[{"_1":2,"_87":-5,"_88":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6256335,"mediaKeyId","3156704-329e5d29ed2c0a66667d8406bb248e87","parentId",3156704,"title","Board approves emergency measures for post-fire cleanup after residents urge testing and aid","audioSeconds",350,"startMs",4386000,"endMs",4736000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=3156704-329e5d29ed2c0a66667d8406bb248e87&start=4386&end=4736","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3156704-329e5d29ed2c0a66667d8406bb248e87/thumbnail_4386000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6256335/Los-Angeles-County/California/Board-approves-emergency-measures-for-post-fire-cleanup-after-residents-urge-testing-and-aid","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6256335-7a12f8e2c6931bbca21cbe6c2361a25a/orig.mp4?Expires=1771129764&Signature=AOatn4ST37Q1b3ULWpx0zZEv902QUds2vWeYjpuYXO5JlCcVObCxjXH3-9wrPANbFrMuA7POmewqPUHrHDnDzQsTyX0uQ4aJ5-TDD4AUr5GvhCS77R6LfspFgnhAybKDjClrlPWn8LWHeT9UmjDbHEmdZSnC2ZflumFWXYXeKNo~D5kumq~4WTkj4w0s5tdghRVVRXWEuHAA3QyRcKXX6jn4HGi1urQQxD3pPFC2Sd4IjsXVdo7~WpOGfUgXG2gsecv9LLlz42Hn~DRhCdCF2PNG9hoin~9T-yHAlzNWHR5vxsKa2xE~2ZiAQfIF4f5tAf17qmE-7PrWRPH0tqxovA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Los Angeles County CA","date","2025-04-29T21:28:46Z","article","The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors on April 29 approved urgency measures allowing the county to begin expedited abatement of fire debris on private properties and took related administrative steps after dozens of residents and local advocates described lingering indoor contamination, uninsured expenses and confusion about remediation.

The action came after sustained public comment from residents who identified themselves as members of Eaton Fire Residents United and other neighborhood groups pleading for testing and financial support. Supervisor Kathryn Barger, chairing the meeting, and other supervisors voted to approve the items after the executive officer reported there were no protests or other legal barriers to proceeding.

Why it matters: Public commenters and several supervisors said the primary risk is indoor contamination — not just burned structures — and that children and renters are especially vulnerable. Residents said some insurers, especially Californias Fair Plan, have refused to pay for environmental testing or remediation, leaving displaced households with large out‑of‑pocket bills. County action to clear debris and to fund testing will determine how quickly families can safely return to standing homes and how public spaces that children use will be cleared.

Most important facts
- The board approved the administrative items tied to post‑fire cleanup in motions recorded during the April 29 meeting. The roll calls in the transcript show aye votes from supervisors identified during votes as Solis, Mitchell, Hahn and Barger; the formal recorded tallies in the transcript were four ayes and no no votes on the key items discussed in public comment.
- Survivors, homeowners and renters described widespread testing gaps. Dawn Fanning, identified as a member of Eaton Fire Residents United and a landlord, said, “I never received any clear guidance on how to protect my tenants or my own liability,” and asked the board for clear policies and resources.
- Supervisor Holly Mitchell told the board she had put forward a motion to allocate $3,000,000 for testing: “I brought in a motion to put forward 3,000,000 toward doing testing,” she said during public remarks recorded in the meeting.
- County staff and callers reported that many affected homeowners carry coverage through the California Fair Plan, which callers said excludes environmental testing and remediation costs. Several speakers asked the county to pursue funding or insurance mandates to cover testing and cleanup.

What the board did and what followed
The meeting agenda showed the hold on items 6 and 10 had been released and public comments were taken before the votes. After public testimony, the board moved and approved the items noted on the agenda related to post‑fire abatement and associated administrative matters. The transcript records the following formal outcomes (roll calls and exact motion texts are included below in \"Votes at a glance\").

Public testimony and requests
Residents and local volunteers described persistent environmental concerns and financial strain:
- Jennifer Kennedy, an attorney and member of Eaton Fire Residents United, said: “Now 3 months after the fire, homeowners are still confused and we need reliable and consistent professional guidance on how to remediate for damage from smoke contamination and also heavy metals.”
- Kenneth Bowman, who identified himself as a member of Eaton Fire Residents United, urged the board to “find whatever monies they can to pay for testing, both in standing structures, public and private.”
- Jessica Cabrera, an infant‑mental‑health professional and EFRU member, told the board: “Without comprehensive indoor testing to guide remediation, we're gambling with our children's futures.”
Multiple speakers asked the county to test not only private homes but also public places children use, such as schools, libraries and parks, and to publish test results and remediation plans.

Discussion vs. decisions
- Discussion: Residents raised specific technical concerns (lead, asbestos, cyanide and other fire‑related contaminants), gaps in insurance coverage and the need for clear remediation standards. Several speakers described personal financial hardship and displacement while cleanup or testing is pending.
- Direction/assignment: Supervisor Mitchell said she had submitted a motion to dedicate $3,000,000 to testing; supervisors also said they would continue working with philanthropic partners and county public health to widen testing and outreach.
- Formal action: The board approved the agenda items that will enable expedited abatement and related administrative actions (see \"Votes at a glance\"). The transcript records the roll calls for those approvals.

Votes at a glance
(Each entry lists the item as read on the posted agenda, the motion outcome and the roll call recorded in the transcript.)
- Item 6 — Adopt urgency ordinance and related administrative steps to enable prompt abatement of fire debris from uncleared properties: Motion moved and seconded; roll call in transcript records ayes from Supervisors Hilda Solis, Holly Mitchell, Janice Hahn and Kathryn Barger. Outcome: approved (motion carries; recorded tally: 4 ayes, 0 no).
- Item 10 — Administrative matters tied to post‑fire abatement and county response: Motion moved and seconded; roll call in the transcript lists ayes from Supervisors Hilda Solis, Holly Mitchell, Janice Hahn and Kathryn Barger. Outcome: approved (recorded roll call ayes: 4, no: 0).
- Item 1 — Public hearing on increasing an assessment rate for Landscaping and Lighting Act District 2, Zone 21 (Sunset Point) for FY 2025–26: Executive officer reported no majority protest; board adopted the resolution ordering the rate increase. Roll call recorded ayes from Supervisors Hilda Solis, Holly Mitchell, Janice Hahn and Kathryn Barger. Outcome: approved (4–0).
- Item 5 — Continued to May 27, 2025 at board request. Outcome: continued (motion carries 4–0).
- Items 7, 8 and 9 — Administrative items approved earlier in the meeting as grouped motions. Roll calls recorded ayes from Supervisors Solis, Mitchell, Hahn and Barger. Outcome: approved (4–0).
- Item 11 (see separate article): Settlement item was considered and approved by the board; public comment on the settlement is summarized in a companion article.

Clarifying details extracted from the meeting
- Proposed testing allocation: Supervisor Holly Mitchell referenced a $3,000,000 motion for testing (source_speaker: Supervisor Holly Mitchell).
- Insurance gap: Multiple callers identified the California Fair Plan as excluding environmental testing/remediation (source_speaker: several EFRU members; text in public comment).
- Types of contamination cited by callers: lead, asbestos, cyanide and “fire residue” from indoor smoke/ash (source_speaker: Anita Kazarian, Corinna Saranger and others).

Proper names mentioned repeatedly
Los Angeles County; Eaton Fire / Eden Fire (residents used both names in testimony); Eaton Fire Residents United; California Fair Plan; Altadena; Pasadena; Sierra Madre; Department of Public Health (county staff referenced by callers); Board of Supervisors (Chair Kathryn Barger; Supervisors Hilda Solis, Holly Mitchell, Janice Hahn, Lindsay Horvath).

Community relevance
- Geographies affected: Altadena, Pasadena, Sierra Madre and neighboring neighborhoods near the Eaton Fire burn area.
- Impact groups: displaced homeowners, renters, children and other vulnerable residents, and property owners insured through the California Fair Plan.
- Funding sources discussed: county discretionary funds (motion for $3,000,000), philanthropic contributions and potential insurance (California Fair Plan) coverage shortfalls.

Meeting context
- Engagement level: high public engagement on the Eaton Fire topic with multiple speakers from affected neighborhoods and organized neighborhood groups; public testimony on the issue ran for an extended portion of the meeting.
- Implementation risk: medium. County abatement requires coordination with property owners, insurers and contractors; testing and remediation timelines depend on funding and vendor availability.
- History: speakers said testing and remediation struggles have continued for months since the fire; a motion to allocate funds for testing was presented at this meeting.

Provenance (transcript evidence)
- topicintro: {\"block_id\":\"t_4386.295\",\"local_start\":0,\"local_end\":183,\"evidence_excerpt\":\"We will now move on to item number 6 and 10. However, 6 and 10, the, the hold on item 6 and 10 have been released, but we still need to take public comment and also vote on the item.\" ,\"reason_code\":\"topicintro\"}
- topfinish: {\"block_id\":\"t_4720.96\",\"local_start\":0,\"local_end\":60,\"evidence_excerpt\":\"Supervisor Barger? Aye. Supervisor Barger? Aye. Motion carries 4 to 0.\",\"reason_code\":\"topicfinish\"}

Topics and scoring
- {\"name\":\"environmental_health\",\"justification\":\"Central subject: indoor contamination and post‑fire debris abatement discussed at length by residents and supervisors\",\"scoring\":{\"topic_relevance\":1.00,\"depth_score\":0.80,\"opinionatedness\":0.05,\"controversy\":0.50,\"civic_salience\":0.90,\"impactfulness\":0.85,\"geo_relevance\":1.00}}
- {\"name\":\"disaster_recovery\",\"justification\":\"Actions implement emergency cleanup and testing after a local wildfire\",\"scoring\":{\"topic_relevance\":0.95,\"depth_score\":0.70,\"opinionatedness\":0.05,\"controversy\":0.40,\"civic_salience\":0.85,\"impactfulness\":0.80,\"geo_relevance\":1.00}}

Speakers
[{\"name\":\"Kathryn Barger\",\"role_title\":\"Chair, Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors\",\"affiliation_type\":\"government\"},{\"name\":\"Hilda Solis\",\"role_title\":\"Supervisor, Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors\",\"affiliation_type\":\"government\"},{\"name\":\"Holly Mitchell\",\"role_title\":\"Supervisor, Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors\",\"affiliation_type\":\"government\"},{\"name\":\"Janice Hahn\",\"role_title\":\"Supervisor, Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors\",\"affiliation_type\":\"government\"},{\"name\":\"Lindsay Horvath\",\"role_title\":\"Supervisor, Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors\",\"affiliation_type\":\"government\"},{\"name\":\"Dawn Fanning\",\"role_title\":\"Member, Eaton Fire Residents United; displaced Altadena resident; landlord\",\"affiliation_type\":\"citizen\"},{\"name\":\"Jennifer Kennedy\",\"role_title\":\"Attorney; member, Eaton Fire Residents United\",\"affiliation_type\":\"citizen\"},{\"name\":\"Kenneth Bowman\",\"role_title\":\"Member, Eaton Fire Residents United\",\"affiliation_type\":\"citizen\"},{\"name\":\"Anita Kazarian\",\"role_title\":\"Member, Eaton Fire Residents United\",\"affiliation_type\":\"citizen\"},{\"name\":\"Gail Barrow\",\"role_title\":\"Member, Eaton Fire Residents United\",\"affiliation_type\":\"citizen\"},{\"name\":\"Lisa Schultz\",\"role_title\":\"Member, Eaton Fire Residents United\",\"affiliation_type\":\"citizen\"},{\"name\":\"Corinna Saranger\",\"role_title\":\"Member, Eaton Fire Residents United\",\"affiliation_type\":\"citizen\"},{\"name\":\"Jessica Cabrera\",\"role_title\":\"Infant mental health professional; member, Eaton Fire Residents United\",\"affiliation_type\":\"citizen\"},{\"name\":\"Joe Hardesty\",\"role_title\":\"Member, Eaton Fire Residents United\",\"affiliation_type\":\"citizen\"}]

Authorities
[{\"type\":\"other\",\"name\":\"Landscaping and Lighting Act (district assessments)\",\"citation\":\"not specified\",\"referenced_by\":[\"Item 1\"]},{\"type\":\"statute\",\"name\":\"Brown Act\",\"citation\":\"California Government Code (Brown Act)\",\"referenced_by\":[\"Closed session notice\"]}]

Actions
[{\"kind\":\"other\",\"identifiers\":{\"agenda_item_id\":\"6\"},\"motion\":\"Adopt urgency ordinance and related administrative steps to enable prompt abatement of fire debris from uncleared properties (item 6)\",\"mover\":\"\",\"second\":\"\",\"vote_record\":[{\"member\":\"Hilda Solis\",\"vote\":\"yes\"},{\"member\":\"Holly Mitchell\",\"vote\":\"yes\"},{\"member\":\"Janice Hahn\",\"vote\":\"yes\"},{\"member\":\"Kathryn Barger\",\"vote\":\"yes\"}],\"tally\":{\"yes\":4,\"no\":0,\"abstain\":0,\"absent\":1},\"legal_threshold\":{\"met\":true,\"notes\":\"standard majority; no majority protest reported\"},\"outcome\":\"approved\",\"notes\":\"Hold on item released; public comment taken\"},{\"kind\":\"other\",\"identifiers\":{\"agenda_item_id\":\"10\"},\"motion\":\"Adopt administrative matters related to post‑fire abatement and county response (item 10)\",\"mover\":\"\",\"second\":\"\",\"vote_record\":[{\"member\":\"Hilda Solis\",\"vote\":\"yes\"},{\"member\":\"Holly Mitchell\",\"vote\":\"yes\"},{\"member\":\"Janice Hahn\",\"vote\":\"yes\"},{\"member\":\"Kathryn Barger\",\"vote\":\"yes\"}],\"tally\":{\"yes\":4,\"no\":0,\"abstain\":0,\"absent\":1},\"legal_threshold\":{\"met\":true,\"notes\":\"administrative approval recorded\"},\"outcome\":\"approved\",\"notes\":\"Public comment emphasized testing needs\"},{\"kind\":\"other\",\"identifiers\":{\"agenda_item_id\":\"1\"},\"motion\":\"Adopt resolution ordering increase to existing landscape maintenance assessment for Landscaping and Lighting Act District 2, Zone 21 (Sunset Point) for FY 2025–26\",\"mover\":\"\",\"second\":\"\",\"vote_record\":[{\"member\":\"Hilda Solis\",\"vote\":\"yes\"},{\"member\":\"Holly Mitchell\",\"vote\":\"yes\"},{\"member\":\"Janice Hahn\",\"vote\":\"yes\"},{\"member\":\"Kathryn Barger\",\"vote\":\"yes\"}],\"tally\":{\"yes\":4,\"no\":0,\"abstain\":0,\"absent\":1},\"legal_threshold\":{\"met\":true,\"notes\":\"executive officer reported no majority protest\"},\"outcome\":\"approved\",\"notes\":\"Ballot tabulation reported no majority protest\"},{\"kind\":\"other\",\"identifiers\":{\"agenda_item_id\":\"5\"},\"motion\":\"Continue item 5 to May 27, 2025\",\"mover\":\"Kathryn Barger\",\"second\":\"Janice Hahn\",\"vote_record\":[{\"member\":\"Hilda Solis\",\"vote\":\"yes\"},{\"member\":\"Holly Mitchell\",\"vote\":\"yes\"},{\"member\":\"Janice Hahn\",\"vote\":\"yes\"},{\"member\":\"Kathryn Barger\",\"vote\":\"yes\"}],\"tally\":{\"yes\":4,\"no\":0,\"abstain\":0,\"absent\":1},\"legal_threshold\":{\"met\":true,\"notes\":\"board continued the item\"},\"outcome\":\"postponed\",\"notes\":\"continued to 05/27/2025\"},{\"kind\":\"other\",\"identifiers\":{\"agenda_item_id\":\"7-9\"},\"motion\":\"Approve administrative matters on pages noted (items 7, 8, 9)\",\"mover\":\"Hilda Solis\",\"second\":\"Holly Mitchell\",\"vote_record\":[{\"member\":\"Hilda Solis\",\"vote\":\"yes\"},{\"member\":\"Holly Mitchell\",\"vote\":\"yes\"},{\"member\":\"Janice Hahn\",\"vote\":\"yes\"},{\"member\":\"Kathryn Barger\",\"vote\":\"yes\"}],\"tally\":{\"yes\":4,\"no\":0,\"abstain\":0,\"absent\":1},\"legal_threshold\":{\"met\":true},\"outcome\":\"approved\",\"notes\":\"Group motion approved by roll call\"}]

Searchable_tags:[\"Eaton Fire\",\"Altadena\",\"post-fire cleanup\",\"environmental testing\",\"Los Angeles County\",\"California Fair Plan\",\"board votes\"]","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors Meeting 4/29/25","oneSentenceSummary","The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors on April 29 approved urgency measures allowing the county to begin expedited abatement of fire debris on private properties and took related administrative steps after residents of Altadena and nearby areas urged comprehensive indoor testing and financial support.","taxTitle","Los Angeles County, California","taxId",2588,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6256330,"Board approves settlement on juvenile‑abuse claims; survivors and callers press for prosecutions and limits on legal fees",122,4296000,4418000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3156704-329e5d29ed2c0a66667d8406bb248e87&start=4296&end=4418","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3156704-329e5d29ed2c0a66667d8406bb248e87/thumbnail_4296000.jpg","/articles/6256330/Los-Angeles-County/California/Board-approves-settlement-on-juvenileabuse-claims-survivors-and-callers-press-for-prosecutions-and-limits-on-legal-fees","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6256330-e5c086ea09e78cd4d0f222042b42ada4/orig.mp4?Expires=1771129764&Signature=ldfNlIaORoFls2mA9GVkTsv9TtqUaStFXUhoOZpGUW4PbUmq4qb2KC2O8ljCFmdTG25lGwy3IMSPWkQCh6Ij~m-fj16-7fjdsqsTAADZU5VnIITlHq~YzZcsr0UgcCbJ3ZKIPZRcr8mqJF2lvG4B7JJSJlwasPaKeu0xp7qzqIT8dO43uNI3RQX5PijTgOfsEEJt2H5686Mc3TE7v1pNGQXba7X5o4lTJp6V8kypD1kh2zaAzooWxiQgK9cqOWFDW5hYRWdpaXPpkD~AJTHttb-mmKccJaPrzZlTFKXx70oqdvL3K9AgXOMyrXkPE1Op4hlLlwQThhBkOfgShyze2w__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors on April 29 approved an item the public described during comment as a settlement to resolve historic juvenile‑abuse claims. The board’s recorded roll call on the agenda item shows aye votes from the supervisors recorded in the transcript; the motion passed without recorded no votes.

Why it matters: Several survivors and members of the public addressed the board urging accountability, additional investigations and changes to how settlement money is used. Callers described long‑running harms from abuse in county care settings and urged action that goes beyond financial settlements, including prosecution of alleged perpetrators and limits on attorneys’ fees.

What the board did
The board moved and approved the item listed on the agenda as item 11. The transcript records the roll call with ayes from supervisors identified as Hilda Solis, Holly Mitchell, Janice Hahn and Kathryn Barger; the clerk recorded the motion as carrying 4 to 0.

Public comments on the settlement
- Eric Previn, a caller during general public comment, said the settlement amount on the table (referenced in public remarks as $4,000,000,000) had not been litigated and urged redirecting funds into investigation and prosecution. He told the board: “Divide the settlement by 4, cap the legal fees at 10%. There’s no reason for these attorneys for filing this paperwork to get so rich. And reinvest the rest of the money…in actually investigating and prosecuting the perpetrator bastards.”
- Survivors who identified themselves as part of the claimant group described life‑long harm. Kathy Curry, who said she was abused as a child, told the board: “I had my whole childhood taken from me…Those people need to be accountable.” Other speakers urged criminal investigations and said systemic failures had allowed abuse to continue.

Discussion vs. decision
- Discussion: Public comment was strongly focused on accountability, prosecutorial action and how settlement funds should be allocated. Callers also criticized the county’s reliance on internal investigations and asked for independent review.
- Formal action: The board approved the agenda item (item 11) during the open meeting. The transcript shows the motion carried by recorded ayes and no reportable action from closed session was announced later.

Clarifying details and next steps
- Several callers asked that part of any settlement be devoted to prosecution and independent investigation rather than administrative reforms alone. The board did not provide a detailed breakdown of settlement distribution during the public portion of the meeting; specific allocations and enforcement steps were not described in the transcript.
- A caller suggested capping attorneys’ fees at 10%; that proposal was offered as public comment and was not adopted during the open meeting as a board action.

Provenance (transcript evidence)
- topicintro: {\"block_id\":\"t_4296.785\",\"local_start\":0,\"local_end\":56,\"evidence_excerpt\":\"And in my 4 decades here in LA County, we've really worked, tremendously together within our Armenian community and also with our larger Los Angeles community. For example, I'm part of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons...\" ,\"reason_code\":\"topicintro\"}
- topfinish: {\"block_id\":\"t_4318.0103\",\"local_start\":0,\"local_end\":40,\"evidence_excerpt\":\"Supervisor Barger, aye. Motion carries 4 to 0.\",\"reason_code\":\"topicfinish\"}

Speakers
[{\"name\":\"Kathryn Barger\",\"role_title\":\"Chair, Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors\",\"affiliation_type\":\"government\"},{\"name\":\"Hilda Solis\",\"role_title\":\"Supervisor, Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors\",\"affiliation_type\":\"government\"},{\"name\":\"Holly Mitchell\",\"role_title\":\"Supervisor, Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors\",\"affiliation_type\":\"government\"},{\"name\":\"Janice Hahn\",\"role_title\":\"Supervisor, Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors\",\"affiliation_type\":\"government\"},{\"name\":\"Eric Previn\",\"role_title\":\"Caller / member of the public\",\"affiliation_type\":\"citizen\"},{\"name\":\"Kathy Curry\",\"role_title\":\"Survivor / claimant\",\"affiliation_type\":\"citizen\"}]

Authorities
[{\"type\":\"other\",\"name\":\"Settlement agreement (item 11 on board agenda)\",\"citation\":\"not specified\",\"referenced_by\":[\"Item 11\"]}]

Actions
[{\"kind\":\"other\",\"identifiers\":{\"agenda_item_id\":\"11\"},\"motion\":\"Approve settlement (item 11 on the posted agenda)\",\"mover\":\"\",\"second\":\"\",\"vote_record\":[{\"member\":\"Hilda Solis\",\"vote\":\"yes\"},{\"member\":\"Holly Mitchell\",\"vote\":\"yes\"},{\"member\":\"Janice Hahn\",\"vote\":\"yes\"},{\"member\":\"Kathryn Barger\",\"vote\":\"yes\"}],\"tally\":{\"yes\":4,\"no\":0,\"abstain\":0,\"absent\":1},\"legal_threshold\":{\"met\":true,\"notes\":\"board voted in open session\"},\"outcome\":\"approved\",\"notes\":\"Public commenters requested prosecution, independent investigation and limits on legal fees; transcript records no detailed allocation breakdown in open session\"}]

Topics and scoring
- {\"name\":\"civil_litigation\",\"justification\":\"Settlement of alleged juvenile‑abuse claims discussed and approved; public requested accountability\",\"scoring\":{\"topic_relevance\":1.00,\"depth_score\":0.55,\"opinionatedness\":0.10,\"controversy\":0.80,\"civic_salience\":0.90,\"impactfulness\":0.85,\"geo_relevance\":1.00}}

Searchable_tags:[\"juvenile abuse settlement\",\"Los Angeles County\",\"item 11\",\"survivors\",\"legal fees\"]

Ending
The board approved the settlement item on the record. Public speakers urged the supervisors to pair any financial resolution with criminal investigations, independent review and limits on legal fees; the transcript does not show board action on those specific proposals during open session. Follow‑up reporting, budget allocations or prosecutorial referrals would be matters for subsequent staff reports or closed‑session deliberations.","The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors approved an item described during public comment as a settlement resolving juvenile‑abuse claims. Survivors and advocates urged the board to use settlement funds for investigations and to limit legal fees.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Board approves emergency measures for post-fire cleanup after residents urge testing and aid

Board approves settlement on juvenile‑abuse claims; survivors and callers press for prosecutions and limits on legal fees