Judge approves felony drug court referral for Stephanie Sandoval's probation violation case

In a tense morning session at the 187th District Court on April 17, 2025, Judge Stephanie Boyd presided over a case that highlighted the struggles of a mother, Stephanie Sandoval, grappling with the aftermath of personal tragedy and substance abuse. The courtroom was filled with a palpable sense of urgency as Sandoval faced the possibility of a lengthy prison sentence due to violations of her probation.

Sandoval, who has been on probation since 2019, admitted to violating the conditions of her community supervision, particularly condition number five. The court was informed that she had missed multiple drug tests and had a history of substance abuse, including the use of amphetamines. The gravity of her situation was underscored when Judge Boyd made it clear that she could impose a sentence of up to 20 years in prison.

The emotional weight of the proceedings was evident as Sandoval recounted the tragic death of her partner, Ricardo Arano, who had been a significant support in her life and the care of their three-year-old daughter. His passing left her overwhelmed, struggling to manage her responsibilities as a mother while dealing with her own mental health issues, including ADHD and PTSD. Sandoval expressed her desire to reunite with her child, emphasizing that she did not want her daughter to lose both parents.

As the discussions unfolded, Judge Boyd presented Sandoval with two stark choices: either accept a referral to felony drug court or face a three-year prison sentence. The judge highlighted the importance of honesty and commitment to recovery, noting that the drug court program would work in conjunction with child protective services to support her rehabilitation and potential reunification with her daughter.

Ultimately, the court decided to deny the motion to revoke Sandoval's probation, opting instead to extend her supervision for two more years. The conditions included a referral to felony drug court, mandatory drug testing, and a requirement to attend 160 sober meetings within 160 days of her release. Judge Boyd emphasized the necessity of supervised contact with minors, including her daughter, as part of the ongoing child welfare considerations.

This case serves as a poignant reminder of the complexities surrounding addiction, family dynamics, and the judicial system's role in addressing these challenges. As Sandoval embarks on this new chapter, the court's decision reflects a commitment to rehabilitation over punishment, offering her a chance to reclaim her life and, hopefully, her family.