[{"_1":2,"_87":-5,"_88":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6580588,"mediaKeyId","3071385-3300ae5a50c109ba0775cb1027540b70","parentId",3071385,"title","Votes at a glance: Valley County approves property tax exemptions, adopts reconsideration ordinance; PUD amendment for Tamarack Resort passes with one abstain","audioSeconds",852,"startMs",1704000,"endMs",2556000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=3071385-3300ae5a50c109ba0775cb1027540b70&start=1704&end=2556","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3071385-3300ae5a50c109ba0775cb1027540b70/thumbnail_1704000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6580588/Valley-County/Idaho/Votes-at-a-glance-Valley-County-approves-property-tax-exemptions-adopts-reconsideration-ordinance-PUD-amendment-for-Tamarack-Resort-passes-with-one-abstain","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6580588-4a9964f35abfb5c46483c37b9e169ea2/orig.mp4?Expires=1771138733&Signature=UsZwCmTBw1ZnFY8WWPnpH75zPpaVfbI3MigGDf8GTBcIbR88sLmMtFJjReB8JMRXENsx2ny779TVyw3mC53yAKdWyi2KSzMc4uWPTtA8L1foIAjLosHcZmZqKSLtMK8UyxIqE0peauDVRpeLI-Sm~U5EY~irdJ~5iADnQPOOhtT4MgwdbJcgHR7jF7fVnbAISIZmoJdNgMwuoaoz98zIo99imFLlT9hVBP3-mEm09nE66HZdJSz~f60ERcivMIyIkS80ZI1YaIcuww~WxbhCawF6~mevw93~oPHmSMchehDjwEJwDfX5MP9edRQw6Hrfc-StPsiyBCs26U0hZBMywg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Valley County","date","2025-04-21T18:17:52.047Z","article","The Valley County Board of County Commissioners took a series of formal actions on April 21, 2025, including approval of multiple property-tax exemptions, passage of a new reconsideration ordinance for land-use matters, and approval of a planned-unit-development amendment and parking-lot relocation at Tamarack Resort. One low-income housing exemption was denied for failing to meet Idaho code and one bridge-extension signature was not approved.

Nut graf: The meeting produced several administrative approvals that affect nonprofit and healthcare property-tax status across the county, clarified a process for reconsideration of land-use decisions, and advanced a major Tamarack Resort land-use amendment that relocates the Aspen parking area and adds a 60-unit townhome subdivision to an existing PUD. The board denied one low-income housing exemption application because the applicant did not meet the statutory percent-of-units test under Idaho code.

Key votes and formal actions (motions, outcomes, citations where provided):

1) Ordinance 2025-03, Motion for Reconsideration
- What passed: Adopted Ordinance 2025-03 to add Chapter 9-5-13 to the Valley County Code establishing a process for seeking reconsideration of land-use applications prior to judicial review (Idaho Code citation referenced in staff report: 67-65352b). A $1,500 fee for reconsideration had been adopted by separate Resolution 2025-08 (published/posted).
- Outcome: Approved (motion seconded; board unanimous vote in favor).
- Transcript provenance: staff report summary (s7731\u0000\u00113), and vote (s7919\u0000\u0013).

2) Change meeting days to Wednesdays for July, August and September 2025
- What passed: Board changed the commissioners' regular meeting schedule in July, August and September 2025 to Wednesdays, with packets to continue to be distributed the previous Thursday.
- Outcome: Approved (motion seconded; recorded 'Aye' votes).
- Transcript provenance: discussion and vote (s114.19\u0000\u001317 / s321.59\u0000\u001340).

3) Abstein Bridge: signature for an extension of a financial assistance award (term-sign amendment)
- Motion: Request that the chairman sign an amendment to the financial-assistance award for the Abstein Bridge project to allow later bidding/award.
- Outcome: Motion failed (moved and seconded; when board called for 'all in favor?' the response recorded was 'No').
- Notes: Staff had explained federal funding timing and property-owner contacts as reasons for seeking an extension; commissioners did not approve the signature at this meeting.
- Transcript provenance: presentation and motion (s371.51\u0000\u001396 / s466.77\u0000\u001479).

4) Reference letter for Clearwater Financial
- Motion: Approve a county reference letter supporting Clearwater Financial's grant applications (to be printed on county letterhead and signed by the chairman).
- Outcome: Approved (motion seconded; unanimous 'Aye' votes).
- Transcript provenance: staff request and motion (s535.15\u0000\u001556 / s581.30\u0000\u001592).

5) Property-tax exemption approvals and one denial (63-602 series)
The board approved a package of nonprofit and institutional property-tax exemptions after staff recommendations. For each, the transcript records the application ID or parcel reference where given and the board's recorded motion and vote.
- Capital Christian Center (Faith Heights Church Camp) RP12105: 89 days commercial use assessed, 276 days exempt (approved). (s1704\u0000\u0011722)
- Protestant Episcopal Church in Idaho (two parcels; parcel with church and adjacent parking): full exemption on RPM010b and RPM0110 (approved). (s1745\u0000\u0011753)
- Central Valley Baptist Church (parcel with church building): full exemption RBC00wb (approved). (s1768\u0000\u0011780)
- Grace Bible Church (parcel with church building): full exemption RTC1010b (approved; staff noted sale of building after Jan/Feb 2024 to be reviewed next year). (s1799\u0000\u001841)
- Southern Idaho Conference of Seventh-day Adventists (Ida Haven Church Camp) RP1E145: 16 days assessed, 349 days exempt (approved). (s1848\u0000\u001887)
- Heartland Hunger Resource Center LRM7365 (food bank): full exemption (approved). (s1909\u0000'18)
- Alpha Grange No. 368 RP16400 (Grange Hall): full exemption (approved). (s1923\u0000'56)
- Long Valley Preservation Society RP60590 (parcel used for parking lot supporting museum): full exemption (approved). (s1959\u0000\u001015)
- McCall Memorial Hospital District (10 parcels; RPM identifiers listed in staff report): full exemptions recommended and approved (approved). (s2027\u0000\u001169)
- St. Luke's (three parcels: RPM0090, RPM006b, RPM0080 as listed in staff notes): full exemptions recommended and approved (approved). (s2172\u0000'21)
- Low-income housing exemption (63-602gg series): applicant was found to be one rental unit short of the statutory threshold for the 25% test (applicant fell 1 unit short under Idaho code); staff recommended denial and the board voted to deny the application. The applicant name in the transcript is not consistently clear; staff and the board identified the denial was required because the statutory occupancy percentages were not met. (s2311\u0000\u0012495 / s2556\u0000\u0012600)

Notes on the exemptions: Staff repeatedly told the board they had contacted applicants in some cases multiple times before deadlines; several denials occurred where the applicant failed to submit by the statutory deadline (e.g., American Legion missed the April 15 deadline) or otherwise did not meet Idaho code requirements for the exemption sought. In the low-income housing case, staff recommended denial unless the applicant corrected the missing unit status; the board adopted staff's recommendation.

6) Tamarack Resort PUD 98-1 amendment; SUB-205-004 Phase 3.6 Aspen Townhomes and Trillium parking-lot relocation
- What passed: The board approved an amendment to PUD 98-1 to allow a 60-unit Aspen Townhomes subdivision (Phase 3.6) on land the original PUD had shown as a parking area, and approved expansion/relocation of the Trillium parking lot into an adjacent 5-acre parcel. Approved conditions of approval from Planning & Zoning were adopted; staff added a condition (no. 16) requiring recordation documents to incorporate remainder of R P 16 N 03 E 328900 into the PUD governance.
- Outcome: Approved (motion seconded; recorded vote in favor; Commissioner Caldwell recused/abstained due to a family member contract relationship).
- Transcript provenance: staff report and discussion (s8120\u0000'361 / s9334\u0000'378).

Process and next steps: The board directed staff to prepare findings and conclusions for the Tamarack action; staff said a simplified final decision could be ready by the next Monday because there was no recorded public opposition. Planning and permitting conditions and agency reviews (Central District Health, Idaho DEQ, ITD, fire marshal and Parametrix/engineering) remain part of the record and the approval is conditioned on those reviews and any required submittals.

Speakers (attribution whitelist for the Votes at a Glance article)
- County staff (Cinda / planning staff)
- Commissioner (unnamed speakers recorded votes)
- Applicant representative: Scott Turlington (Tamarack Resort representative)

Authorities referenced
- Idaho Code 67-65352(b) (referenced by staff in the reconsideration ordinance staff report)
- Valley County Ordinance 2025-03 (new chapter 9-5-13; fee adoption referenced to Resolution 2025-08)

Clarifying details and caveats
- Where parcel identifiers were read from staff reports, the article lists the IDs as stated in the staff record. In a small number of transcript passages the parcel or applicant name was not fully clear; those items are noted as \"not specified\" or paraphrased from staff explanation.

Provenance (selected evidence spans from the meeting transcript)
- PUD/Tamarack staff report and applicant presentation: transcript blocks beginning ~s8120\u0000\u0013961 through s9334\u0000'378.
- Property-tax exemption motions and votes: transcript block beginning ~s1704 through s2560; low-income housing denial discussion s2311\u0000\u0012495.

Ending: The actions finalize a set of routine but consequential administrative approvals that affect nonprofit property tax status across Valley County and approve a major land-use amendment at Tamarack Resort that will change the resort's parking and residential footprint. The board recorded one denial where an applicant did not meet Idaho statutory tests for an exemption.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Valley County Board of County Commissioner Meeting April 21, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","The Board of County Commissioners approved a slate of property tax exemptions, adopted an ordinance formalizing reconsideration procedures for land-use appeals, denied one low-income housing exemption application for not meeting Idaho code, and approved a Tamarack Resort PUD amendment and parking-lot relocation with one commissioner abstaining.","taxTitle","Valley County, Idaho","taxId",51032,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6580593,"Valley County commissioners defer sheriff's vehicle order despite temporary $6,500-per-car rebate; staff to return with funding options",546,664000,1210000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3071385-3300ae5a50c109ba0775cb1027540b70&start=664&end=1210","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3071385-3300ae5a50c109ba0775cb1027540b70/thumbnail_664000.jpg","/articles/6580593/Valley-County/Idaho/Valley-County-commissioners-defer-sheriffs-vehicle-order-despite-temporary-6500-per-car-rebate-staff-to-return-with-funding-options","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6580593-621ee3378aaee1d256fee1ffd5f4b251/orig.mp4?Expires=1771138733&Signature=H5UrCd3T0hQAskXH-DJSRYFb6zNdNcLG8aPptWXNHrMoeloWBSf4Y~PDcINkwLRECU4d1p~xyQDM7Z8KYNFFfMRAuFG3dKVgQT4Pqx-3fYIcOj6JuB6tDOee8GLgM0Cmux8gFpEQhgvcbURIz311~2nIta-sVMDcJX1wFNuDe9Gx7O-WoAt0rrd-sSATCFpDTN15em0EeAdL8LB0LzOnTFP3~2BIqTcqM2kXrPRO~Il~jxfiDGZb6y9HlXEYvsxzdVfd~5FHaeEi0sh3GfBs7-BSAUXJlex4iVecU9BVA3nwVkpE1jd8bWxK-p6mqwdlERgptl31SsxLasKQhmQ0FQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Valley County commissioners discussed whether to fast-track purchases of pursuit-rated police vehicles to capture a limited $6,500 per-car manufacturer rebate, but they did not authorize an immediate buy and asked the sheriff and budget staff to return with funding options next week.

The discussion, held April 21 during the Board of County Commissioners meeting in Cascade, focused on timing, budget-year alignment and delivery windows for pursuit-rated law-enforcement vehicles. The sheriff's office told commissioners the manufacturer's promotional window had temporarily risen from a $4,500 rebate to $6,500, and that delivery dates for pursuit-rated SUVs and Durangos were running 60\u001390 days, which could push delivery into the following fiscal year.

Commissioners pressed for clarity on funding. County staff said some capital funds historically used for vehicle purchases (including PILT and general fund balances) were at low levels; staff recommended any out-of-cycle purchase be funded from the general fund if the board wished to act now. The county's CIP committee recommended the sheriff request five vehicles in the fiscal-year 2026 CIP submission, with two procured in FY26 and three held for a later rebate window.

Why it matters: The county operates a small fleet and has used a three-vehicles-per-year plan in past budgets to manage mileage and replacement cycles. Manufacturer rebate windows and long delivery lead times create recurring budget-timing problems: if vehicles arrive after the fiscal year in which funds are appropriated, county accounting and capital planning become difficult.

Details from the meeting:
- County staff and the CIP committee said the rebate window often opens early in spring; staff noted the $6,500 level had been in place only about six weeks. They cautioned that the rebate could change again and there is no guarantee it will recur next year.
- The sheriff's office said pursuit-rated packages usually include upgraded suspension, cooling, brakes and other officer-safety features; pursuit packages also shift engine choices (for example, from Hemi to V6). Those technical choices affect delivery timing and unit cost.
- Commissioners asked whether the sheriff's vehicles could be repurposed to road or assessor departments after a patrol life-cycle; the sheriff's representative said pursuit packages are mainly officer-safety upgrades and can be repurposed for less demanding uses in some cases.
- Staff suggested options for funding a short-notice purchase: (1) use general fund reserves; (2) identify one-time non-PILT monies; or (3) include five vehicles in the FY26 CIP so two could be purchased under current market conditions and three reserved for a future rebate window.

Next steps and direction: The board did not vote to buy vehicles immediately. Commissioners asked staff to put the item on next week's agenda and asked the sheriff to return with an explicit list of available funding sources, the count of vehicles he could commit to buy, and the fiscal-year accounting implications. The CIP committee will provide its recommendations for a request of five vehicles in FY26 if the board chooses that route.

Speakers (attribution whitelist)
- Sheriff (Sheriff, government)
- Johanna (staff member, CIP committee)
- Doug (staff member)
- Commissioner Caldwell (Commissioner, Valley County Board of County Commissioners)

Discussion vs. decision: The meeting recorded a policy-level discussion and a direction to return with a formal funding proposal and precise numbers; no purchase authorization or budget appropriation was taken at this meeting.

Community relevance: The decision affects law-enforcement readiness, county capital budgets, and how quickly patrol vehicles with safety equipment can be placed into service. The board's direction to resolve funding before committing preserves general-fund reserve levels but delays any immediate rebate capture.","Commissioners discussed taking advantage of a limited-time $6,500 rebate on pursuit-rated police vehicles but did not approve an immediate purchase. The sheriff's office and CIP staff were asked to return next week with funding options and a formal request for fiscal-year budgeting.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Votes at a glance: Valley County approves property tax exemptions, adopts reconsideration ordinance; PUD amendment for Tamarack Resort passes with one abstain

Valley County commissioners defer sheriff's vehicle order despite temporary $6,500-per-car rebate; staff to return with funding options