DuPage County seeks outside review of jail policies after multiple inmate deaths

The DuPage County Board convened on April 22, 2025, to address pressing issues surrounding the county jail, particularly concerning the treatment of detainees and recent incidents that have raised concerns about the facility's operations. The meeting featured a robust discussion on the need for an external review of the sheriff's office policies and procedures, prompted by reports of deaths and inadequate medical care within the jail.

The meeting began with a member expressing the urgent need for accountability, citing that individuals have died in custody due to a lack of prescribed medication. This member advocated for an independent review to ensure transparency and improve the treatment of detainees, arguing that such an investment could potentially save taxpayers from costly lawsuits related to tort liability.

In response, another board member defended the sheriff's office, highlighting its overall effectiveness compared to larger counties like Cook County. They acknowledged the unfortunate incidents but emphasized that these should not overshadow the commendable work done by the sheriff's staff. The discussion revealed a divide among board members regarding the severity of the issues at the jail, with some insisting that the situation warranted an independent review while others believed it was an isolated incident.

Further contributions from board members underscored the complexity of the situation. One member pointed out that there have been multiple cases of neglect and inappropriate conduct within the jail, reinforcing the call for an external review. Another member raised logistical concerns about the board's authority to conduct such a review, noting that the sheriff's office operates independently and is subject to oversight by the Illinois Department of Corrections.

The conversation also touched on the accreditation process for the jail, with members discussing the importance of external evaluations by recognized agencies. It was noted that the sheriff's office had recently passed its accreditation reviews, suggesting that the facility meets established standards.

As the meeting progressed, members debated the appropriateness of discussing these issues at this time, given that a related lawsuit is still pending. Some argued that it was crucial to address these concerns now to prevent future tragedies, while others felt that the timing of the discussion was questionable.

In conclusion, the DuPage County Board's meeting highlighted significant concerns regarding the treatment of detainees in the county jail and the need for accountability and transparency. The discussions revealed differing perspectives on the necessity and feasibility of an external review, reflecting the complexities of governance and oversight in the context of public safety and legal liability. The board's next steps remain to be determined as they navigate these pressing issues.