[{"_1":2,"_111":-5,"_112":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87,99],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6580939,"mediaKeyId","3045283-98b96259dab236ba6cc57ebf5105f4a8","parentId",3045283,"title","Commission recommends denial of general plan amendment to convert 624 W. Fox Meadow Drive from commercial to residential","audioSeconds",2459,"startMs",1055000,"endMs",3514000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=3045283-98b96259dab236ba6cc57ebf5105f4a8&start=1055&end=3514","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3045283-98b96259dab236ba6cc57ebf5105f4a8/thumbnail_1055000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6580939/Pleasant-View/Weber-County/Utah/Commission-recommends-denial-of-general-plan-amendment-to-convert-624-W-Fox-Meadow-Drive-from-commercial-to-residential","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6580939-49de6805b3c6eb1bb6984c6cc0c80483/orig.mp4?Expires=1775279674&Signature=PXuypAsrLpAAZ-CqWIcEaQtvMr~Wr~poJ6hHI1IT65QAYNb522VDvAaok0OSkzXmd5EYZjTgqGu-uJv2z3RrIHLHgGlU2m21A-tTnIAdVzvo2FhPK88Cm6afrdKkl~21joy1oIPvUwCRlzMEcW99KgoUlPE2v0kH0KSOXNZXOqbrng9MaFgxIiQSvEJufiB80e93ZcFsGZcj8H8MCmBpyOovQvNwSj6dcmK4SxuyM1hG6y591DGhhkgBN5EyfFP99tsAjjS1dD9yJkN6tz7ms0shUh~5eSEfFo6eebQeiqsnLgKot7y6KsbxhJMtHVeJ-7Er5EuVA7Xt6jOvhxMawg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Pleasant View","date","2025-04-18T02:09:08.05Z","article","The Pleasant View Planning Commission recommended that the City Council deny a proposed general plan amendment to change approximately 0.29 acres at 624 West Fox Meadow Drive from planned commercial (CP‑1) to medium-density residential (proposed LSFR). The motion to recommend denial passed on a recorded vote after public comment and commissioner discussion.

Staff explained that the property was originally part of a development agreement tied to Fox Meadows that reserved roughly 1.559 acres for commercial use and that the development agreement runs with the land and is binding on successors. Tammy, planning staff, said the ownership of the northern lot in question had transferred to the homeowners association in 2024; the HOA petitioner said they sought the change to “clean it up” and convert the parcel into a buildable residential lot.

Paul Pitcher, speaking for the HOA, said the parcel is an “eyesore” and described its size as roughly 12,400 square feet; he said an individual home meeting city setbacks would fit and would be compatible with nearby Fox Meadows homes. Several commissioners and members of the public recounted a lengthy prior debate over this corridor: when the subdivision was approved, the planning commission and council had sought to preserve commercial frontage along the corridor and retained corner parcels for future commercial uses, in part to serve parking needs for any commercial uses across the street.

Commissioners expressed divided views: some favored preserving the commercial designation because it preserves the city’s options for future commercial development and parking needs; others said nine years had passed without commercial development and residents near the parcel had opposed active commercial uses backing onto their lots. The commission held a public hearing; no additional written statutes or state law were introduced.

A motion to recommend denial of the general plan amendment was made and seconded. The recorded result in the meeting transcript shows the recommendation to deny carried with four votes in favor and two opposing votes (two commissioners recorded as voting \"nay\"). The commission’s recommendation will be transmitted to City Council for final action.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Planning Commission - April 17, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","The Pleasant View Planning Commission voted to recommend denial of a proposed general plan amendment that would change 0.29 acres at 624 West Fox Meadow Drive from planned commercial to medium-density residential.","taxTitle","Pleasant View , Weber County, Utah","taxId",7508,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6580941,"Planning commission approves temporary landscape-materials site at 2367 N. U.S. 89 with staff review of temporary office",627,386000,1013000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3045283-98b96259dab236ba6cc57ebf5105f4a8&start=386&end=1013","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3045283-98b96259dab236ba6cc57ebf5105f4a8/thumbnail_386000.jpg","/articles/6580941/Pleasant-View/Weber-County/Utah/Planning-commission-approves-temporary-landscape-materials-site-at-2367-N-US-89-with-staff-review-of-temporary-office","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6580941-e9dde97cf0371d015781321266000d69/orig.mp4?Expires=1775279674&Signature=c9dSOZ-PIa4DDYStCG2hI01pEcTiYogNIBr~1ftLPC12kTAgA2YZv5zH1xcccbjW7Cr2dou7Dyh4LmSV2nF1titex-iSs3ymFJ57wJObnS1DWIOlpJVWYjU4fXOtmj7CF2qNla-8Pcoi5s1mVtIb6FZyz7RZ-DmBZW6y13diUlx~uCCAgv5DhBzJtppXH6Csrl3XRXUYadHi5V-00W2Kz9JHjsad3DKwKORVkBMoA4cY9w0j~~XxI80uX2RBVvAebKyvh6Q7ty~qN7VtiEJRBTz8uag8DTFhJTj1IvFt24MRD6Xy6B5VcLrvoGwkJdHj7K8wjJrAPg5bkTfv17y1uA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Pleasant View Planning Commission approved a site plan for a permitted temporary commercial use at approximately 2367 North U.S. Highway 89 but attached a condition requiring staff review of any proposed temporary office structures.

Tammy, planning staff, presented the application as a proposal for a seasonal landscape materials business on a vacant lot along Highway 89. Tammy told commissioners the petitioner had obtained required access approvals from Utah Department of Transportation and had met the Development Review Committee’s engineering conditions. Staff recommended approval of the site plan.

The petitioner, Rex Whitaker (33 73 North 700 West), told the commission he intended to use the site seasonally to sell bark and similar materials. Whitaker said he might “put a trailer like an office trailer there or something” to serve as an on-site office. Commissioners and staff raised questions about whether an office trailer or shed would be allowed and whether that would fall under building-permit, business-license, or site-plan review.

Commissioners agreed to approve the site plan with a condition that staff review any temporary office structure prior to issuance of business licenses or building permits. The commission’s approval requires the petitioner to obtain a temporary business license each year if he intends to operate seasonally and to comply with any city code limitations on nonpermanent structures.

The commission’s motion passed with a second from Commissioner Gosner and no recorded opposition. Staff will confirm whether a temporary office trailer or shed is permitted under the city’s ordinances when issuing permits and licenses.","The commission approved a site plan for a seasonal landscape materials business at 2367 North U.S. 89, subject to staff review of any temporary office trailers or similar structures to ensure compliance with city ordinances.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6580943,"Pleasant View planning commission approves utility easement vacation at 3581 N. 500 W.",101,273000,374000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3045283-98b96259dab236ba6cc57ebf5105f4a8&start=273&end=374","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3045283-98b96259dab236ba6cc57ebf5105f4a8/thumbnail_273000.jpg","/articles/6580943/Pleasant-View/Weber-County/Utah/Pleasant-View-planning-commission-approves-utility-easement-vacation-at-3581-N-500-W","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6580943-38d3a72cb9ed846093b45e37421ce688/orig.mp4?Expires=1775279674&Signature=nj0seL2DYueP0tw6cPZCg9dazYvQKRjF7fRxUkOY9bv2Y4IHOncS85aEyuD0bWWOw9KJ6A1wEU0xUB9ISCh4wC6Now58rZ1Eeqgo~v2EscVguooAeqqmjI2Dv2vJOiCZ93eeEbG63rkUyMq-mLKofcykscAQ~TPSv9gfuMI0Fcpwyz6LeYJ4BYGovRDP7G~4euIHDzu-3T1-W8kd0qj-ZnpND-GDcTbGfAp7fCbFhQLsgc7ZOTHe-AbdCpj9xOq1E5zq7DH18aEneWacD-Z10t~Qwjo3ixro2cJPk4PNHrTfUaPcCSmWU9NLr35yjaX0vO6pM1dZRHI9SGiB2IcaFQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Pleasant View Planning Commission voted to approve vacating a public utility easement for the property at 3581 North 500 West after staff said the petitioner had obtained letters of release from the public utility providers on the city’s required list.

Tammy, a city planning staff member, presented the request and told the commission that the petitioner had contacted all required utility groups and provided releases. Commissioner Dean moved to approve the vacation; the motion was seconded and carried without opposition.

The commission asked whether the petitioner had additional information for the record; staff confirmed there were no outstanding objections from utilities. Commissioners did not attach further conditions to the approval.

The approval authorizes staff to record the vacation consistent with the documentation provided by the petitioner and the city’s procedures for easement vacations.","The Pleasant View Planning Commission voted to approve a request to vacate a public utility easement for the residential property at 3581 North 500 West after staff confirmed utility providers had issued releases.",{"_33":100,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":101,"_41":102,"_43":103,"_45":104,"_47":105,"_49":106,"_51":107,"_53":108,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":109,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":110,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6580934,"Commission recommends approval of rezone for 475 W. Pleasant View Drive to LSFR with legal-description condition",1934,3618000,5552000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3045283-98b96259dab236ba6cc57ebf5105f4a8&start=3618&end=5552","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3045283-98b96259dab236ba6cc57ebf5105f4a8/thumbnail_3618000.jpg","/articles/6580934/Pleasant-View/Weber-County/Utah/Commission-recommends-approval-of-rezone-for-475-W-Pleasant-View-Drive-to-LSFR-with-legal-description-condition","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6580934-d4a449d493bc796798f6f8358999740f/orig.mp4?Expires=1775279674&Signature=nMb0wt4o3qUrFod~CzCNRVsYfskKQoPflOtx2JnQhAsh5b7nPGZEePvrsc5TMNOXPxp7IJ5UIY~G~gj80~14S00RxoFk32gp~etI9GtjQInmux0L6ysxBQxTwu3aJR0xZvX3eIY4Y5ptfDnasuXcvvpmVR1qZlceMTscm~ohva1ABgLNGYR4FSjFiz-zgky~8V3lb~~7MHZcu3zQkSYQ~IsrCU7yeBPAnBXrL1-jg-3gFHjccEJP6j9jR9~fLFhTvhQmvH6nRcMo9Rjl3eIFXNH6jJ8NfaDDDODf9U4yhqlwKIs9h1~Zrfnq-emY~ebaomlbhNRq3QMpU1bFJ6Mo9Q__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Pleasant View Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend rezoning about 6.31 acres at approximately 475 West Pleasant View Drive from Agricultural (A2) and very low‑density residential (RE20) to Agricultural (A2) and limited single‑family residential (LSFR). The recommendation included a stipulation that the rezone conform to the legal description that the City Council approved in a recent ordinance.

Tammy, planning staff, explained the proposed zone change aligns with a general plan amendment the city council approved on Feb. 11, 2025, and that the LSFR zone is intended to allow smaller single‑family lots and patio homes to achieve a cohesive neighborhood character. Staff told commissioners the conceptual lot layout submitted by the applicant meets the LSFR requirements for lot area and frontage, but the latest concept plan showed a boundary that did not match the ordinance’s legal description; staff recommended the applicant correct that detail during subsequent subdivision review.

Petitioner Jeff Lee (3280 North 850 West Pleasant View) described engineering and site work already completed, said geotechnical testing had been done, and confirmed the plan includes detention and drainage elements. He asked the commission to move the rezone forward. Several commissioners asked technical questions about roadway length and fire‑district turnaround standards; staff and the fire marshal said a hammerhead turn or similar apparatus can satisfy fire access standards where needed.

Commissioner John P. (motion maker) moved to recommend approval with the condition that the rezone conform to the legal description approved by the ordinance; the motion was seconded and passed unanimously. Staff will review the subdivision application for conformance with the approved legal description and coordinate any necessary clarifications with the applicant before the City Council hearing.","The planning commission recommended approval of a rezone for about 6.31 acres at 475 West Pleasant View Drive from A2/RE20 to A2/LSFR, attaching a condition that the rezone conform to the legal description approved previously by City Council.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Commission recommends denial of general plan amendment to convert 624 W. Fox Meadow Drive from commercial to residential

Planning commission approves temporary landscape-materials site at 2367 N. U.S. 89 with staff review of temporary office

Pleasant View planning commission approves utility easement vacation at 3581 N. 500 W.

Commission recommends approval of rezone for 475 W. Pleasant View Drive to LSFR with legal-description condition