davenport, Los Angeles County Chief Executive Officer, delivered the recommended fiscal year 2025–26 budget to the Board of Supervisors at the Board’s April 15 meeting and described “a road ahead of us [that] is difficult and paved with a series of unprecedented challenges.” The proposed budget totals $47.9 billion and, the CEO said, represents a reduction of nearly $1.3 billion from the current-year final budget figure.

Davenport emphasized the large, multi-year fiscal headwinds driving the recommendation: a tentative, countywide settlement of AB 218 claims that the CEO characterized as the costliest settlement in county history (treated in her presentation as roughly $4 billion), direct and indirect wildfire impacts totaling at least $1 billion and likely approaching $2 billion once all losses and response costs are tallied, and a significantly softer revenue outlook driven by housing-market churn and lower property‑tax growth. The presentation also noted an immediate new ongoing revenue forecast of roughly $234 million — far below departments’ combined requests and insufficient to cover more than a portion of new demands.

Planned adjustments and priorities: Davenport said the recommended budget includes a 3% curtailment requirement for most departments, elimination of 310 vacant positions and targeted savings totaling nearly $89 million in ongoing reductions. The package shows 14 net new positions overall — the result of adding 324 positions in targeted areas while removing 310 vacant positions. Departments submitted roughly $2.4 billion in new requests; the CEO deferred $815 million for later consideration and identified about $1.3 billion in unmet needs.

Davenport said the county will rely on a combination of fund balance, cuts and borrowing to address the AB 218 settlement costs and stressed uncertainty over federal and state funding flows. She noted a recent rescission notification of roughly $45 million in public‑health grant funds, warned that federal funding makes up a significant share of county resources, and said FEMA reimbursements for wildfire response can take years to materialize. The presentation also set out a number of continuing investments in the recommended budget, including Measure A homelessness allocations and investments to support upcoming large events and county governance changes under Measure G.

Supervisor response and public comment: Supervisors pressed the CEO and department leaders on the budget’s assumptions, asking for follow-up work on specific items including the county’s fire response costs and a request for a public explanation of the “curtailment” logic that eliminates funded-but-vacant positions. Supervisors also sought more granular reports on Measure A allocations and the budgetary implications of possible federal cuts to Medicaid and other programs. Supervisors emphasized preserving core safety-net programs while protecting the county’s long-term fiscal stability.

Board action: The Board took action on the recommended budget during the meeting; the recommended budget was approved by recorded vote in the meeting with supervisors recorded in favor.","Los Angeles County Chief Executive Officer Fesia Davenport presented a $47.9 billion recommended budget to the Board of Supervisors on April 15, saying the county faces an unprecedented combination of a tentative $4 billion AB 218 settlement, significant wildfire costs and a decline in new ongoing revenue.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6269528,"LASD reports improved force metrics to supervisors but monitors and officials warn gaps remain under ROSA",1314,2126000,3440000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3043692-1ddbee3e24aa01c28845f09c483eb6b6&start=2126&end=3440","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3043692-1ddbee3e24aa01c28845f09c483eb6b6/thumbnail_2126000.jpg","/articles/6269528/Los-Angeles-County/California/LASD-reports-improved-force-metrics-to-supervisors-but-monitors-and-officials-warn-gaps-remain-under-ROSA","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6269528-f923d49f8331188762837d29067b564f/orig.mp4?Expires=1775042666&Signature=Cz1DY22XlhYRqAwidDBzbHPgRrJefaUJfArRUi9YP7Cez63d2hpJIyIubiYniwttxd904CaT50vQF0j1vYvN4uGCC6EmU0kyScNtvcPM83DO42KVwNyfwMuYDWf1VUzfv4dXnY0eX803xeF2cDpofITtaYlySt5zOWb0i3j-nXG3gv-3VDZT1gDvtA~2pslOv-HofvzandxRzYGtBZpC9qYtZ2naka0CmlXbjjd2moOrO8rt3XuGHWYhtO-s1M2I1vQ8H2Drz5CQJVeOLS-wRiPhOQ1HZWRv7UmpkH2vGEYc77TOad5-BBGkhkFrxIHIUmH3Zt28JySJq~KO6n6COA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Assistant Sheriff Paula Tokar told the Board of Supervisors on April 15 that the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department (LASD) has increased compliance with the ROSA settlement agreement and reduced some types of force since formal tracking began. The department said it improved compliance from 78 provisions to 81 and reported a long-term decline in overall force incidents and specific declines in serious uses of force.

The presentation included several concrete measures of change: a 35.9% decrease in overall force incidents since 2018 (with a modest uptick in 2024), a 57% decrease in “category 2” uses of force between 2018 and 2024 in basin facilities, and a 60% decrease in tracked head strikes since 2021. Tokar described operational fixes linked to the department’s compliance shortfall on provision 17.5, saying in the meeting, “We will no longer be doing [the] seated position as a recovery position and we will be putting everyone on their side as required by the provisions.” She also highlighted the rollout of body scanners, a pilot eForce application to speed force-package processing, and progress standing up CFIT (10 of 12 budgeted sergeants filled).

Monitors and board members said the data show some real improvement — particularly in investigative quality — but warned important gaps remain between what the monitors find and what the department reports. Robert Houston of the monitoring team said the CFIT work has yielded “more detailed analysis and more timeliness of investigation” and recommended that the process for reviewing completed investigations be made more objective and timely. Monitors noted CFIT recommended 37 administrative investigations and that the department opened administrative investigations in 19 of those cases.

Supervisors pressed the department on staffing, overtime and accountability. Supervisor Mitchell said the county can’t lose sight of ROSA’s purpose, telling the department, “every time I hear the term head strike, it just sends a chill down my back,” and pressing officials on why the monitors and the department sometimes reach different conclusions on compliance. Tokar and other LASD leaders said the difference stems partly from how small samples of cases are selected, differing interpretations of the facts of particular incidents, and evolving policy and training after changes in leadership and policy.

Board members and monitors also discussed the new CFIT unit’s role in centralizing force investigations. Monitors said investigative quality has improved since CFIT was created, but they urged the department to ensure CFIT’s recommendations lead to a greater proportion of administrative investigations when appropriate, and to strengthen the objectivity of command-level review. LASD described internal changes to increase objectivity — for example, routing disagreements about administrative-investigation recommendations up to the division chief rather than stopping at the captain.

What’s next: LASD said body-worn camera rollout and tablets for custody will take time — training was expected in May, and monitors noted new evidence will not be reflected in public reports for more than a year because the monitors review cases with a lag. The Board’s public record shows the department’s compliance presentation was received and filed by the board during the meeting.

Provenance: The presentation and the exchange with monitors and supervisors were given during the ROSA compliance item on April 15, 2025, and appear in the public transcript for the Board meeting.

Ending: Monitors, LASD and supervisors agreed there has been measurable progress on some ROSA provisions and investigative quality. But monitors and several supervisors urged continued focus on objective review, timely accountability, staffing, and the full rollout of body-worn cameras and other technology before declaring the settlement fully implemented.","Assistant Sheriff Paula Tokar told the Board of Supervisors on April 15 that LASD improved compliance with the ROSA settlement and reduced several measures of force, but monitoring teams and supervisors said remaining gaps in accountability and review processes must be closed.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Board restores short-term funding for youth and legal services as debate over unspent CareFirst/Measure J dollars continues

County CEO proposes $47.9 billion FY2025-26 budget, warns of $4 billion AB 218 settlement and wildfire losses

LASD reports improved force metrics to supervisors but monitors and officials warn gaps remain under ROSA