Oregon representatives oppose House Bill 3838's impact on senior care services

The House Committee on Rules convened on April 28, 2025, to discuss significant legislative matters impacting Oregon's long-term care services. The primary focus was House Bill 3,838, which has drawn considerable opposition from various stakeholders in the senior care community.

The meeting began with testimonies from representatives of nonprofit continuing care retirement communities, including Williger Plaza. They expressed concerns that the proposed bill could jeopardize their financial stability and the quality of care provided to residents. The representatives emphasized that their organizations have made long-term financial commitments to support residents who may outlive their resources. They argued that the bill would impose financial burdens that could lead to reduced care options and potentially force some facilities to close.

Jocelyn Cook, a member of the Long Term Care Administrators Board, also voiced her opposition to the bill. She highlighted the existing regulations for training care staff and the challenges of retaining workers in the current labor market. Cook pointed out that raising wages across the board does not necessarily lead to a sustainable solution, as providers often follow suit, leading to no real increase in compensation. She urged the committee to focus on attracting and training more direct care workers instead of advancing the bill.

State Representative Ed Deal further criticized House Bill 3,838, arguing that it undermines the legislative authority by removing the ability of elected officials to set policy standards for the health care workforce. He noted that many home care workers oppose the bill, feeling it imposes union-like structures without their consent. Deal warned that the bill could expose the state to legal challenges, referencing ongoing lawsuits in Minnesota over similar legislation.

The committee heard from additional stakeholders, including Andrea Carr from Klamath County, who traveled over 450 miles to present her views. The testimonies underscored a shared concern about the potential negative impacts of the bill on care quality and workforce stability.

As the meeting progressed, it became clear that there is a strong consensus among many participants to oppose House Bill 3,838. The discussions highlighted the urgent need for solutions that prioritize workforce development and sustainable care options rather than imposing new regulations that could hinder service delivery.

The committee is expected to continue deliberations on the bill, with many advocates urging a reevaluation of priorities to better support the growing demand for direct care workers in Oregon.