[{"_1":2,"_99":-5,"_100":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6573052,"mediaKeyId","3119330-bc0378c04036e3b759c0ee00c546e5df","parentId",3119330,"title","Commission recommends approval of RM zoning and PRUD overlay for 16 East 950 North; 56 townhomes proposed","audioSeconds",4131,"startMs",5872000,"endMs",10003000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=3119330-bc0378c04036e3b759c0ee00c546e5df&start=5872&end=10003","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3119330-bc0378c04036e3b759c0ee00c546e5df/thumbnail_5872000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6573052/Kaysville/Davis-County/Utah/Commission-recommends-approval-of-RM-zoning-and-PRUD-overlay-for-16-East-950-North-56-townhomes-proposed","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6573052-84c1910cbc8444e56405852b58a725fd/orig.mp4?Expires=1771153376&Signature=CJLvEN3ntWCAiuIJeiG1uUDUoHe9aMovtXkKIP2zKts6Wp0sBU6ATnUzUkF2PCN5KKoZABYzsbpPBr6scVA71yVfsxQ1hkn6jTuWGIcZow53OS5PZJEUuGbXAV5DSiG3XMYXFY8~k9Phm2caQgFiI4h~ShWC0ntanM2JG5GfyASDGX-yT2XgW2h2iOxYsuWr3XqJRc~cEvxphAuw4ki6vXdL9s4su3xltnNloM8263uvGRSglbdP6sfO584BWx8fYDaRIENheKSQMPyIJ7-yWsOCmjQ~jRiw9j6xjdYJEuoVko4qzVguZTo4bNxDe8WdA0pQCuTdtLQG3J9a6xrPcw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Kaysville","date","2025-04-25T04:08:52.657Z","article","Kaysville planning staff recommended approval on April 20 of a rezone for 16 East 950 North from RA (agricultural residential) to RM (multiple-family residential) with a PRUD overlay. The applicant proposes 56 townhome units on approximately 3.77 acres, internal private lanes, rear-loading garages, and a package of common amenities.

Staff said the parcel is shown as general commercial on the city’s future land use map, but that state requirements and the city’s moderate-income housing plan direct staff to give strong consideration to rezonings that add housing types the city lacks. Mindy McNamara told commissioners the RM application responds to an objective in the 2022 general plan and the city’s moderate-income housing implementation measures.

The proposed site plan shows 56 units with two-car garages, room for two additional cars per driveway, and 12 guest parking stalls for a total of approximately 236 parking spaces; staff said the code-required minimum would be far lower. The developer proposes about 42,000 square feet of open space (staff calculated required open space at roughly 32,000 square feet). The applicant requested small modifications to setback standards and an additional three feet of building height (33 feet requested to allow a workable three-story form); staff said those standards could be set in a development agreement.

The application includes a package of on-site amenities the applicant described for residents: pergola seating, a small play area, a fenced dog run, a perimeter walking path and a small gathering/grill area. Staff recommended approval of the rezone with a PRUD overlay contingent on the development agreement and site-plan review.

Public commenters opposed the RM rezone for reasons similar to the earlier item: concerns about traffic and sight lines at the nearby interchange, the effect of three-story buildings adjacent to single-family yards, possible impacts on school crossings and pedestrian safety, and potential effects on neighborhood character and property values. Several commenters said they supported careful, lower-density alternatives such as single-family housing in that location.

Applicant Phil Holland said the project proposes about 14 units per acre (RM allows up to 16 units per acre), that the housing product is intended to provide housing options Kaysville currently lacks, and that the proposal includes parking and open-space levels above the code minimums. Holland said the site is adjacent to arterial roads and interchanges and that mixed-use commercial and residential nearby is consistent with the city’s long-term plans.

After discussion, a commissioner moved and the commission voted to recommend approval of the RA→RM rezoning with a PRUD overlay to the city council. Commissioners noted they expect additional engineering details at the subdivision stage and that the applicant and staff should coordinate on drainage, storm-water mitigation, and traffic access; the applicant said he preferred the RM item be scheduled to go to city council along with the LI item once the LI item returns to commission.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Planning Commission Meeting 04-24-2025","oneSentenceSummary","The planning commission recommended that the city council approve rezoning 16 East 950 North from agricultural (RA) to multiple-family residential (RM) with a PRUD overlay, supporting a proposed 56-unit townhome development with 42,000 square feet of open space, subject to development-agreement details.","taxTitle","Kaysville, Davis County, Utah","taxId",7302,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6573057,"Planning commission continues public hearing on rezone for 13 West 950 North (RA→LI) after extensive traffic and compatibility concerns",4305,872000,5177000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3119330-bc0378c04036e3b759c0ee00c546e5df&start=872&end=5177","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3119330-bc0378c04036e3b759c0ee00c546e5df/thumbnail_872000.jpg","/articles/6573057/Kaysville/Davis-County/Utah/Planning-commission-continues-public-hearing-on-rezone-for-13-West-950-North-RALI-after-extensive-traffic-and-compatibility-concerns","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6573057-3d04a141f8566eb014c695f90299083a/orig.mp4?Expires=1771153376&Signature=DuSNU4sV2J7ShZOyhxBtrvl5BVI-R4TVDFdItgOfWlkJgfu-LKV58wL6XXlJxAtee7jMj2ibUdZwGTZjPw0PqbjBMC5gt2lSKP693UJB6qhhJi4k2QwEIcIxm5nMF5JEh6uyeTkGRM2OMQPwNYfTcDX8Y1rXjWPSOYzXqF1gToVdVBGFxwy-lm9wjb2Xeh7ieTgR-VK7BAgCnkyNlrwyVnBQEy9Xe6bVtDK~ha8VZtd1ehM~vzlz2ynvv1rrg9uw~RTAgxm7RH8Ev68ad5XuG~UGx2gmZVNdKdrijKQTSpr90bvUpaveK31Fjns-loH8XMAfFoX-VSkzGWRbAM3Nzw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Kaysville planning staff presented an application from the Holland Group to rezone a 3.77-acre parcel at approximately 13 West 950 North from RA (agricultural residential) to LI (light industrial). Staff noted the parcel was previously owned by UDOT, is adjacent to planned interchange improvements on the West Davis Corridor, and that the future land use map shows a general-commercial designation rather than light industrial.

Staff recommended approval to the city council based on proximity to the West Davis Corridor and general-plan goals that encourage commercial uses near interchanges, but noted the future land use map’s color differentiation (general commercial vs. light industrial) and the limited explicit guidance on locating light industrial in the 2022 General Plan. The staff report said 94 mailed notices were sent within an 800-foot radius and that six public comments had been received opposing the rezone, primarily citing traffic and pedestrian-safety concerns near nearby elementary schools.

Applicant Phil Holland described flexible commercial uses he anticipates—“flex” office/retail or other small-scale commercial tenants—and said he had received offers for a convenience/gas use that would occupy one to two acres. Holland said the LI zoning provides a broader set of allowed uses that fit current market demand.

Residents at the public hearing voiced consistent concerns about traffic, pedestrian safety for children walking to Endeavor Elementary, visibility at the off-ramp intersection, future growth from adjacent planned subdivisions, stormwater and environmental impacts near a federal bird refuge, and potential effects on neighborhood character and property values. A school crossing guard, Shelley Moore, urged improved traffic control at the existing signal and crosswalks and said the current signal phasing was confusing for drivers.

Commissioners and staff engaged in an extended discussion about traffic analysis. Staff said a traffic impact analysis had been submitted and that the city’s public-works director and city engineer—and an outside reviewer, Hales Engineering—had reviewed the study; Hales Engineering had not completed its review of a second iteration submitted the prior week and staff expected final review prior to city council. Staff also noted jurisdictional complexity: portions of 950 North and the intersection are under Farmington City and UDOT control, which affects where traffic signal or mitigation authority resides.

Multiple commissioners said they were willing to consider LI but wanted more detail before making a recommendation to city council: a conceptual site layout showing the entire parcel (commercial plus the adjacent residential proposal), a finalized Hales Engineering review of the traffic analysis, options or limits that could be included in a development agreement to prohibit particular LI uses if desired, and clearer answers about ingress/egress alignment with existing roads (including whether an access would align with Dubai/Divai Drive).

After discussion, a commissioner moved to continue the rezone application to the next available meeting so the applicant could provide additional sketches and staff could complete outstanding technical reviews and clarify options for development-agreement restrictions. The commission voted to continue the item.","The commission continued a proposal by the Holland Group to rezone 13 West 950 North from agricultural to light industrial, requesting additional materials including a site layout, completed traffic review from Hales Engineering and clarity on development-agreement use restrictions before recommending action to city council.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6573060,"Planning commission approves home-occupation permit for Green Peak Landscaping at 133 South 500 East",761,64000,825000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3119330-bc0378c04036e3b759c0ee00c546e5df&start=64&end=825","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3119330-bc0378c04036e3b759c0ee00c546e5df/thumbnail_64000.jpg","/articles/6573060/Kaysville/Davis-County/Utah/Planning-commission-approves-home-occupation-permit-for-Green-Peak-Landscaping-at-133-South-500-East","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6573060-58bd562a5107cbed6d4c14098271f962/orig.mp4?Expires=1771153376&Signature=co8-UEcU~5ETwU2BYQJlaeD7r5IjGhJNdZI5ndcNNR6Rlsz9hquwBArllQmdlGbkeLvNlBCYD88KxFhxyeT8a2VcDG~nK04Om9Hd4B1Ge24mvWiMbzb3EB1YmEZVBbGQf8EhkvEQvjXXBwc299YQRPJL7atcW-s3CBBzNEcFYChRF3B6Rha4v9RkB~~W59dByqIYPsB6QlLU60WRygCL5E49beeQX2GrKEykHkU2~ok2bYM~4ODQP8wZX~25Nv4ybxPMMESb8Zv6v-Myplc~FlF~iCipDLb0lKUIQioeNFStzIyXutxa-nTybd2k7km6PAiMpYhdO8uMh4J7wwxD-Q__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Kaysville City Planning Commission on April 20 approved a conditional use permit for Green Peak Landscaping to operate as a major home-occupation at 133 South 500 East.

City planning staff presented the record and told the commission the business had been registered with the Utah Department of Commerce but did not hold a Department of Professional Licensing (DOPL) contractor’s license or a Kaysville business license at the time the matter came to staff attention. Mindy McNamara, planning staff, said the city notified the applicant and followed up after a code enforcement complaint; she told commissioners the city would not issue a business license until the applicant demonstrated compliance with DOPL licensing requirements.

“The city will not issue a business license without the license from DOPL as well as a conditional use permit,” McNamara said.

Applicant Jerram Jorgensen told the commission he parks one work truck at his residence and that the dirt visible on the sidewalk came from sprinkler trenching for yard work. “I think it was with my truck being parked out front,” Jorgensen said when asked whether a March complaint related to vehicle parking.

Neighbors had called the mayor and staff with questions about past parking and debris on the sidewalk, McNamara said; staff reported two phone calls requesting information and one text to the mayor. McNamara recommended approval of the conditional use permit for a “Major B” home occupation subject to the city’s standard findings and code requirements.

Commissioners discussed the timeline of enforcement and whether to add a motion condition requiring proof of DOPL compliance before the city business license is issued. Staff said the city’s existing practice is to withhold the business license until DOPL documentation is provided and that the commission could include that explicitly in a motion. Commissioners voted in favor and the motion passed.

McNamara said staff will finalize issuance of the conditional use permit and email the applicant a letter. She asked the applicant to notify staff once DOPL licensing is granted so the business license can be completed.

Why it matters: the decision allows a contractor-class home business to operate from a residence in Kaysville but preserves city and state licensing checks intended to ensure contractors meet required professional standards and public-safety rules.","Kaysville planning staff recommended and the commission approved a conditional use permit allowing a major home-occupation landscaping business at 133 South 500 East, contingent on state licensing and city business-license requirements.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Commission recommends approval of RM zoning and PRUD overlay for 16 East 950 North; 56 townhomes proposed

Planning commission continues public hearing on rezone for 13 West 950 North (RA→LI) after extensive traffic and compatibility concerns

Planning commission approves home-occupation permit for Green Peak Landscaping at 133 South 500 East