Judge acknowledges oversight in Zoom attendance options during court hearing

During a recent government meeting in Michigan, Judge David Krieger addressed a procedural oversight regarding the participation of legal counsel in a case involving the Department of Environment, Great Lakes and Energy. The judge acknowledged that he had failed to offer the option for attorneys to attend the hearing via Zoom, which could have alleviated travel challenges, especially given the inclement weather conditions.

In his remarks, Judge Krieger expressed regret for not considering remote attendance earlier, stating, "I should have said anybody could appear by Zoom. That was a mistake on my part." This admission highlights the importance of accessibility in legal proceedings, particularly for those who may face difficulties traveling to court.

The judge's oversight was particularly significant for attorneys who had traveled to attend the hearing in person, as they faced potential disruptions due to weather. By recognizing this issue, Judge Krieger emphasized the need for flexibility in court procedures to accommodate all participants, ensuring that justice is accessible to everyone involved.

As the meeting progressed, the judge encouraged the attorneys present to proceed with their arguments, demonstrating a commitment to moving forward despite the earlier miscommunication. This incident serves as a reminder of the ongoing efforts within the judicial system to adapt to modern communication methods, ultimately benefiting the community by making legal processes more inclusive.

The meeting concluded with a focus on maintaining open lines of communication and ensuring that all parties can effectively participate in future hearings, reflecting a broader commitment to improving the legal experience for residents in Michigan.