Nevada Assembly Bill 428 mandates fertility preservation coverage for cancer patients
April 24, 2025 | House Bills - Introduced, House Bills, 2025 House and Senate Bills, Nevada Legislation Bills, Nevada
This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »
Nevada's Assembly Bill 428 is making waves as it seeks to mandate health plans to cover fertility preservation services for individuals diagnosed with breast or ovarian cancer. Introduced on April 24, 2025, the bill aims to address a critical gap in healthcare coverage that affects many patients facing infertility due to cancer treatments.
The bill requires both public and private health insurance plans, including Medicaid and coverage for state and local government employees, to provide necessary procedures to preserve fertility for those whose cancer treatments may lead to infertility. This includes patients whose diagnosis or treatment could directly or indirectly impact their ability to conceive. Notably, the bill includes exceptions for insurers affiliated with religious organizations, which has sparked some debate among lawmakers and advocacy groups.
Supporters of AB 428 argue that it is essential for ensuring that cancer patients have the opportunity to preserve their reproductive options, a concern that resonates deeply with many families. "This bill is about giving hope and choices to those battling cancer," said Assemblymember Flanagan, one of the bill's sponsors. Critics, however, raise concerns about the potential financial implications for insurers and the state, as the bill contains an unfunded mandate that could strain resources.
The economic impact of AB 428 is still being assessed, but it is clear that the legislation could lead to increased healthcare costs for insurers, which may ultimately be passed on to consumers. As the bill moves through the legislative process, discussions around its fiscal implications and the ethical considerations of mandating coverage for fertility preservation will likely intensify.
As it stands, AB 428 represents a significant step toward comprehensive healthcare for cancer patients in Nevada, with the potential to reshape how fertility preservation is viewed and funded within the healthcare system. The bill's future remains uncertain, but its introduction has already ignited important conversations about reproductive rights and healthcare equity in the state.
The bill requires both public and private health insurance plans, including Medicaid and coverage for state and local government employees, to provide necessary procedures to preserve fertility for those whose cancer treatments may lead to infertility. This includes patients whose diagnosis or treatment could directly or indirectly impact their ability to conceive. Notably, the bill includes exceptions for insurers affiliated with religious organizations, which has sparked some debate among lawmakers and advocacy groups.
Supporters of AB 428 argue that it is essential for ensuring that cancer patients have the opportunity to preserve their reproductive options, a concern that resonates deeply with many families. "This bill is about giving hope and choices to those battling cancer," said Assemblymember Flanagan, one of the bill's sponsors. Critics, however, raise concerns about the potential financial implications for insurers and the state, as the bill contains an unfunded mandate that could strain resources.
The economic impact of AB 428 is still being assessed, but it is clear that the legislation could lead to increased healthcare costs for insurers, which may ultimately be passed on to consumers. As the bill moves through the legislative process, discussions around its fiscal implications and the ethical considerations of mandating coverage for fertility preservation will likely intensify.
As it stands, AB 428 represents a significant step toward comprehensive healthcare for cancer patients in Nevada, with the potential to reshape how fertility preservation is viewed and funded within the healthcare system. The bill's future remains uncertain, but its introduction has already ignited important conversations about reproductive rights and healthcare equity in the state.
View Bill
This article is based on a bill currently being presented in the state government—explore the full text of the bill for a deeper understanding and compare it to the constitution
View Bill