[{"_1":2,"_115":-5,"_116":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,85,95,105],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":-5,"_54":55,"_56":57,"_58":59,"_60":61,"_62":63,"_64":65,"_66":67,"_68":69,"_70":71,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6581475,"mediaKeyId","3116826-2ebdac20f975e3632ff5372860903ba2","parentId",3116826,"title","Property owner disputes county GIS road designations; commissioners direct research","audioSeconds",580,"startMs",360000,"endMs",940000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=3116826-2ebdac20f975e3632ff5372860903ba2&start=360&end=940","thumbnailUrl","https://d352y6ypj4mjo3.cloudfront.net/AudioPlaceholder.png","articleUrl","/articles/6581475/Utah/Property-owner-disputes-county-GIS-road-designations-commissioners-direct-research","mediaUrl","author","Daggett County Commission","date","2025-04-22T09:00:00Z","article","A property owner raised a detailed complaint that two lines shown as county roads in the county GIS actually represent informal two-track paths across private land and are not established county roads or recorded easements. The owner said visitors and third parties are using the GIS designation as evidence of public access, creating trespass problems.

Commissioners replied that the ruling document is the adopted county road map and recorded easements (plats, mylars and deeds). Staff said the first step is due diligence: compare the GIS layer to the official county road map and recorded plats; consult recorded easements and the RS 2477 registry where applicable; and, if the GIS lines are erroneous, coordinate with GIS staff (Cordell) to remove or relabel them. County staff also noted the county is undertaking a GIS update over the next six months.

Commissioners asked staff to: (1) meet with the road department (Sean) and GIS staff (Cordell) to research the origin of the GIS lines; (2) check whether the lines are recorded on plats or easements and whether RS 2477 historic rights-of-way might apply; (3) remove or relabel any lines that are mere features rather than designated county roads; and (4) report back on findings so property owners can be advised and potential trespass issues prevented.

The commission emphasized they will not instruct removal without due diligence. If the features are on a recorded plat as dedicated roads, a formal vacation process may be required; if not, a simple GIS correction is possible. Several commissioners offered to join staff to review documents in person.

Ending: Staff will meet with Sean and Cordell, examine the county road map, plats, deeds, and RS 2477 records, and return with recommendations for correcting the GIS and options for vacating recorded roads if needed.","mediaType","Audio","parentTitle","Daggett County Commission Meeting - April 22 2025 Commission Mtg Audio 2 Of 3","oneSentenceSummary","A property owner told the Daggett County Commission that two lines labeled \"county roads\" on the county GIS cross private property but do not reflect dedicated or recorded county roads; commissioners directed staff to research and correct the GIS mapping.","taxTitle","Daggett County Commission, Daggett County Commission and Boards, Daggett County, Utah","taxId",74902,"location","Utah","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":50,"_51":82,"_53":-5,"_54":55,"_56":57,"_58":83,"_60":61,"_62":63,"_64":84,"_66":67,"_68":69,"_70":71,"_72":73,"_74":73},6581478,"Commission approves on-call pay policy for deputies; Sweetwater MOU still pending",383,5472000,5855000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3116826-2ebdac20f975e3632ff5372860903ba2&start=5472&end=5855","/articles/6581478/Utah/Commission-approves-on-call-pay-policy-for-deputies-Sweetwater-MOU-still-pending","The Daggett County Commission approved a revised on-call pay policy for sheriff’s deputies, with staff estimating an annual payroll increase in the $7,000–$7,500 range that the county budget will sustain. Commissioners agreed to a final edit: deleting a problematic sentence in section 17.10.3 (the line that referenced ensuring 24-hour coverage in an unclear way).

Sheriff’s staff explained the policy clarifies how deputies record on-call hours and trade days to ensure coverage and limit liability. Commissioners asked whether vehicle and tool access rules and mutual-aid implications were addressed; staff said vehicle/tool use and scheduling mechanics (swapping days or trading shifts) are built into the policy. The board recorded that the MOU with Sweetwater County (mutual aid and on-call arrangements) remained a draft; staff expected a cleaned-up mutual-aid agreement to be ready for signature after Sweetwater’s internal review and governor’s office routing.

The commission moved and seconded a motion to approve the on-call policy with the deletion of the first paragraph in 17.10.3; the motion passed. Commissioners directed the sheriff’s office and county staff to finalize the mutual-aid MOU with Sweetwater County and return it for signature.

Ending: The on-call pay policy is approved; the mutual-aid MOU will be finalized and brought back for signature once Sweetwater completes its sign-offs.","The commission approved an on-call pay policy for deputies with a small annual estimated cost increase; the related memorandum of understanding (MOU) with Sweetwater County remains in draft and was not finalized at the meeting.",{"_33":86,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":87,"_41":88,"_43":89,"_45":90,"_47":91,"_49":50,"_51":92,"_53":-5,"_54":55,"_56":57,"_58":93,"_60":61,"_62":63,"_64":94,"_66":67,"_68":69,"_70":71,"_72":73,"_74":73},6581484,"Commission adopts revised land-use fee schedule after planning and zoning recommendation",1313,4147000,5460000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3116826-2ebdac20f975e3632ff5372860903ba2&start=4147&end=5460","/articles/6581484/Utah/Commission-adopts-revised-land-use-fee-schedule-after-planning-and-zoning-recommendation","The Daggett County Commission voted to adopt a revised land-use fee schedule recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Planning and Zoning presented two meetings of work that compared fees in nearby jurisdictions (examples cited: San Juan County, Uinta County, Beaver County) and concluded Daggett’s prior fees were typically lower than peers.

Planning and Zoning said the revised schedule more closely aligns fees with the time and staff resources required to process applications, and provides flexibility to account for inspector or contractor costs (plan reviews, building permits remain separate). Commissioners thanked the board for diligence and said the schedule is intended to improve transparency and ensure fees cover at least part of the county’s incremental review costs.

Commissioners asked clarifying questions about: whether fees would be applied as application charges (rezones, subdivision reviews), how fees relate to building permits and plan-review fees, and expected uses for collected fees (staff time, inspections, administrative costs). The board explained fees are designed to backfill the county workload tied to individual development requests rather than be a general tax.

The commission approved the new fee schedule as cited in the Planning & Zoning letter dated 04/15/2025 and directed staff to publish the schedule and supporting application checklists for applicants.

Ending: Staff will post the new fee schedule and work with Planning and Zoning to provide checklists and applicant guidance early in the application process.","Daggett County commissioners approved a new land-use fee schedule recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission following comparative research of neighboring counties and updated state subdivision rules.",{"_33":96,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":97,"_41":98,"_43":99,"_45":100,"_47":101,"_49":50,"_51":102,"_53":-5,"_54":55,"_56":57,"_58":103,"_60":61,"_62":63,"_64":104,"_66":67,"_68":69,"_70":71,"_72":73,"_74":73},6581488,"Daggett County approves $19,745 stage and small bleachers and $29,680 towable bleachers; debate centers on grant use",4645,1595000,6240000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3116826-2ebdac20f975e3632ff5372860903ba2&start=1595&end=6240","/articles/6581488/Utah/Daggett-County-approves-19745-stage-and-small-bleachers-and-29680-towable-bleachers-debate-centers-on-grant-use","The Daggett County Commission voted to approve two purchase requests: $19,745 for a portable modular stage and a 15-foot set of small portable bleachers and $29,680 for towable grandstands with a 107-seat capacity.

Supporters said the stage and smaller bleachers are modular and multiuse — suited for the new clinic conference room, rodeo grounds, park events and concerts — and argued purchase is the best use of remaining funds from a prior Governor's Office of Economic Opportunity (GoYO)/CEOAB grant that was partially reprioritized. Commissioner discussion noted the stage vendor was the lowest of three bids for the modular stage and that the rodeo grounds advisory board recommended the towable bleachers.

Opponents and some commissioners expressed concern that the purchases deviate from the grant’s original focus on permanent seating at the rodeo grounds and urged efforts to preserve the original seating priority. Commissioner comments focused on: (1) the risk of losing remaining grant funds if the county cannot deliver items within grant timeframes; (2) whether leftover line items from related projects (for example, welcome signs or park bathrooms) might be reallocated back to seating; and (3) the need for ADA-accessible seating at the arena, which the approved products do not provide.

The commission heard that CEOAB (the County economic-development advisory board) recommended using its allocation on portable seating and that James Dixon (GoYO) plans to meet with local CEOAB boards to review funding guidelines. Commissioners asked staff to pursue potential reallocation or additional grant funding and to explore donated or discounted concrete/work for an ADA-accessible platform the arena would need.

Votes and procurement details: the motion to approve the $19,745 purchase request (stage and small portable bleachers) passed after discussion; a separate motion to approve the towable bleachers, vendor contact Chris Ledford/Granite Industries, for $29,680 also passed. The commission asked staff to check remaining project line-item balances (welcome-signs budget, north park restroom variables) to identify any possible surplus that could be requested for seating/ADA work from the original grant funds.

County staff noted renting comparable stages repeatedly would exceed the one-time purchase cost, and rodeo and events stakeholders said the towable bleachers could be used across multiple county venues. Commissioners also requested the rodeo grounds advisory board and CEOAB monitor potential insurance and operational issues for borrowing/using stands outside county events.

The commission directed staff to: (1) follow up with CEOAB/GoYO about reallocation or new grant opportunities; (2) check budget line balances for possible surplus; and (3) pursue design and cost estimates for a simple ADA-access platform for the arena.

Ending: The purchases move forward with vendor agreements to be finalized; staff will return with any grant-reallocation options and cost estimates for ADA improvements.","The commission approved two purchase requests to buy a portable modular stage with small bleachers ($19,745) and towable grandstands ($29,680). Commissioners and advisory boards debated whether the purchases match the original CEOAB/GoYO grant purpose and whether remaining grant funds can be reallocated to ADA seating improvements.",{"_33":106,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":107,"_41":108,"_43":109,"_45":110,"_47":111,"_49":50,"_51":112,"_53":-5,"_54":55,"_56":57,"_58":113,"_60":61,"_62":63,"_64":114,"_66":67,"_68":69,"_70":71,"_72":73,"_74":73},6581470,"County counsel: amended complaint filed in condemnation case; affidavits for immediate occupancy being prepared",142,28000,170000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3116826-2ebdac20f975e3632ff5372860903ba2&start=28&end=170","/articles/6581470/Utah/County-counsel-amended-complaint-filed-in-condemnation-case-affidavits-for-immediate-occupancy-being-prepared","County counsel reported that in the ongoing condemnation action the county has filed an amended complaint and the opposing counsel stipulated to the amended order allowing the amendment. Counsel told commissioners they are waiting for the judge to sign the order; once the order is entered the county can file affidavits seeking immediate occupancy for two individuals named in the transcript (Trevor and Matt Lucas).

Counsel said there is no court date set yet; if the other side requests a hearing the county will schedule one. Counsel also noted one party (Mac) has mobilized construction activity to some degree and may be hesitant to proceed further until immediate occupancy is secured. The county plans to file two affidavits justifying immediate occupancy and then request immediate relief, and if an opponent asks for a hearing the county will respond by scheduling the hearing.

Commissioners heard that opposing counsel’s stipulation should eliminate the need for an initial hearing to amend the complaint, but the judge must sign the order before the county can proceed with occupancy filings.

Ending: Counsel will file affidavits for Trevor and Matt Lucas once the judge signs the amended order and will notify the commission if a hearing is requested by the other side.","County counsel reported an amended order and amended complaint are filed in an ongoing condemnation matter, opposing counsel stipulated to the amendment and staff are preparing affidavits to request immediate occupancy for two individuals once the judge signs the order.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Property owner disputes county GIS road designations; commissioners direct research

Commission approves on-call pay policy for deputies; Sweetwater MOU still pending

Commission adopts revised land-use fee schedule after planning and zoning recommendation

Daggett County approves $19,745 stage and small bleachers and $29,680 towable bleachers; debate centers on grant use

County counsel: amended complaint filed in condemnation case; affidavits for immediate occupancy being prepared