Council debates traffic concerns and ownership status for McKellips development project

The Mesa City Council convened on April 7, 2025, to discuss various agenda items, with a significant focus on a proposed development project near the light rail. The meeting began with a discussion led by Council Member Adams, who questioned the projected vehicular traffic associated with the development. He expressed confusion over the high number of parking spaces proposed for a project labeled as transit-oriented development, which is typically designed to minimize car usage.

Eric, a representative involved in the traffic study, clarified that the traffic numbers were based on national averages and did not account for the proximity to transit options. He noted that while the development is near light rail, it is not directly adjacent, which could explain the anticipated vehicle trips.

The conversation shifted to the nature of the development—whether it would be for sale or for rent. Council Member Adams highlighted conflicting information from the applicant and city staff regarding the project's intent. He proposed a continuance to allow further discussions among the applicant, neighbors, and city staff to clarify these discrepancies.

Council Member Spidey supported the idea of a continuance, emphasizing the need for all parties to collaborate on the project. However, other council members expressed concerns about delaying the decision, citing the financial implications for the developer and the potential impact on housing costs.

The council debated the relevance of the ownership versus rental aspect, with some members arguing that it should not influence zoning decisions. City staff reiterated that zoning regulations do not enforce ownership or rental status, and any development could ultimately be rented out regardless of initial intentions.

As the meeting progressed, a motion for continuance was made, allowing time for further discussions and potential adjustments to the project. The council acknowledged the importance of balancing community needs with development goals, aiming for a resolution that would benefit both the neighborhood and the developer.

In conclusion, the Mesa City Council's meeting highlighted critical discussions surrounding a proposed development's traffic impact and its classification as a transit-oriented project. The decision to consider a continuance reflects the council's commitment to thorough deliberation and community engagement before moving forward. Further discussions are expected to address the concerns raised, with the aim of reaching a consensus that aligns with the city's housing objectives.