Buckeye Board continues AT&T cell tower decision for further public input on May 21

The Maricopa County Board of Supervisors convened on April 9, 2025, to address several agenda items, including a request for a continuance and a contentious proposal for a wireless communication facility at Crossland Baptist Church.

The meeting began with a discussion regarding item number 6, where the applicant was not present. Tom Ellsworth, the director of planning and development, confirmed that the applicant requested a continuance to the May 21 meeting to align their zoning request with a comprehensive plan amendment. The board unanimously approved the motion to continue this item.

Moving on to item number 7, the board addressed the proposal for a wireless communication facility at Crossland Baptist Church. The applicant, Bill Kony, participated remotely and explained the rationale for selecting the church location. He emphasized the need for improved coverage in the area, citing the absence of suitable commercial or industrial sites. Kony assured the board that the proposed stealth bell tower design would blend with the church's architecture and conceal the necessary equipment.

However, the proposal faced significant opposition from community members. Several speakers expressed concerns about the potential health risks associated with the tower's proximity to schools and residential areas. Lori Barone, one of the opposition speakers, highlighted that 60% of the local population had registered their opposition, questioning who the board was serving if they approved the project. Roger Pickrell echoed these sentiments, calling for a formal independent study on the health impacts before proceeding.

The board was informed that the request for the cell tower included a reduction in the required setback from property lines, which raised further concerns among residents. Staff reported receiving 11 letters of opposition and only one letter of support, which was from outside the 300-foot radius required for consideration of community input.

Supervisor Lesko sought clarification on the zoning regulations and the implications of the proposed tower's location. Staff confirmed that while cell towers are permitted by right in the zoning district, the specific request involved a reduction in setback requirements and an increase in the antenna array's diameter.

The meeting concluded with no immediate decision on the wireless facility, as the board continued to weigh the community's concerns against the applicant's need for improved service coverage. The next steps will involve further discussions and potential follow-up actions at the upcoming meetings.