Oregon committee discusses wildfire funding and equity in House Bill 3940

During a recent meeting of the Oregon House Committee on Revenue, discussions centered on the pressing issue of wildfire costs and the financial responsibilities of forest landowners. The committee heard from Mike McCarthy, a member of a legislative advisory committee on fire suppression costs, who highlighted that Oregon forest landowners currently bear a disproportionate burden compared to their counterparts in 11 other western states. He emphasized the need for a fair and equitable system, referencing House Bill 3940, which aims to address these disparities.

McCarthy pointed out that forest landowners pay more than 1.5 times the taxes of similar business sectors, yet the bill does not eliminate the Oregon Forest Resource Enhancement (OFRE) program, which he appreciates. However, he expressed concerns that the bill favors one certification system over others, suggesting that the state should not endorse specific business models.

Ralph Bloomers, a wildfire expert with 25 years of experience, echoed these sentiments, noting the escalating costs associated with wildfire management, which reached nearly $350 million last year. He stressed the financial strain on landowners, including increased insurance premiums and assessments for fire protection. Bloomers also raised concerns about the financial contributions of Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) operating in Oregon, arguing they are not paying their fair share towards wildfire management costs.

Both speakers underscored the critical juncture Oregon faces in addressing wildfire funding and the need for a balanced approach that considers the contributions of all stakeholders. The discussions reflect a growing urgency to reform the financial structures surrounding wildfire management in the state, with potential implications for future legislation and funding strategies.