The Regular City Council meeting held on October 23, 2001, in Los Angeles focused on several key agenda items, with significant discussions surrounding the commemoration of former Mayor Tom Bradley and a business tax reform proposal.
The meeting commenced with procedural updates, including a call for the next item on the agenda, which was item number 40. This item involved a public hearing regarding the naming of the 27th floor of City Hall as the Tom Bradley Tower. Council member Holden introduced the motion, emphasizing Bradley's substantial contributions to the city, including his tenure as the longest-serving mayor of Los Angeles. The council unanimously approved the motion, and a ceremony is scheduled for the following Friday at 9 AM, where family members and friends of Bradley will be present.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free Council member Holden highlighted Bradley's journey from his early life in Texas to his impactful career in law enforcement and politics, noting that he served 52 years in various capacities, including as a police officer and elected official. The council's decision to honor Bradley aims to ensure that future visitors to City Hall will remember his legacy.
Following the discussion on Tom Bradley, the council moved to item number 1, called special by council member Reyes. This item addressed a business tax reform proposal with an estimated cost of approximately $4 million. Council member Weiss noted a difference of opinion between the Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) and the Chief Legislative Analyst (CLA) regarding the handling of this proposal, indicating ongoing discussions about the financial implications of the reform.
The meeting concluded with the council's approval of the motion to honor Tom Bradley, reflecting a commitment to recognizing significant historical figures in the city's governance. Further discussions on the business tax reform are expected as the council continues to navigate budgetary considerations.