Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Florida House reviews Class M, C license requirements for security professionals

April 25, 2025 | House Bills - Introduced, House Bills, 2025 House and Senate Bills, Florida Legislation Bills, Florida


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Florida House reviews Class M, C license requirements for security professionals
In the bustling halls of the Florida State Legislature, a significant legislative proposal is making waves. House Bill 991, introduced on April 25, 2025, aims to reshape the landscape of private security licensing in the state. As lawmakers gather to discuss the bill, the air is thick with anticipation and debate over its potential impact on public safety and the security industry.

At its core, House Bill 991 seeks to amend existing licensing requirements for private security personnel, specifically targeting the qualifications needed for various classes of licenses. The bill proposes that applicants for a Class "C" license must possess two years of verifiable, full-time experience in private investigative work or related fields. Additionally, it emphasizes the importance of formal education, allowing for college coursework in criminal justice or law enforcement training to count toward the experience requirement, albeit with limitations. Notably, the bill explicitly states that experience in bodyguard services will not be credited, a provision that has sparked considerable discussion among stakeholders.

Supporters of the bill argue that these changes are essential for enhancing the professionalism and accountability of the private security sector. They believe that by raising the bar for entry into the field, the bill will ultimately lead to better-trained security personnel, which could enhance public safety. However, critics express concerns that the new requirements may create barriers for individuals seeking to enter the profession, particularly those from diverse backgrounds who may not have access to formal training or education.

The legislative discussions surrounding House Bill 991 have not been without contention. Amendments have been proposed to address concerns about accessibility and to ensure that the bill does not disproportionately affect underrepresented groups. Lawmakers are grappling with the balance between maintaining high standards in the security industry and fostering inclusivity.

The implications of House Bill 991 extend beyond the immediate changes to licensing. Experts suggest that if passed, the bill could lead to a ripple effect throughout the private security industry, potentially influencing hiring practices and training programs statewide. As the bill moves through the legislative process, its fate remains uncertain, but its potential to reshape the security landscape in Florida is undeniable.

As the sun sets on another day in the legislature, the discussions around House Bill 991 continue, reflecting a broader conversation about safety, professionalism, and opportunity in the evolving world of private security. Whether this bill will pave the way for a more regulated industry or create new challenges for aspiring security professionals remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: the stakes are high, and the dialogue is just beginning.

View Bill

This article is based on a bill currently being presented in the state government—explore the full text of the bill for a deeper understanding and compare it to the constitution

View Bill

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Florida articles free in 2025

Republi.us
Republi.us
Family Scribe
Family Scribe