[{"_1":2,"_111":-5,"_112":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87,99],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6265533,"mediaKeyId","3090786-83aa7bbfd050169c9a11d87a39e5405b","parentId",3090786,"title","Board approves three procurement awards, including $50M temporary employment contract and $6.5M biosolids hauling agreement","audioSeconds",70,"startMs",830000,"endMs",900000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=3090786-83aa7bbfd050169c9a11d87a39e5405b&start=830&end=900","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3090786-83aa7bbfd050169c9a11d87a39e5405b/thumbnail_830000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6265533/Martin-County/Florida/Board-approves-three-procurement-awards-including-50M-temporary-employment-contract-and-65M-biosolids-hauling-agreement","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6265533-4b1197e204304a883c8a4e5a83336cac/orig.mp4?Expires=1770928272&Signature=VnB0ACUec3AGdPLdRuPeHrFiPllLmLkItcxiWUUaH0iSVmaiOzLwC9snhjN8NT4RAhhTt6S4bsGSRcR2PQeamdp~sFFxbdfV8~oNAw5iMCL9wnQ8NCCus5ZpqGcMTUFjnyM6J6nYRLlBsidy0QQXu6r1OdjEuwFCgYGhIL3IjHwhwwX7dz0Dc4XjvkRI7c7DPVNeVJznXoHFnFju4RIAB8SbpmvBBkqdBJkDsknvVbo9hcJ3ZPx1bgNSfwUsR5B6HREZYIUSrf05EagVmSxzfUssPa~oiZ7xJ66~yMD73pHjnFVo-rz35Os15cp~0Oq5BTfO9wOwmvYRvvZs82H5Ww__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Martin County, FL","date","2025-04-23T08:26:50.767Z","article","Martin County commissioners approved several procurement items on April 22, including two continuing services agreements and a biosolids hauling and disposal contract, and confirmed earlier staff recommendations for a House of Refuge restoration contract.

Christy Brotherton, the county\u0000chief procurement officer, presented three items. For continuing services, staff recommended awarding a temporary employment services agreement to the highest-scoring proposer, Resource Government Services, with a maximum not-to-exceed value of $50,000,000 and a maximum term of nine years (three-year initial term plus two three-year renewals). Brotherton told the board the scope would allow the county to secure temporary staffing as needed for operations.

Also before the board was a continuing services agreement for biosolids, dewatered sludge hauling and disposal. Brotherton said the contract had a maximum-not-to-exceed value of $6,500,000 with a maximum five-year term and staff recommended awarding to Appalachian Material Services, Inc. She explained the lowest bid on the haul-and-disposal solicitation had been disqualified as non-responsive because it contained alternate contingencies and duplicate bids, leaving Appalachian Material Services as the lowest responsive and responsible bidder.

All three items (the two continuing-services agreements and remaining grouped awards not separated out at the start of the meeting) were included in a single motion after commissioners chose not to separate items 2 and 3 from the consent batch. The board voted to approve the remaining items unanimously.

Votes at a glance:
- Continuing services agreement (temporary employment services): awarded to Resource Government Services; contract NTE $50,000,000; term 3 years with two 3-year renewals; outcome: approved unanimously.
- Continuing services agreement (biosolids hauling and disposal): awarded to Appalachian Material Services, Inc.; contract NTE $6,500,000; term 5 years; outcome: approved unanimously.

Staff noted the biosolids hauling contract is scoped to allow future changes in biosolids processing; growth-management and utility staff said an ongoing solicitation for different residuals processing is separate and that the hauling contract will support the existing disposal operation and accommodate any future transitions.

The board also confirmed approval of the House of Refuge contract and CIP funding in a separate action (see related article).","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Martin County Board of Commissioners Meeting - Afternoon - April 22, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","Martin County approved multiple procurement actions April 22, including a $50 million continuing services agreement for temporary staffing and a $6.5 million, five-year contract for hauling and disposal of biosolids.","taxTitle","Martin County, Florida","taxId",12775,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6265540,"Martin County approves $1.79 million award, funds restoration of House of Refuge despite some commissioners' reservations",18325,800000,19125000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3090786-83aa7bbfd050169c9a11d87a39e5405b&start=800&end=19125","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3090786-83aa7bbfd050169c9a11d87a39e5405b/thumbnail_800000.jpg","/articles/6265540/Martin-County/Florida/Martin-County-approves-179-million-award-funds-restoration-of-House-of-Refuge-despite-some-commissioners-reservations","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6265540-39bd98b66ec4a997edfbbed7c1d48012/orig.mp4?Expires=1770928272&Signature=iSKHPSUlWDTHTaniPD8oDYJgTcEjmnZIcbm92nIuoLjwZqcOns7nStMYc7qxwbxcXwljmIY6TLSDbqWMYyKtQuNmMn3CbOdbNXKdlTRJpSyrkGR812XoiGkU0dHTtnt5S8ElX6bbCSzW7hIUeD-USRteurVLLgF-WXQP52fraD1o24kfz1DIiXKPzPhoLtHb7J2OKn0VZnRz7SCZ5rSW1vIvRkrEF7f64GgebwuPzhEXvB9V8NsD5xbuA3pBLZcsh1cVTVrTnYJG9eCv0uFdyU9Ymsgxkj~9p2A9IOy-UFMTIKRTzHVeRjzcZgo37QxUF5A4eJuUm46n1b73OMUMog__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Martin County commissioners voted 3\u0000to\u00002 on April 22 to accept staff\u0000recommendations and fund a major restoration project for the House of Refuge, approving award of a $1,792,011 contract to the Tradesman Group and directing county staff to execute related documents.

The vote follows a presentation from Christy Brotherton, chief procurement officer, and Sean Donahue, general services director, who described the project and the recommended sole responsive proposer. \"Staff is recommending that the board award the contract to the sole responsive and responsible proposer, which is the tradesman group, in the amount of $1,792,011,\" Brotherton told commissioners.

The County\u0000Historic House is managed on a day\u0000to\u0000day basis by the Historical Society of Martin County under a longstanding partnership with the county. Catherine Larson, who identified herself as \"keeper of the house,\" told the board the structure is vulnerable and needs immediate work. \"She's a little old lady with her stockings falling down and she needs some help,\" Larson said, urging prompt action. Rob Steele, president and CEO of the Historical Society of Martin County, said the Society has managed the building for seven decades and intends to help fund and support the project. \"We will partner with the county as we have for 70 years,\" Steele said.

Commissioners split along budget and prioritization lines during their debate. Chair Heather Hurd emphasized the house\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000heritage value and moved to accept staff\u0000recommendation; Commissioner Hetherington seconded. Commissioner Vargas pressed for additional documentation, fundraising plans and the nonprofit\u0000status of the Historical Society before committing county funds, saying she could not support the large request without more specificity on fundraising and phasing. Commissioners Joseph Capps and Tim Campey (senior commissioners) supported the restoration, citing long\u0000term cultural and tourist value.

Brotherton told the board the county had previously secured a $231,000 grant in 2023 for roof work and that the project as proposed adheres to historic restoration standards needed to retain grant eligibility. Sean Donahue and representatives from REG Architects also explained that preserving the house\u0000in\u0000kind materials can be more costly but is required to maintain historic designation and access to certain grants.

The motion to accept staff\u0000recommendation and fund the project passed 3\u0000to\u00002. The board recorded the tally as yes 3, no 2; Commissioner Vargas was named among the dissenting votes; the second \"no\" was recorded without a named vote in the transcript.

The board authorized the county administrator or designee to execute all documents related to the contract award and the revised capital improvement plan sheet to fund the project. No construction schedule or final effective date for the restoration was set at the meeting.","The Board of County Commissioners voted 3–2 to accept staff\u0000recommendation to fund and award a $1,792,011 contract for the House of Refuge historic restoration after public testimony from the Historical Society and site volunteers.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6265525,"Board tentatively approves FY26 CIP; debate centers on House of Refuge, fire station funding and parks master-plan timing",2279,9146000,11425000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3090786-83aa7bbfd050169c9a11d87a39e5405b&start=9146&end=11425","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3090786-83aa7bbfd050169c9a11d87a39e5405b/thumbnail_9146000.jpg","/articles/6265525/Martin-County/Florida/Board-tentatively-approves-FY26-CIP-debate-centers-on-House-of-Refuge-fire-station-funding-and-parks-master-plan-timing","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6265525-28014b29268c76237253f349558cd925/orig.mp4?Expires=1770928272&Signature=IL~EU2krvoQQ~LFOdMkdOXTuGcqmLySrdZgtgNgkTJYiG~eyJTngYW3nJWaZdIdhw2uCxTpCgeYFbn-UJS47ndTUSO~HrdpCn9JexehQAWN6KW7viLjIDXiU-VUOZ3rbtL-4iAQv7AzjDVrQjoDggwm1m18~~TyRIewPKfeHyRZc7iIySo71tvqXpidE1tcCx74zZ4CtfwvEGhD1zIbeeCQtB8XOdxHzCyBntKrkHPNsCCFk9z7XDz9Ip30SCF~E1GdLo9w6hyccDJrzOGhl-89nfOBeO27YnKc-aWfGi9J2buy9nyk5cF16pX5qMrpINC8TCRLedBfBONRu-W5ExA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","At a lengthy workshop on April 22, the Martin County Board of County Commissioners tentatively approved the fiscal year 2026 capital improvement plan (CIP) as the basis for the tentative annual budget, while signaling there will be further review during the budget process. The workshop reviewed departmental capital requests, fixed-asset replacement budgets, and a 10-year plan. The board gave tentative approval to most departmental CIP sheets while several items prompted close debate and recorded dissents.

Shelby Baker, budget/CIP coordinator, summarized the countywide CIP and said the plan identifies projects for the subsequent 10-year period and that projects in year one will be included in the tentative FY26 budget. The countywide CIP presentation noted an approximately $5.1 million ad-valorem increase in the FY26 CIP overall compared with FY25 and described high-priority projects across departments including parks, utilities, stormwater, public buildings and public safety.

Key debates and votes during the workshop:

- House of Refuge funding and contract: A separate board action (see House of Refuge article) and public comments from the Historical Society and volunteers preceded the CIP discussion. Several commissioners supported allocating funds in the CIP to preserve the landmark; others sought better documentation and fundraising plans before committing county ad-valorem dollars.

- Fire rescue and logistics funding: The Martin County Sheriff\u0000s Office and Fire Rescue presented needs including a priority \"fuel depot\" replacement, proposed firearms training/shoot-house and a logistics center to replace aging storage and workshop facilities. Commissioners recorded a 4\u0000to\u00001 tentative approval for law enforcement facilities and equipment with Commissioner Vargas dissenting. The dissent related to prioritization and expenditure at a time of competing needs.

- Parks and recreation: The board tentatively approved parks CIP sheets overall, but Commissioner Heather Hetherington voted no on the parks package because she objected to a specific new Pineapple Park pickleball-complex master-plan allocation being included before the county had adopted a department master plan. Commissioners agreed to bring a formal parks master plan for adoption later and to revisit the timing of specific new facilities.

- Public buildings and House of Refuge: The public buildings CIP passed but drew dissent from Commissioner Vargas, who argued for stricter budget scrutiny and questioned some reallocation of FARB monies into projects such as the Jensen Beach café and restrooms that had experienced a fire.

- Western Palm City fire station debate: Several residents and commissioners emphasized a need for better emergency response coverage in western Palm City; commissioners differed on whether proposed new stations are primarily a consequence of past growth decisions or a pressing safety need. The board did not finalize station construction authorization at this meeting but directed staff to continue planning and prioritize projects where required.

The board took separate tentative approvals on departmental CIP sections (airport, libraries, law enforcement, public buildings, parks, public works sections, utilities, solid waste, etc.). Most passed by unanimous or large-majority consent; where dissenting votes were recorded they were captured in the departmental roll calls (for example: law enforcement CIP passed 4\u0000to\u00001 with Commissioner Vargas dissenting; parks CIP passed 4\u0000to\u00001 with Commissioner Hetherington dissenting; public buildings passed 3\u0000to\u00002 with Vargas dissenting).

Baker and department heads reminded commissioners that the FY26 CIP is a planning and budgeting input and that final project funding and schedules will be refined in July and September budget hearings. Several commissioners asked for more information on FARB methodologies and suggested staff compile asset-level life-cycle data for future budget work.","During a multi-hour capital improvement plan workshop, commissioners tentatively approved the FY26 CIP (first-year projects) after extensive presentations from departments. The session included votes to tentatively adopt department CIP sheets and several recorded dissenting votes over priorities and timing.",{"_33":100,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":101,"_41":102,"_43":103,"_45":104,"_47":105,"_49":106,"_51":107,"_53":108,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":109,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":110,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6265528,"Commission rejects proposed changes to CRA alternative-compliance process; board declines to adopt amendment to Article 12",2574,3460000,6034000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3090786-83aa7bbfd050169c9a11d87a39e5405b&start=3460&end=6034","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3090786-83aa7bbfd050169c9a11d87a39e5405b/thumbnail_3460000.jpg","/articles/6265528/Martin-County/Florida/Commission-rejects-proposed-changes-to-CRA-alternative-compliance-process-board-declines-to-adopt-amendment-to-Article-12","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6265528-4c1f25dda75cb13e16fd6286956a9ab9/orig.mp4?Expires=1770928272&Signature=lzG2kVIIWiTaEhOP8TClduBknWzbuj95NXUucoB2086AzAf5D5fql7~RQsJLnVpLfYlHwSlnw87ec1fbtdAFWiCm6f9nm6IiQsghVwTmr~E8tPyIl3WJDwcmMILzqc0hoBHC6AvgMQ~yeW26dRVoHCwXITTyhlsXFNbwSHIVGx1DPSb69IV7PPwHX~81J5ifUGjDjWleyXlooYtOVSp37oGhJMLJPRPsuqNZqsyB8cC4UgEvxSFcYMu76EzSiBsal7RBTHSPaRqwLYSSH7ZBZaxpE2kRqta~apmFJgTQo3You3OR0nFj7k2a05tIYfgRKwIP9ou3O70QwZRZnLeX7g__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Board of County Commissioners voted on April 22 to deny a proposed ordinance amendment that would revise Article 12 of the Land Development Regulations governing alternative compliance requests in Community Redevelopment Areas (CRAs). The rejection followed hearings before staff, the CRA board and public commenters and a divided public debate over notice, technical standards and which advisory bodies should decide requests.

Deputy County Attorney Elise Elder and Susan Korras, manager of the CRA program in Growth Management, presented the ordinance change. Their proposal would have replaced the current administrative alternative-compliance review (handled by the growth management director) with a public hearing process for many requests, sent some matters to the CRA board and adopted variance-style criteria mirroring Florida law for architectural and dimensional requests. Korras said the change was intended to increase transparency and to align CRA alternative compliance criteria with the rest of the county.

Tammy Mazzotta, a public commenter and NAC participant, urged the board to retain neighborhood advisory committee (NAC) involvement, saying the proposed language \"effectively removes the neighborhood advisory committees from the process of approving alternative compliance\" and criticized a lack of prior notice to NACs. Several commissioners raised questions about frequency and complexity of alternative compliance requests and whether volunteer NAC members would have the technical training to adjudicate complex, quasi-judicial questions.

Commissioners debated timing and process. Growth management director Paul Schilling said the change would introduce a public decision element for requests that are today decided administratively by staff, and cautioned the board that adding public hearings could delay routine building-permit-related alternative-compliance decisions by weeks or months. Commissioner concerns included (a) infrequency of applications (staff cited roughly six minor site-plan alternative-compliance requests in 2023 and 27 building-permit level items in 2024), (b) difficulty of NACs meeting cadence (NACs meet every other month), and (c) whether the CRA board had sufficient technical expertise.

After an extended exchange, County legal advised that, because a prior motion on the amendment had failed to receive a second, the board should move to deny transmittal. The board then voted on a motion \"not to approve\" the transmittal of the Article 12 amendment. The motion to deny carried 3\u0000to\u00001 (Commissioner Campey dissented, Commissioner Vargas was absent), and the proposed changes will not be forwarded to state reviewing agencies for transmittal.

The transcript shows public input both supporting more transparency and urging retention of NAC involvement. Staff said they will continue using the current process, which gives the growth management director the authority to approve certain alternative-compliance applications while allowing staff discretion to refer matters to public advisory bodies when appropriate.","After a contested public hearing and debate about neighborhood advisory committee roles and public notice, the Board of County Commissioners voted to not approve an amendment that would change alternative compliance review in Community Redevelopment Areas (CRAs) and adopt variance-like criteria under Florida law.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Board approves three procurement awards, including $50M temporary employment contract and $6.5M biosolids hauling agreement

Martin County approves $1.79 million award, funds restoration of House of Refuge despite some commissioners' reservations

Board tentatively approves FY26 CIP; debate centers on House of Refuge, fire station funding and parks master-plan timing

Commission rejects proposed changes to CRA alternative-compliance process; board declines to adopt amendment to Article 12