Commissioners discuss landscaping solutions amid concerns over new building at Terrace Way

The Planning Commission of Lafayette convened on April 22, 2025, to discuss several key issues regarding a proposed development project at 3572 Terrace Way. The meeting focused on landscaping concerns, changes to garage access, and public feedback from nearby residents.

The session began with a discussion on landscaping, where a commissioner emphasized the importance of collaborating with neighboring property owners to mitigate visual impacts. The developer was encouraged to consider feedback from residents on landscaping choices that could help obscure views of the new building.

Next, the commission addressed changes to the garage entrance, which were made in response to objections from a neighboring property owner. The developer explained that the new design aimed to reduce light pollution into adjacent apartments while adhering to existing easement requirements. Concerns were raised about pedestrian safety in the garage area, with suggestions for improved signage and pathways to ensure safe access for residents.

Public comments were then opened, with Anthony Lombardo, a resident of the adjacent property, expressing significant concerns about the proposed building's impact on quality of life. He highlighted issues such as the potential obstruction of views, loss of privacy, and increased noise from construction. Lombardo noted that residents had not received timely notifications about the project, which added to their frustration.

Lombardo further articulated that the proposed building would create a "50-foot wall" effect, drastically altering the landscape and diminishing property values for existing residents. He called for compensation for the anticipated loss of privacy and property value, emphasizing that the development would negatively affect the desirability of their units.

The meeting concluded with a commitment from the commission to consider the feedback provided by residents and to explore potential adjustments to the project that could address their concerns. The commission plans to continue discussions on the matter in future meetings, ensuring that community input remains a priority in the planning process.