City Council debates wetland mitigation plan for 42 North housing project

During the Ann Arbor City Council meeting on September 8, 2008, significant discussions centered around a proposed development project on a vacant lot owned by Grace Bible Church on South Maple Road. The lot, currently zoned for high-density multifamily housing, has raised concerns among council members regarding its environmental impact and compliance with city ordinances.

One of the primary issues discussed was the proposed wetland mitigation plan associated with the development. Council members expressed apprehension about the plan's adherence to local regulations, particularly the requirement for on-site mitigation of natural features. The site is notable for its ecological significance, being the highest point in the city and home to several endangered species and wetlands. Council Member Breer highlighted that the current site plan violates the city's mitigation language, which could jeopardize the health and safety of the community.

The council also debated the implications of the development's zoning classification. Council Member Rangland pointed out that the living arrangements proposed by the developer do not align with the city’s definition of a family, which could render the project non-compliant with existing zoning laws. This raised questions about the appropriateness of the project in the context of the community's needs and the city’s regulatory framework.

Despite the concerns, some council members, including Council Member Grady, argued in favor of the project, emphasizing that it met the necessary codes and regulations. Grady acknowledged the community's fears regarding the potential negative impacts of student housing but insisted that such concerns should not dictate the approval process. He noted that the market may not support the influx of high-density student housing, suggesting that speculative development could lead to future failures.

The meeting concluded with a divided council, as several members expressed their intent to vote against the project due to its perceived shortcomings in environmental stewardship and compliance with city ordinances. The discussions highlighted the ongoing tension between development interests and community preservation, as well as the complexities of navigating local regulations in the face of evolving urban needs.

As the council prepares for a vote on the proposal, the outcome remains uncertain, with significant implications for both the environment and the community's character. The council's decision will likely set a precedent for future developments in Ann Arbor, particularly those involving sensitive ecological areas.