City Council considers McDonald's drive through appeal amid traffic and safety concerns

The Bellflower City Council convened on April 28, 2025, to address a significant appeal concerning a proposed McDonald's restaurant with a drive-through at 16211 Bellefargo. The council's discussions centered around the Planning Commission's previous denial of the project, which raised concerns about traffic, access, and the site's designation as a housing opportunity area.

The appeal was presented by Robert Priest of Design UA Incorporated, who argued that the project complied with zoning regulations allowing for commercial drive-through uses. However, the Planning Commission had expressed reservations about the potential impact on traffic and the need for residential development in the area, as the site is identified as a housing opportunity in the city's housing element.

During the meeting, city staff highlighted ongoing discussions with McDonald's representatives to address concerns raised during the Planning Commission's review. The council was presented with a detailed analysis of the proposed restaurant's design, which included two drive-through lanes and a total of 24 parking spaces. Traffic studies indicated that the restaurant would not significantly increase traffic volume, as it would primarily serve existing drivers on Bellflower Boulevard.

Council members raised questions about the adequacy of access to the site, particularly regarding the potential for delivery trucks to block traffic. The Planning Commission had recommended exploring alternative access options, such as a reciprocal agreement with neighboring properties, but these discussions had not yielded positive results.

The council also discussed the implications of the Metro light rail project, which is expected to increase traffic congestion in the area. Concerns were voiced about the safety of pedestrians and cyclists, given the proximity of the proposed restaurant to a busy bike and pedestrian trail.

As the meeting progressed, council members debated the merits of continuing the public hearing to allow for further discussions with McDonald's and traffic engineers. The potential for modifying the project to better align with community needs and safety standards was a focal point of the conversation.

In conclusion, the Bellflower City Council's deliberations on the McDonald's appeal reflect broader concerns about urban development, traffic management, and housing needs in the community. The council's decision to continue the public hearing will provide an opportunity for further examination of the project's implications and potential adjustments to meet the city's goals. The outcome of this appeal could set a precedent for future developments in the area, particularly regarding the balance between commercial growth and residential needs.