House Bill 916, introduced in Massachusetts on April 23, 2025, aims to significantly reduce the environmental impact of single-use plastics by restricting the sale of bottled water in plastic containers. The bill defines "bottled water" as non-sparkling, unflavored drinking water and prohibits retailers from selling or distributing it in single-serve plastic containers. Exceptions are made for nutritive drinks, tea, coffee, and unflavored carbonated water.
One of the key provisions of the bill includes a clause that allows for the sale of bottled water during emergencies declared by local, state, or federal officials, ensuring that residents have access to safe drinking water when necessary. This exemption lasts until seven days after the emergency declaration ends.
The bill also addresses the issue of black plastic pollution by proposing amendments to the General Laws, which would introduce a new chapter focused on the regulation of disposable food service ware. This chapter aims to prevent the release of black plastic into the environment, further emphasizing the state's commitment to reducing plastic waste.
Debate surrounding House Bill 916 has centered on its potential economic implications for retailers and the bottled water industry. Supporters argue that the bill is a crucial step toward environmental sustainability and reducing plastic pollution, while opponents express concerns about the impact on businesses that rely on bottled water sales.
Experts suggest that if passed, the bill could set a precedent for other states to follow, potentially leading to broader legislative efforts aimed at combating plastic waste. The bill is expected to take effect one year after its passage, giving retailers time to adjust to the new regulations.
As Massachusetts continues to grapple with environmental challenges, House Bill 916 represents a significant legislative effort to address the growing concerns over plastic pollution and its impact on public health and the environment. The outcome of this bill could have lasting effects on both the state's economy and its ecological footprint.