Montana Senate Bill 101 targets unlawful squatting and fraudulent property sales

Montana's Senate Bill 101 is making waves as it seeks to tackle the growing issue of squatting in the state. Introduced on April 17, 2025, by Senators B. Beard and M. Vinton, the bill aims to establish clear legal definitions and consequences for unlawful squatting and fraudulent property transactions.

At the heart of Senate Bill 101 is the creation of the offense of unlawful squatting, which would allow property owners to take legal action against individuals occupying their properties without permission. The bill also introduces penalties for those who engage in fraudulent sales or leases of property, addressing a critical gap in current laws that has left many property owners vulnerable.

One of the bill's key provisions is the establishment of a streamlined process for law enforcement to remove squatters from properties, which proponents argue will provide much-needed clarity and efficiency in addressing these situations. Additionally, the bill allows law enforcement agencies to charge a fee for their services in these removals, a move that has sparked some debate among lawmakers about the potential financial burden on local governments.

Critics of the bill have raised concerns about the implications for individuals who may be wrongfully removed from properties, emphasizing the need for safeguards to protect vulnerable populations. To address these concerns, the bill includes provisions for a civil cause of action for wrongful removal, ensuring that individuals have recourse if they believe they have been unjustly displaced.

The economic implications of Senate Bill 101 are significant, as it aims to protect property rights and reduce the risks associated with squatting, which can lead to property devaluation and increased costs for owners. As the bill moves through the legislative process, its supporters argue that it will create a more stable environment for property ownership in Montana.

As discussions continue, the outcome of Senate Bill 101 could set a precedent for how squatting and property rights are handled in the state, with potential ripple effects on housing policies and law enforcement practices. The bill's fate remains uncertain, but its introduction has certainly ignited a crucial conversation about property rights and the responsibilities of both owners and occupants.