The City of Oldsmar Board of Adjustment convened on April 23, 2025, to discuss a variance request for a residential property located at 1763 Oak Pond Court. The applicant, Kimberly Roper, seeks approval to build a small pool and deck in her backyard, aiming to create a family-friendly outdoor space for her children. Roper emphasized her desire to maintain a close relationship with her ex-husband and provide a safe environment for her kids, particularly in light of her recent divorce.
During the meeting, Roper clarified that the proposed pool and deck would be at the same elevation as the existing concrete, addressing concerns about potential flooding. However, the discussion took a critical turn when Lindsay Lee, a neighbor, voiced significant objections to the variance. Lee raised alarms about the implications of increasing lot coverage in a designated flood hazard area, as identified by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free Lee highlighted that the proposed addition would exacerbate existing drainage issues in the East Lake Oaks neighborhood, where heavy rainfall often overwhelms the stormwater system. She pointed out that the area is prone to flooding, particularly during tropical storms, and expressed concern that the increase in impervious surfaces could worsen these conditions.
Moreover, Lee questioned the accuracy of the impervious surface ratio (ISR) calculations provided by the applicant's contractor, suggesting potential discrepancies that could misrepresent the actual impact of the proposed construction. She argued that the contractor's financial interest in the project could lead to biased reporting, raising doubts about the integrity of the variance request.
The Board of Adjustment did not reach a decision during this meeting, leaving the matter open for further consideration. The discussions underscored the delicate balance between individual property rights and community safety, particularly in areas vulnerable to flooding. As the board prepares for its next steps, the outcome of this variance request will be closely watched by residents concerned about the implications for local infrastructure and environmental safety.