Mesa Council reviews RS 15 zoning proposal for new 65-lot residential development

A recent Planning and Zoning meeting in Mesa, Arizona, highlighted significant community concerns regarding a proposed residential development that aims to rezone agricultural land for housing. The proposal involves converting 30 acres of land from agricultural (AG) to residential (RS 15) with a planned area development, which would allow for 65 lots ranging from 10,400 to 22,619 square feet.

Residents voiced strong opposition to the project, citing concerns about increased density and its impact on the surrounding desert landscape. Originally proposed for 81 units, the developer reduced the plan to 65 units, lowering the density from 2.83 to 2.27 dwelling units per acre. Despite this reduction, many community members believe the development is still inconsistent with the existing neighborhood, which features larger lot sizes of half an acre to one acre.

Key issues raised during the public comment portion included the proposed deviations from standard zoning regulations. Neighbors expressed worries about smaller lot sizes, reduced setbacks, and increased lot coverage, which they feel would lead to homes being built too close together. One resident emphasized the importance of maintaining consistency with the established character of the area, arguing that the proposed changes would detract from the neighborhood's appeal.

The developer conducted outreach efforts, holding two neighborhood meetings to address concerns. However, many residents remain skeptical about the project's alignment with the community's needs and values. They fear that the proposed changes could lead to a denser development that does not fit with the surrounding environment.

City staff recommended approval of the project, stating it complies with the Mesa General Plan and relevant city codes. The meeting concluded with a commitment to further review the community's feedback before making a final decision on the rezoning request. As the city moves forward, the balance between development and preserving community character remains a critical focus for residents and officials alike.