On April 22, 2025, Alabama's Senate introduced Senate Bill 339, a legislative proposal aimed at adjusting the compensation structure for the Sheriff of Madison County. The bill outlines specific salary increases for the sheriff, effective June 1, 2025, and establishes clear parameters regarding additional compensation.
The primary provision of SB339 stipulates that the current sheriff, as of the effective date, will see an increase in annual salary from $154,086.40 to $170,000. Furthermore, should the sheriff be re-elected for a second consecutive term, a 7.5 percent salary increase will be applied, raising the annual compensation to $182,750. The bill also specifies that any future salary increases for successive terms will follow the same 7.5 percent increment, effective at the start of the new term. Notably, the bill restricts the sheriff from receiving any cost-of-living adjustments or additional monetary compensation beyond the outlined salary and reimbursements for itemized expenses.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free The introduction of SB339 has sparked discussions among lawmakers and constituents regarding the appropriateness of the proposed salary increases, particularly in the context of public service compensation. Critics argue that the increases may not align with the economic realities faced by taxpayers, while supporters contend that the adjustments are necessary to attract and retain qualified candidates for the sheriff's position.
As the bill progresses through the legislative process, its implications could extend beyond Madison County, potentially influencing compensation discussions for law enforcement officials statewide. The bill's passage may set a precedent for how salaries are structured for elected officials in Alabama, raising questions about equity and fiscal responsibility in public service compensation.
Senate Bill 339 is scheduled for further review in upcoming legislative sessions, where it will likely face additional scrutiny and debate before any final decisions are made.