MSPS warns of risks with Michigan's proposed land division amendments

In a pivotal meeting held on March 13, 2025, the Michigan House of Representatives delved into the complexities of land division regulations, focusing on House Bill 4081. The bill proposes significant changes to the Land Division Act, which governs how parcels of land can be divided. As discussions unfolded, concerns emerged regarding the potential implications of these changes on property owners and municipalities alike.

The meeting highlighted the current limitations on parcel creation, which are designed to ensure proper oversight and consideration in land division. Proponents of the bill argue that existing methods, such as subdivision planning, are often too costly, prompting the need for a more accessible approach. However, critics, including representatives from the Michigan Society of Professional Surveyors (MSPS), raised alarms about the risks associated with expanding the allowable divisions from four to ten parcels without adequate safeguards.

One of the primary concerns voiced was the ambiguity in legal descriptions required for land divisions. The current application process only necessitates a tentative parcel map with vague dimensions, leaving room for significant errors. Surveyors pointed out that inconsistencies across municipalities can lead to approvals based on unclear descriptions, resulting in costly disputes over property boundaries once parcels are sold.

The historical context of land surveying in Michigan was also discussed, with references to the original surveys from the early 1800s that established the one-mile grid system. These early surveys lacked the precision of modern technology, leading to discrepancies that could complicate future land divisions. As the conversation progressed, it became clear that the proposed bill could exacerbate these issues, particularly as the number of parcels increases.

Moreover, the meeting touched on the importance of infrastructure planning, such as easements for utilities and roads, which are often overlooked in the land division process. Without these considerations, the potential for urban sprawl and infrastructure challenges looms large, raising questions about the long-term sustainability of Michigan's land use practices.

As the committee wrapped up, MSPS representatives urged lawmakers to prioritize accuracy and safety in any amendments to the Land Division Act. They emphasized that while simplifying the land division process is a worthy goal, it should not come at the expense of clarity and oversight that protect both property owners and the integrity of Michigan's land management practices.

The discussions from this meeting underscore a critical juncture for land regulation in Michigan, as lawmakers weigh the balance between accessibility and accountability in land division. As the bill moves forward, the implications for residents and local governments will be closely monitored, with many hoping for a resolution that safeguards the interests of all stakeholders involved.