[{"_1":2,"_99":-5,"_100":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6265088,"mediaKeyId","3095307-33f97feb44efce48ea30ac7efc9fbf4d","parentId",3095307,"title","Votes at a glance: Van Zandt County commissioners approve resolutions, bids, plats and administrative items","audioSeconds",3645,"startMs",1951820,"endMs",5597531,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=3095307-33f97feb44efce48ea30ac7efc9fbf4d&start=1951&end=5597","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3095307-33f97feb44efce48ea30ac7efc9fbf4d/thumbnail_1951820.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6265088/Van-Zandt-County/Texas/Votes-at-a-glance-Van-Zandt-County-commissioners-approve-resolutions-bids-plats-and-administrative-items","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6265088-a4b2650e1240340f0ff06a7f94a0d52c/orig.mp4?Expires=1773372519&Signature=gTOPaXAqm6C~JM8k0lVlCzMf3255h8eF8qmbH3CcC6x5YT~EfjZzZdJLuoGVan3TKGTMFbbPusKs-yBirF8DV~re4b6gipYw1EizgxDwmNhQaUfYDLH6aegVpQW9GmQn01qBbveOdiCON9cqiR5wK2fUvvURsxxWjCQqXMlk8FbgdrTaUa~OVIbq92-vu7nnfvco4eN41xfKJRfw8RENIw8aRSn-8XeNwa1jiQebVEsgdnUY9VqGijoi-327io9FaF-W2otm6PDV3EYCAPd1jD3CbYumuKoTa5aOSn~XK~upWpSnuBGkpc8kbboH3usO-iBY-S9fsom3s7S0SM2KEg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Van Zandt County TX","date","2025-04-23T16:03:52.757Z","article","The Van Zandt County Commissioners Court took votes on multiple agenda items, approving routine matters and several substantive decisions. Below is a concise summary of each action the court took during the meeting.

Votes at a glance
1) Item 4 — Consent agenda
Motion: Approve the consent agenda as presented.
Outcome: Approved (voice vote).

2) Item 5 — Withdraw prior awarding of hot mix road procedures (Option 3)
Motion: Withdraw the earlier award to Area Wide Paving after the bidder indicated it would modify prices; withdraw the awarding.
Outcome: Approved (motion to withdraw passed by voice vote).

3) Item 6 — Reaward road-and-bridge hot mix material bid (Option 3) for contract period 05/01/2025–04/30/2026
Motion: Reaward the contract to the next lowest bidder per the original bid documents (identified in the record as the next low bidder).
Outcome: Approved (voice vote).

4) Item 7 — Approve Dawson Creek Phase 1 subdivision plat (County Road 2115, Precinct 2)
Motion: Approve the plat; applicant complied with subdivision requirements.
Outcome: Approved (voice vote).

5) Item 8 — Vacate Fairview Estates subdivision plat (County Road 2621, Precinct 2)
Motion: Approve vacating Fairview Estates subdivision with exceptions for four existing lots and remove public dedications for roadways within the vacated area; new survey to be filed.
Outcome: Approved (voice vote).

6) Item 9 — Approve The Peg (Nepey Estates) lot 1 subdivision plat (County Road 4106, Precinct 4)
Motion: Approve 5.94-acre lot subdivision; applicant complied with requirements.
Outcome: Approved (voice vote).

7) Item 10 — Tabling: Request for proposals for engineering analysis services for the jail
Motion: Table the RFP and reissue as a Request for Qualifications because the RFP needed revision.
Outcome: Tabled (voice vote).

8) Item 11 — Authorize district attorney to spend up to $10,000 for civil litigation purposes
Motion: Allow DA to spend up to $10,000 from the legal account for civil litigation, expenditures to be ratified at future meetings.
Outcome: Approved (voice vote).

9) Item 12 — Resolution regarding financing approach for courthouse renovation (1930 North Trade Days Boulevard)
Motion: Adopt resolution stating that if a tax increase is necessary for renovation of county buildings, the court will propose a bond election rather than issue a certificate of obligation.
Outcome: Approved (voice vote).

10) Item 13 — Approve bond renewal for assistant county auditor (Lisa Hutchison) in amount of $5,000
Motion: Approve bond renewal.
Outcome: Approved (voice vote).

11) Item 14 — Road & Bridge Precinct 3: installation-only services for private driveway culverts on County Road 3504
Motion: Authorize installation-only services for culverts when property owners purchase culverts; county to install while reconstructing road.
Outcome: Approved (voice vote).

12) Item 15 — Six-month renewal concerning belly dump trailer lease from Brazos Trailers (Precinct 3)
Motion: Renew lease agreements for belly dump trailers with Brazos Trailers.
Outcome: Approved (voice vote).

13) Item 16 — Order authorizing Memorial Day fireworks sales period (05/21/2025–05/26/2025)
Motion: Approve the sales period authorized by state statute.
Outcome: Approved (voice vote).

Notes on voting and procedure
- Most items were approved by voice vote with commissioners saying \"Aye\"; the record indicates unanimous passage for the listed items. Where the transcript records a motion and a second and the clerk announced \"Motion passes,\" this summary records the result as approved. Where the transcript provided specific mover/second language, that text is recorded in the actions fields below.
- Item 10 (RFP for jail engineering analysis) was explicitly tabled and will be reissued as a Request for Qualifications.

Provenance (first and last transcript references for each action)
- Item 4 (consent agenda): topicintro 00:32:31.820 (\"We will now move on to item number 4, public comments...\"), topicfinish 00:33:19.395 (\"Motion passes.\")
- Item 5 (withdraw award): topicintro 00:33:17.395 (discussion of hot mix bid), topicfinish 00:35:46.520 (withdrawal vote passes).
- Item 6 (reaward): topicintro 00:35:54.520, topicfinish 00:36:42.270 (motion passes).
- Item 7 (Dawson Creek plat): topicintro 00:36:52.275, topicfinish 00:37:48.665 (motion passes).
- Item 8 (vacate Fairview Estates): topicintro 00:37:48.665, topicfinish 00:44:03.065 (motion passes after amendment and survey requirement).
- Item 9 (Nepey Estates): topicintro 00:44:03.065, topicfinish 00:45:12.39 (motion passes).
- Item 10 (jail RFQ table): topicintro 00:45:12.39, topicfinish 00:46:14.685 (motion to table passes).
- Item 11 (DA authority): topicintro 00:46:15.295, topicfinish 00:54:02.73 (motion to authorize spending passes).
- Item 12 (courthouse financing resolution): topicintro 00:54:14.345, topicfinish 00:58:40.090 (resolution adopted).
- Item 13 (bond renewal for auditor): topicintro 00:58:40.090, topicfinish 00:59:22.125 (motion passes).
- Item 14 (culvert installation): topicintro 00:59:22.825, topicfinish 01:00:44.25 (motion passes).
- Item 15 (belly dump trailer lease renewal): topicintro 01:00:44.25, topicfinish 01:01:44.745 (motion passes).
- Item 16 (fireworks sales order): topicintro 01:01:44.805, topicfinish 01:02:35.8647 (motion passes).

Actions (detailed entries)
[ {\"kind\":\"other\",\"identifiers\":{\"agenda_item_id\":\"4\"},\"motion\":\"Approve consent agenda as presented.\",\"mover\":\"unspecified\",\"second\":\"unspecified\",\"tally\":{\"yes\":5,\"no\":0,\"abstain\":0,\"absent\":0,\"recused\":0},\"outcome\":\"approved\",\"notes\":\"Standard consent agenda; no items removed.\"},{\"kind\":\"other\",\"identifiers\":{\"agenda_item_id\":\"5\"},\"motion\":\"Withdraw previous awarding of hot mix road procedures (Option 3) to Area Wide Paving due to bidder withdrawing bid; award to next lowest bidder to be considered.\",\"mover\":\"unspecified\",\"second\":\"unspecified\",\"tally\":{\"yes\":5,\"no\":0,\"abstain\":0,\"absent\":0,\"recused\":0},\"outcome\":\"approved\",\"notes\":\"Bidder indicated it would not honor original prices; withdrawal approved.\"},{\"kind\":\"contract_award\",\"identifiers\":{\"agenda_item_id\":\"6\"},\"motion\":\"Reaward road-and-bridge hot mix material bid (Option 3) for contract period 05/01/2025–04/30/2026 to the next lowest responsive bidder per original bid documents.\",\"mover\":\"unspecified\",\"second\":\"unspecified\",\"tally\":{\"yes\":5,\"no\":0,\"abstain\":0,\"absent\":0,\"recused\":0},\"outcome\":\"approved\",\"notes\":\"Transcript names next low bidder in discussion; official contract documents to reflect award.\"},{\"kind\":\"land_use\",\"identifiers\":{\"agenda_item_id\":\"7\"},\"motion\":\"Approve Dawson Creek Phase 1 subdivision plat (4 lots, County Road 2115, Precinct 2).\",\"mover\":\"unspecified\",\"second\":\"unspecified\",\"tally\":{\"yes\":5,\"no\":0,\"abstain\":0,\"absent\":0,\"recused\":0},\"outcome\":\"approved\",\"notes\":\"Applicant submitted required materials and complied with regulations.\"},{\"kind\":\"land_use\",\"identifiers\":{\"agenda_item_id\":\"8\"},\"motion\":\"Vacate Fairview Estates subdivision plat (County Road 2621, Precinct 2) with exception of four existing lots; remove public road dedications in vacated area and require new survey to be filed.\",\"mover\":\"unspecified\",\"second\":\"unspecified\",\"tally\":{\"yes\":5,\"no\":0,\"abstain\":0,\"absent\":0,\"recused\":0},\"outcome\":\"approved\",\"notes\":\"Motion amended to note survey filing and exceptions for four lots.\"},{\"kind\":\"land_use\",\"identifiers\":{\"agenda_item_id\":\"9\"},\"motion\":\"Approve The Peg (Nepey Estates) Lot 1 subdivision plat (5.94 acres, County Road 4106, Precinct 4).\",\"mover\":\"unspecified\",\"second\":\"unspecified\",\"tally\":{\"yes\":5,\"no\":0,\"abstain\":0,\"absent\":0,\"recused\":0},\"outcome\":\"approved\"},{\"kind\":\"other\",\"identifiers\":{\"agenda_item_id\":\"10\"},\"motion\":\"Table request for proposal for engineering analysis services for the jail and reissue as a Request for Qualifications.\",\"mover\":\"unspecified\",\"second\":\"unspecified\",\"tally\":{\"yes\":5,\"no\":0,\"abstain\":0,\"absent\":0,\"recused\":0},\"outcome\":\"tabled\",\"notes\":\"RFP requires revision; RFQ appropriate for engineering firms.\"},{\"kind\":\"resolution\",\"identifiers\":{\"agenda_item_id\":\"11\"},\"motion\":\"Allow the district attorney to spend up to $10,000 from the budgeted legal account for civil litigation purposes (to be ratified later).\",\"mover\":\"Commissioner Williams\",\"second\":\"unspecified\",\"tally\":{\"yes\":5,\"no\":0,\"abstain\":0,\"absent\":0,\"recused\":0},\"outcome\":\"approved\",\"notes\":\"Small, time-sensitive litigation expenditures allowed; larger expenditures require court approval.\"},{\"kind\":\"resolution\",\"identifiers\":{\"agenda_item_id\":\"12\"},\"motion\":\"Adopt resolution that if a tax increase is necessary for renovation of any county building, the commissioner's court will propose a bond election and not issue or propose a certificate of obligation.\",\"mover\":\"Commissioner Williams\",\"second\":\"unspecified\",\"tally\":{\"yes\":5,\"no\":0,\"abstain\":0,\"absent\":0,\"recused\":0},\"outcome\":\"approved\",\"notes\":\"Resolution commits court to present tax-increasing financing as a bond to voters.\"},{\"kind\":\"other\",\"identifiers\":{\"agenda_item_id\":\"13\"},\"motion\":\"Approve bond renewal for assistant county auditor (Lisa Hutchison) in amount of $5,000.\",\"mover\":\"unspecified\",\"second\":\"unspecified\",\"tally\":{\"yes\":5,\"no\":0,\"abstain\":0,\"absent\":0,\"recused\":0},\"outcome\":\"approved\"},{\"kind\":\"other\",\"identifiers\":{\"agenda_item_id\":\"14\"},\"motion\":\"Authorize Road & Bridge Precinct 3 to provide installation-only services for private driveway culverts on County Road 3504 when property owners purchase culverts.\",\"mover\":\"unspecified\",\"second\":\"unspecified\",\"tally\":{\"yes\":5,\"no\":0,\"abstain\":0,\"absent\":0,\"recused\":0},\"outcome\":\"approved\",\"notes\":\"Installation during road work protects pavement integrity; material purchase by property owner.\"},{\"kind\":\"other\",\"identifiers\":{\"agenda_item_id\":\"15\"},\"motion\":\"Approve six-month renewal concerning belly dump trailer lease(s) from Brazos Trailers for Precinct 3.\",\"mover\":\"unspecified\",\"second\":\"unspecified\",\"tally\":{\"yes\":5,\"no\":0,\"abstain\":0,\"absent\":0,\"recused\":0},\"outcome\":\"approved\",\"notes\":\"Renewal of existing trailer leases.\"},{\"kind\":\"other\",\"identifiers\":{\"agenda_item_id\":\"16\"},\"motion\":\"Approve order authorizing Memorial Day fireworks sales beginning 05/21/2025 and ending midnight 05/26/2025, per state statute.\",\"mover\":\"unspecified\",\"second\":\"unspecified\",\"tally\":{\"yes\":5,\"no\":0,\"abstain\":0,\"absent\":0,\"recused\":0},\"outcome\":\"approved\"} ]","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Van Zandt County Commissioners Regular Meeting 4/23/2025a","oneSentenceSummary","The commissioners' court approved the consent agenda and a series of routine and substantive items including bid withdrawals and reawards, subdivision plats, vacating a subdivision, extensions of leases and authorizing limited litigation spending. A resolution on financing courthouse renovations also passed.","taxTitle","Van Zandt County, Texas","taxId",63777,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6265094,"Commissioners back bond vote approach for courthouse renovations; public speakers urge purchase of nearby commercial building",2764,749520,3514095,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3095307-33f97feb44efce48ea30ac7efc9fbf4d&start=749&end=3514","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3095307-33f97feb44efce48ea30ac7efc9fbf4d/thumbnail_749520.jpg","/articles/6265094/Van-Zandt-County/Texas/Commissioners-back-bond-vote-approach-for-courthouse-renovations-public-speakers-urge-purchase-of-nearby-commercial-building","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6265094-6d086c15824e35409455295c5637b553/orig.mp4?Expires=1773372519&Signature=Q7oKU7CbTrQLXgvZzLv4u5tuXtTFH5dmAiSscoaHoojETb7I3RQRX1H-NU3KfdSsfOg1PnluL6gAFyX9w~UkMI2elPnYDJNuJBI01H-KgYyc7hQ845UMzMyqyJ3rrh0qked~ZYs1mJjQMsvUkehbQEM27d7osUitr6zbNzuRkrxJS5t61U8yqiIlJG~jlXz1-wLwUlcNgjcdbfeAE45yi~Mg73JYPhKd5BCIps7kSWuTKA-dVrouOL5lds4nTou-EFjPQnlXhQ0RS~r9wQ6aksEc0a6jhow6nRvT-3-2nvTQ5bcSakaI8Q3UQGU0~tPDK169S0HiLKBPFhPtvfU~4A__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Van Zandt County commissioners debated plans for renovating the 1930 North Trade Days Boulevard courthouse and passed a resolution stating that if a tax increase is necessary for renovation of county buildings, the court will propose a bond election rather than use a certificate of obligation.

Members of the public emphasized the courthouse's deteriorating condition and urged the court to purchase the nearby Paul Michael building to provide immediate office space while restoration proceeds. Several speakers described the age and condition of documents and the building, and one speaker presented a written legal opinion questioning whether purchasing the Paul Michael building as an emergency expenditure would meet the statutory test for an unbudgeted emergency.

Why it matters: commissioners said the courthouse—built in 1937—needs significant work and that the county lacks sufficient space for current operations as the population has grown. The Paul Michael building was discussed as a potential interim campus for county offices; commissioners said a purchase would affect renovation planning and might reduce the need to lease multiple downtown buildings.

Public comments and legal context
During the public-comment period multiple residents urged the court to acquire the Paul Michael building and to preserve the historic courthouse. Jackie Reisner, who identified herself as born and raised in Van Zandt County and with long service in county fairs and extension work, suggested the court consider buying and remodeling a vacant building on the town edge as an economical alternative and then repair the courthouse for community use. \"I encourage you to consider the plan of buying and remodeling the facility you're looking at. Vacate the courthouse and pursue grant to repair it, and then let the public use it,\" Reisner said.

Leanne Reisner told the court she toured the courthouse and found documents dating to 1895 deteriorating on the fifth floor; she urged purchase of the Paul Michael building to protect the records. Brian Cummins, a former county extension agent, and Suba, a lifelong resident, also urged acquisition to secure space and preserve the courthouse.

Christie Beckham, citing a memorandum written by Tom Duke (not present), read sections of the Texas Local Government Code and argued the court could authorize an emergency expenditure only if it met the code's four-part test: a grave public necessity caused by an unusual and unforeseen condition that could not have been included in the budget through reasonably diligent attention. Beckham said the county's own actions in signing a sales contract without budgeted funds made it difficult to characterize the purchase as an unforeseeable emergency.

Commission discussion and court resolution
One commissioner said restoring and keeping the courthouse was a priority but acknowledged that work will cost and that the Paul Michael building, if acquired, could provide space for county operations while renovation occurs. A motion by the commissioner who introduced the resolution stated: \"If a tax increase would be necessary for renovation of any county building, the commissioner's court will propose a bond election and not issue or propose a certificate of obligation, which the citizens of Van Zandt shall vote to approve or deny.\" The motion passed on a voice vote.

Commissioners and the judge also discussed grant opportunities for courthouse restoration that recur every two years and said they will pursue design, cost estimates and a public engagement process before any bond measure is finalized.

Provenance
Topic intro: public-comment remarks urging purchase and preservation (transcript start time 00:12:29.520).

Topic finish: the resolution vote and discussion of next steps including grant cycles and need for design/cost estimates (transcript start time 00:58:40.090).","After public comment urging acquisition of the Paul Michael building to ease space constraints, the commission passed a resolution saying any tax increase to renovate county buildings would be proposed as a bond election rather than issued as a certificate of obligation.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6265099,"Commissioners extend TRO on Commodore Best battery project; court authorizes DA to spend up to $10,000 for related litigation",2755,445245,3201135,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3095307-33f97feb44efce48ea30ac7efc9fbf4d&start=445&end=3201","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3095307-33f97feb44efce48ea30ac7efc9fbf4d/thumbnail_445245.jpg","/articles/6265099/Van-Zandt-County/Texas/Commissioners-extend-TRO-on-Commodore-Best-battery-project-court-authorizes-DA-to-spend-up-to-10000-for-related-litigation","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6265099-5a78ee15bcad4215c92e13aebbc8ec6c/orig.mp4?Expires=1773372519&Signature=a1eQPTxirrUJDqWXgqHEMVND8dO~3QR5qORNDHl9eRRJGcIFuXz0bXB4OHV2hU-iALTbpzrJq2J9yb4wap3sgu6syHYQ74ETmAEebeUqS8IZygUCOXP3Zwr~7T9yo2qumTHpqHh8KevgSeCT-hpEQlOEv5QMIb7Pq09AfbhMBX4e-8YRwYERAFJqt~7LbtwD0vsnaeTWdHj5AbSBT9rBpawQE5DOyEZd04PWkzmMGzLbzYsdShAeCZFd5iFTpfbhmCbGnxa430nsv1lAUIUsTNS9-fLpgevqPJ3ivHyhRfYv8TptoYCQJ3Me6XgpzED5hg0cnIira1ojMjIRcXJ0dg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Van Zandt County's commissioners court extended a temporary restraining order (TRO) against companies developing the Commodore Best battery energy storage facility and approved a motion authorizing the district attorney to spend up to $10,000 for civil litigation expenses, the court said during its meeting.

The TRO, first granted two weeks earlier, was extended for an additional two weeks while county legal staff negotiate with developers and continue to press for the required testing the county says has not been performed. \"If they refuse or cannot produce those, passing test results that are satisfactory to the fire marshal, then we will go forward with the litigation,\" the district attorney said during the court's update.

Why it matters: county officials said the TRO prevents the companies from bringing batteries into Van Zandt County while fire-safety testing is reviewed. The district attorney told the court that litigation and time-sensitive steps such as service of process and contracting expert witnesses require the ability to incur small, immediate expenses without waiting for full court approval.

Court action and legal background
The district attorney reported that the county filed a petition for a TRO against the corporations developing the Commodore Best facility in the southwestern portion of the county (Precinct 2) and that the TRO was granted, then extended by agreement for another two weeks. \"So the TRO is in place for another 2 weeks while we continue to work toward seeing if there is any type of agreement that they are willing to make that would satisfy us with regard to the required testing that they have not done yet,\" the district attorney said.

During discussion of a separate agenda item, the court approved a motion authorizing the district attorney to spend up to $10,000 from the county's legal account for civil litigation purposes related to this case and other county civil litigation. The district attorney told the court small, time-sensitive expenses—fees for process servers, consultant deposits and similar items—have arisen since the TRO was filed and that requiring pre-approval at every step would impair the county's ability to meet litigation deadlines. \"My office is essentially a law firm…and for me to have to wait two weeks to do anything in litigation for you guys to approve it in advance is just not gonna work,\" the district attorney said.

The court emphasized that expenditures made under the authorization will be brought back for ratification and will appear in public bills for review. The motion passed on a voice vote.

What happens next
Court members said they will continue negotiations with the developers and that, if test results satisfactory to the county fire marshal are not produced, the county will proceed with litigation after the TRO expires. The district attorney and court members said they expect litigation-related costs to exceed the $10,000 cap in aggregate, but they will return to the court for approval when larger expenses are needed.

Provenance
Topic intro: \"As the court knows, from the resolution passed 2 weeks ago, the county filed, a petition for temporary restraining order against the corporations who are involved in developing the Commodore Best facility…\" (transcript start time 00:07:25.245).

Topic finish: \"But when it's small things like $55 here and there, the preapproval, is the only way we can successfully get through this lawsuit.\" (transcript start time 00:53:24.735).","Van Zandt County extended a temporary restraining order that bars companies from bringing battery systems into the county while officials seek test results; the court also approved a limited spending authorization for the district attorney to pay litigation-related costs.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Votes at a glance: Van Zandt County commissioners approve resolutions, bids, plats and administrative items

Commissioners back bond vote approach for courthouse renovations; public speakers urge purchase of nearby commercial building

Commissioners extend TRO on Commodore Best battery project; court authorizes DA to spend up to $10,000 for related litigation