Edmonds residents demand interim tree ordinance after controversial coastal redwood removal

During the Edmonds City Council meeting on April 21, 2025, residents voiced significant concerns regarding transparency and communication in city planning processes, particularly in relation to tree removal and potential development projects.

One resident, Kat David Christy, highlighted the contentious removal of a coastal redwood tree known as Big Red, which had sparked public outcry due to perceived lack of community involvement. Christy urged the council to adopt an interim tree ordinance to prevent similar situations in the future, emphasizing that the removal process had been marred by misleading information and procedural issues. She pointed out that the city had defended the removal based on a lawfully granted permit, despite evidence suggesting that the application process was flawed and that community input had been disregarded.

Another resident, Kat Woodham, expressed her frustration over the public's perception of city communications. Woodham noted that many residents felt confused and distrustful following a recent meeting where they believed their local park and community center were at risk of being rezoned. Although the mayor clarified that the public had not been misinformed, Woodham argued that the widespread misunderstanding indicated a failure in the city’s communication strategy. She stressed the importance of clear and transparent dialogue between the city and its residents to rebuild trust.

The discussions at the meeting underscored a growing demand for improved public engagement in city decisions, particularly those affecting community assets and natural resources. As residents continue to seek clarity and accountability from their local government, the council faces the challenge of addressing these concerns while fostering a more inclusive decision-making process.