During the recent Midland Planning and Zoning meeting on April 21, 2025, a significant discussion centered around a proposed zoning change for a vacant property currently designated as an O-1 Office District. The applicant seeks to rezone the property to an RR Regional Retail District to establish an automotive service center. However, this request has sparked considerable community concern.
The property is surrounded by various zoning classifications, including planned development districts for industrial use to the north and residential areas to the south and west. The proposed automotive service center has raised alarms among nearby residents, with 15 objections received—nine from within a 200-foot buffer zone. The primary concerns expressed were increased traffic and safety issues, particularly given the high volume of 29,000 vehicles per day on the adjacent State Highway 349.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free City staff recommended denial of the zoning change, citing incompatibility with the Tall City Tomorrow Plan, which emphasizes lower-density commercial uses and residential development. The future land use plan designates the area for urban medium development, supporting single-family and multi-family housing, schools, and parks, rather than higher-intensity commercial uses like an automotive service center.
The applicant, Adam Sturtevant, argued that the proposed facility would generate less traffic than typical restaurants or other businesses in the area. He emphasized that the existing traffic conditions should not hinder the development, as the service center would cater to the already established traffic flow. Sturtevant also noted that the property is separated from residential areas by a busy highway, which he believes mitigates potential disturbances.
Despite the applicant's reassurances, city officials highlighted the need for a supermajority vote due to the significant objections from local residents. The discussion also touched on alternative zoning options, such as a Planned Development (PD) that could impose specific conditions to address community concerns while allowing for the desired automotive service use.
As the meeting concluded, the commission faced the challenge of balancing the applicant's business interests with the community's concerns about traffic and safety. The outcome of this zoning request will have lasting implications for the neighborhood, as it navigates the complexities of urban development and community needs. The next steps will involve further deliberation by the city council, which will ultimately decide the fate of the proposed zoning change.